<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2nd District: A Question for Procter &#038; Gamble Employees, Their Families, and P&#038;G Shareholders</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bizzyblog.com/2005/06/14/2nd-district-a-question-for-procter-gamble-employees-and-their-families/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bizzyblog.com/2005/06/14/2nd-district-a-question-for-procter-gamble-employees-and-their-families/</link>
	<description>The Business End of the Blogosphere</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 09:45:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ohio 2nd</title>
		<link>http://www.bizzyblog.com/2005/06/14/2nd-district-a-question-for-procter-gamble-employees-and-their-families/#comment-488</link>
		<dc:creator>Ohio 2nd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2005 18:52:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bizzyblog.com/?p=222#comment-488</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Trademark&#174; of the Beast&lt;/strong&gt;

BizzyBlog posts another interesting angle on Bouncing Bob McEwen, related to Procter &#38; Gamble. Now this is interesting to me because McEwen mentioned P&#38;G in the June 7th forum. Afterwards I made it a point to ask him to clarify what he had said...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Trademark&#174; of the Beast</strong></p>
<p>BizzyBlog posts another interesting angle on Bouncing Bob McEwen, related to Procter &amp; Gamble. Now this is interesting to me because McEwen mentioned P&amp;G in the June 7th forum. Afterwards I made it a point to ask him to clarify what he had said&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
