June 13, 2005

2nd District (OH) Primary Prattle (061305 #2)

Filed under: OH-02 US House — TBlumer @ 10:59 pm

Cleanup points before the pre-voting post:

DeWine Radio Attack Ad on Brinkman and Death Penalty

So now DeWine attacks Brinkman, using Joe Deters as cover. It instantly legitimizes Brinkman in the minds of many who may have still (erroneously, in my opinion) perceived him as second-tier. Even if it peels off a few pro-death penalty folks, it’s counterproductive in a major way.

Bob McEwen’s Unfocused Reagan-These Charges Are False-Munoz Endorsement Radio Ad

From optimism to attack to endorsement all in 60 seconds–The ad starts with quotes from the Gipper himself, and uses Reagan’s 11th Commandment (”Thou Shalt Not Speak Ill of Another Republican”) as an excuse to bash DeWine and Brinkman (more Brinkman legitimization), and wraps up with a hasty endorsement from Anthony Munoz on helium. It leaves your head spinning.

During the “charges” section, the ad says that the other two candidates’ charges are false but never says what the charges are. Isn’t the listener going to be wondering what in the world the ad is talking about, and why the charges can’t be mentioned, when a normal refutation would (duh) identify what is being refuted?

BizzyBlog also reminds readers of the Republican 12th Commandment created just for Bob: “The 11th Commandment is suspended when your opponent, who is really a former congressman, constantly calls himself ‘Congressman’ in direct violation of Ohio election law both in print and on TV and radio.”

That Enquirer Collection of Candidate Statements on June 5

I wish I had commented sooner on these. The Enquirer wanted to know what three issues each candidate would hope to concentrate on if they are elected.

Almost all the candidates didn’t stop at three. A couple of them went past six.

But Brinkman stopped at three short and sweet things he would work on (”Make the Bush tax cuts permanent; Strengthen the family by passing a national marriage amendment; Focus on Eastern Corridor/Transportation.”).

So I talked to someone about the candidates’ answers, and she said “Brinkman’s answers were ridiculously brief.” But wait, he was about the only one who followed instructions. So if that reaction was common, even though Brinkman did as he was told (and almost all the others didn’t), he probably got hurt, if only a teeny bit. Zheesh.

A Blast from the Past on McEwen’s Misuse of Staff for Campaign Purposes (surprise-not)

From the November 1993 Washington Monthly, where a former McEwen aide discusses some of his activities during the failed 1992 reelection attempt:

“After Congress lets out in mid-October, it’s amazing how many staffers show up in the district hammering in yard signs,” says J. Kevin Broughton, a former press aide to Rep. Bob McEwen of Ohio, a member who lost last fall. “It’s wrong, but incumbents have an incredible, unfair advantage.” Among Broughton’s most important assignments last summer, he recalls, was creating a newsletter lauding the boss, who faced a tough primary battle. “It was nothing but glorifying the incumbent, but we disguised it as informing constituents and sent out hundreds of thousands of copies as franked mail,” says Broughton.

The ethics manual notes that incumbents cannot use their frank for mass mailings within 60 days of a primary or general election.

Is there a word for “unimportant” stronger than “irrelevant”?

Barring a surprise in the next three hours, or something obvious that I am somehow missing, The Cincinnati Post is not endorsing a candidate in the Second District Primary on either side of the aisle.

2nd District (OH) Primary Prattle (061305 #1)

Filed under: OH-02 US House — TBlumer @ 5:59 pm

What a day:

A sort-of hit record, but who are all these clicksters?

Except for an Instalanche about 2 months ago (for non-bloggers, that’s a huge amount of hits courtesy of blog king Instapundit.com), and possibly one day of traffic from Michelle Malkin, this has been BizzyBlog’s busiest traffic day (thanks for the interest).

What is very odd is that as the election has drawn nearer the percentage of clickthroughs I can’t identify (called “no referrer” links by my counter) along with those coming in from e-mail addresses and search engines, has increased to the point where they are now about two-thirds of all uniques. While it’s neat to have secret admirers, BizzyBlog would be curious to know which people from which campaigns have been clicking in, and why. E-mail me to reveal yourself (hey, it’s the last day of the primary campaign).

A mystery that needs to be “Doug” into

Who is Doug, and why does Weapons of Mass Discussion (one of the best blog names ever) want his opinion of the “more” section of this BizzyBlog post? Memo to Doug–Everything before the “more” section of the post is much more interesting.

One More Screwy Disclosure Form and I Won’t be Responsible for What Happens

I’m not even in the mood to try to explain this, so I’ll just point you to it and y’all can figure it out for me:
- The FEC received the document on May 16.
- Bob McEwen signed it on what looks to be April 29 (McEwen appears to have graduated from the BizzyBlog School of [lousy] Penmanship).
- The election is (duh) on June 14, 29 days after the FEC received the document.
- House Ethics Rules that dictate requirements and deadlines for personal financial disclosure say (bold is mine):

CONGRESSIONAL CANDIDATES: A congressional candidate must file within 30 days of raising or spending $5,000 for a campaign for election to the U.S. House of Representatives, or on or before May 15 of the calendar year in which he or she becomes a candidate, whichever is later. However, there are certain exceptions to this general rule. A qualifying candidate must file no later than 30 days before an election in which the individual is participating. If he or she does not exceed the $5,000 threshold until sometime within that 30-day period, the candidate should file the Financial Disclosure Statement immediately after he or she raises or spends more than $5,000. If a campaign never exceeds the $5,000 threshold, the candidate need not file a Financial Disclosure Statement. In each subsequent year in which an individual continues to be a candidate on May 15, a new report must be filed by that date.

Delegation is a good thing, so I’m dumping this on delegating this to you, dear readers. What’s your conclusion? E-mail me.

None of this changes my belief that from an ethical standpoint the candidate owed the voters full financial disclouse weeks ago.

Shameless shilling for free food and drink the opportunity to live-blog an election night gathering

BizzyBlog will entertain invitations to live-blog at the campaign headquarters of any long-time resident GOP candidate (ahem) who will have me (am I presumptuous or what?). My only requirements are high-speed Internet access (preferably wireless), and the patience to put up with a boring, geeky, Mac-loving CPA. Plentiful food and beverages would not be rejected (out of politeness, of course). E-mail me if you’re up for the risk. And no laughing at my car.

2nd District (OH) Race: The McEwen Connections, Part 6–
The McEwens and Amway Quixtar (AQ)

Filed under: Consumer Outrage, Corporate Outrage, OH-02 US House — TBlumer @ 12:27 am

Part 1: Advantage Associates
Part 2: Jefferson Consulting and the 12-Year Gap
Part 3: The Non-Disclosure Gambit
Part 4: Those “Self-Employed” Contributors
Part 5: The Amway-Quixtar Business
Part 6: THIS POST
_____________

UPDATE: Note that BizzyBlog has found posts at AQ Blogharbor sites showing that Bob McEwen made speeches at AQ events as recently as late last year, and perhaps even more recently than that.
_____________

Have the McEwens Been Active in AQ?

BizzyBlog has obtained three audiocassettes (dates unknown, but based on their contents, and the fact that they are cassettes, I would estimate that they are from about 1998) from presentations made by Bob and Liz McEwen at Amway functions:
- Bob’s first tape is called “When Government Controls the Tools, It Controls the Man.”
- Bob’s second is entitled “Six Sign Posts to Freedom.”
- Liz’s tape is “How Husbands and Wives Are Different.”

Bob makes frequent reference to AQ (then Amway) and its success in the course of his speeches. Liz’s tape is important because her final statement on it (”Let’s All Go Diamond”) confirms, more than anything Bob specifically said, that the McEwens were still active AQ IBOs (then referred to as Amway, and then often called “distributors”) when they made their speeches. BizzyBlog has also learned that Liz McEwen was reported as an Amway distributor in a congressional financial disclosure form in 1991, the last full year Bob McEwen had to provide such disclosure as a congressman.

McEwen’s Speaking Fees: Who Pays Them?

So how much does Bob McEwen make for each speech? According to his Speakers Bureau page, the answer is $10,000.

Now, stop, right, there. Or more specifically, go right here, and compare McEwen’s speaking fee to that of a few people who are by any reasonable measurement higher-level luminaries than him. Some examples:
- Author/columnist David Limbaugh: $7,500
- Fox and Friends co-host Steve Doocy: $10,000
- Newsweek columnist and frequent TV guest Eleanor Clift: $8,000

(Note: The next paragraph is conjecture on my part that would been unnecessary had Bob McEwen not, as noted in Part 3, “cleverly” delayed his declaration of candidacy until May 16, meaning that his financial-disclosure forms don’t need to be completed or submitted until after the election Tuesday. If anyone has any quarrel with this now clearly identified conjecture, your complaint is not with me.)

I look at Bob’s fee and I ask “How many people are willing to pay a former congressman (not even a senator) who has been out of office and generally out of the limelight for all that time $10,000 for a keynote? I believe that AQ and its higher-up IBOs may be among the few willing to do so, and indeed may even be the only ones. And why would they be willing to pay what appears to be an outsized fee?

What Has Bob Done for AQ?

BizzyBlog has had an e-mail exchange and several discussions over the past 12 days with Eric Scheibeler, a former AQ (Amway at the time) IBO/Distributor whose performance enabled him to reach nearly the highest levels of the company. I have read his entire book, “Merchants of Deception,” and find his story not only highly credible but virtually impossible to make up out of whole cloth at the level of detail it is presented.

The e-mail I am showing below is his response to my specific request to characterize Bob McEwen’s involvement in AQ (then Amway).

(Note: The e-mail contains Mr. Scheibeler’s recounting of events and his opinions, and is slightly abridged. I exerted no influence over what Mr. Scheibeler sent me.)

Tom,

….. This is a “Reader’s Digest” condensed version to help bring you up to speed on this global “business opportunity” fraud and the participation of Bob McEwen. I am a former Federal auditor. Good friends recruited my wife and I into Amway and we quickly rose through the ranks to the top 1/25th of 1% in the nation and developed a global business. We spoke to thousands from stage and recruited all those we knew an loved. At that point, I discovered, as a former federal auditor, systematic consumer fraud. I naively thought it was limited to the kingpin level distributors and reported it to Amway President Dick DeVos. Amway responded by shutting off our sole income in an effort to starve us into silence. I was told in a face to face meeting what gun will be used to kill me if I caused trouble. My wife and young son were threatened on the telephone, resulting in a tap and trace (FBI) on our line. (stricken on May 18, 2007: See Update 3 below) When we were about to lose our home, we were offered a “sale” of our business for $75,000 while being pressured to sign a non disclosure. We left our family home to be able to speak freely and protect others.

I wrote an exceptionally well documented book titled Merchants of Deception that ….. is the result of near 5,000 hours of investigative research. Perhaps what stunned me the most was to learn that this fraud has been perpetrated with near franchise like precision for two decades, as supported by 20 banker boxes of documentation. Amway has collaborated and financially rewarded the most egregious offenders. A twisted, perverted version of Christianity is utilized as bait to lure good people to their economic demise. Research and documentation reveal that over 99% of those recruited lose money and have for over 20 years. This is perhaps the most well organized consumer fraud in history, currently culling literally $6 Billion annually.

…… Since launching the (Merchants of Deception web site, over 127,000 have downloaded the free e-book version of Merchants of Deception ….. I am receiving hundreds of contacts from victims or family of victims in China, Italy, France, Germany, UK, Netherlands, South Africa, Malaysia, Indonesia, India, Australia, New Zealand, Canada, Russia, the US and others. Distributors have lost $20,000 to in excess of $100,000 and four distributor suicides have been reported to date; two in the US and two in Australia. Hundreds of victim testimonials are pouring in from around the world.

The FBI has added an additional agent to the fraud investigation and set up a specific e-mail account for me to forward victim testimonials to. Additionally, I flew to Orlando and provided my book and supporting documentation of tax fraud in another investigation being conducted by the Criminal Investigation Division (CID) of the IRS. My motivations in this punishing task are neither anger nor revenge. My involvement is most unlikely as I am non confrontational by nature. This simply must be stopped. The heartbreaking testimonials of families torn apart by this come in every single day.

Please find enclosed one critical report. The author is a gentleman who is perhaps the world’s foremost expert on organized crime. He, in fact, wrote the RICO laws that broke the back of the Mafia in the early 1970’s. He was hired in one of countless lawsuits against Amway to review how they do business. This confidential report was sealed in a case and was never to see the light of day for reasons that are self evident when you read it. Please feel free to contact me if I can provide you with additional information. I will be glad to do an interview should you have an interest.

This would not have gone on for so long had the credibility of prominent politicians and religious leaders been utilized. Former US presidents Reagan, Bush and Ford were all brought in to speak for enormous fees. I was at multiple meetings in which Bob McEwen spoke. His hands on involvement in what appears to be the largest consumer fraud of our time may need to be scrutinized by those deciding to vote. This has a near 99% failure rate among those many people in Ohio who have been induced to invest in this business opportunity fraud. Some have lost tens of thousands while others have lost in excess of $100,000. Others leave requiring cult exit counseling. Why would Mr. McEwen be involved on any level with this? Has his credibility been unknowingly hijacked or is he reaping the benefits from the many Ohio constituents who lose month after month in this? How much has he taken in speaking fees to date? Is he an active recruiter for this organziation?

Thank you very much for your time. You cannot imagine how many people this story will help.

So what have learned from Mr. Scheibeler, if we are to believe him (and that’s frankly up to you, dear reader), and other sources?
1. There is an FBI investigation into AQ and/or certain of its high-level IBOs.
2. There has been a comprehensive study of AQ’s business model and methods. BizzyBlog has received reviewed the “RICO Report” referred to in bold above, and in the interest of clarity has decided to put it on the web site here (warning: PDF file) for anyone who wishes to read it (May 2007 — the report was removed in the interest of preserving space; please e-mail me if you wish to see it or have me repost it after I cut over to a new server in June 2007). I will simply note the overall conclusion of the author, who in addition to the credentials cited above was at the time of the report a law professor at Notre Dame Law School:

3. Bob McEwen was a frequent AQ speaker, and perhaps continued to be one until very recently.

Mr. Scheibeler, in a different e-mail, informed me that McEwen’s tapes were sold to IBOs along with other motivational materials on the “we expect you to buy these because you’re on the team” basis described earlier in Part 5.

(Note: the following sentence is also conjecture) BizzyBlog also believes the CDs and DVDs available for sale at Bob McEwen’s personal web site through “Freedom Question International” are tapes of presentations at Amway and AQ with all Amway/AQ-specfic references removed.

So, Where Does This Leave Us?

As with so many other aspects of Bob McEwen’s last 12 years, his involvement with AQ leaves a number of questions for which voters should have answers before they enter the voting booth on Tuesday, and which probably are not forthcoming. Among them are:

  • Why hasn’t he said a word about his apparently still-current or near-current involvement with AQ (based on the endorsements cited in Part 4 at numerous Quixtar Blogharbor sites, and reference to speeches made in late 2004)? All along voters have been led to believe he is (implication: solely) a lobbyist and consultant.
  • How much and what percentage of his income from speaking engagements, and from sales of books and tapes, is from AQ?
  • How much of his income from sales of books and tapes, is from his web site with non-AQ customers, vs. sales strictly within AQ (a small hint that his personal site’s sales are very small is that it is not equipped for e-commerce, a situation that would normally only be appropriate in a low-volume situation)?
  • Has McEwen ever become aware of any information that would lead him to suspect that AQ is engaging or has engaged in illegal activity? Has he followed up on any suspicions?
  • (If Eric Scheibeler is correct) Is he aware that AQ is under investigation? Has he done anything to distance himself from AQ as a result?
  • Is anyone from AQ expecting any special favors from McEwen when he enters office (some observers believe, based on legislative activity taking place in some states and the increased visible political involvement noted earlier, that there is reason to be concerned that AQ might attempting to have portions of consumer law quietly revised to make their business model pass legal muster before the investigations referred to earlier make too much headway)?
  • What do (or perhaps would) McEwen’s Washington-insider, values-guru, and celebrity endorsers (including the recently ubiquitous-on-the-airwaves Anthony Munoz) make of all this? Do they have any idea that he is involved with AQ? Will anyone ask them how they feel about his involvement?

Once again, an aspect of Bob McEwen’s life after Congress is fraught with uncertainty at best, and perhaps other problems beyond that. Somehow, he expects voters to put all of these uncertainties aside and bet the district on his character, even though they haven’t seen it up close and personal in 12 years, even though what has been learned provides scant reason for comfort, even though he has avoided the kind of financial disclosure voters have a right to expect before an election, and even though the other candidates in this race who have lived here and worked here have no remotely similar baggage.

For the life of me, I don’t understand why any voter would take such a gamble.

____________

Update 1: Zheesh, I forgot to mention the hard-hitting story that Dateline NBC carried in May of last year about AQ.

Excerpt A (about halfway through–the named people are all ex-AQ IBOs, except Hansen, who is the interviewer):

Short: “There is another business.”

And it’s a business that is completely separate from Quixtar, a hidden business that most recruits don’t realize exists. Short says many of those high-level distributors singing the praises of Quixtar on stage are actually making most of their money by selling motivational books, tapes and seminars — not Quixtar’s cosmetics, soaps and electronics.

Hansen: “This was the dirty little secret.”

Short: “That’s exactly what it was, absolutely.”

Hansen: “That’s not what you hear at the conventions.”

Short: “No, and that’s not what you’re told in somebody’s living room when you see it either.”

In fact, about 20 high level distributors are part of an exclusive club, one that those hundreds of thousands of other distributors don’t get to join. For years only a privileged few, including Bill Britt, have run hugely profitable businesses, selling all those books, tapes and seminars — things the rank and file distributors can’t sell themselves, but are told over and over again they need to buy in order to succeed.

Hansen: “Why are the recruits told to listen to the tapes and read the books over and over and over again?”

Short: “Because it creates a dependency and it creates a habit that keeps you bound to that business.”

Excerpt B (Fredericks in an AQ IBO and recruiter, bold is mine):

Hansen: So how much does an average Quixtar distributor really make? Well, only about $1,400 per year. What’s the source for that figure? It’s Quixtar itself. You can find it in the fine print of the company’s own registration materials. That’s $248,600 less than what our recruiter, Greg Fredericks, said we could make.

We caught up with him at one of his recruitment meetings.

Hansen: “We’re doing a story on Quixtar and Quixtar distributors.”

Fredericks: “Okay.”

Hansen: “And these folks here work with me.”

Fredericks: “Oh, great.”

Hansen: “ And we wanted to ask you a couple of questions.”

Fredericks: “Sure.”

First we reminded him about the money he said we could make.

Hansen: “Are you really making…”

Fredericks: “I’m not disclosing that.”

Hansen: “A quarter million dollars by working merely 15, 16 hours a week?

Fredericks: “[affirms] But I’m not going to disclose to you my information as far as my personal income.”

But what he did let slip when he didn’t know the camera was rolling was that one of the elite distributors we saw on stage is making most of his money from the motivation business.

Fredericks: “Probably three quarters of it.”

Sandler: “And that’s from seminars — holding seminars?”

Fredericks: “Seminars, rallies, functions, motivational tools, tapes, books, speaking engagements, appearances.”

But he didn’t seem to remember saying that.

Fredericks: “I don’t know where that number came from. You’re mentioning a number, three quarters of what his income is…”

Hansen: “That’s what you said, not what I said.”

Fredericks: “Did I say that?”

UPDATE 2: In the interest of equal time, I just came across Quixtar’s reaction to Eric Scheibeler’s book claims (but note the lack of response to substantive claims about IBO success or lack thereof–also to be clear, McEwen’s name does not appear in his book; Scheibeler says that is because so many other people of higher stature and celebrity have lent unwarranted credibility to AQ that McEwen was on a relative basis a second-tier celebrity):

(click “more” to read the response)
(more…)