<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nightly News Bias Continues, and Why It Won&#8217;t Stop Anytime Soon</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bizzyblog.com/2005/07/12/nightly-news-bias-continues-and-why-it-wont-stop-anytime-soon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bizzyblog.com/2005/07/12/nightly-news-bias-continues-and-why-it-wont-stop-anytime-soon/</link>
	<description>The Business End of the Blogosphere</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 10:15:48 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: TBlumer</title>
		<link>http://www.bizzyblog.com/2005/07/12/nightly-news-bias-continues-and-why-it-wont-stop-anytime-soon/#comment-1027</link>
		<dc:creator>TBlumer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2005 12:23:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bizzyblog.com/?p=278#comment-1027</guid>
		<description>Interesting point. I'll be on the lookout for data about the MF breakdown of nightly news watchers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting point. I&#8217;ll be on the lookout for data about the MF breakdown of nightly news watchers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Hardin</title>
		<link>http://www.bizzyblog.com/2005/07/12/nightly-news-bias-continues-and-why-it-wont-stop-anytime-soon/#comment-1020</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Hardin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2005 11:01:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bizzyblog.com/?p=278#comment-1020</guid>
		<description>The target demographic is soap-opera women (comprising 40% of women, a minority but a big one).  Stories must be simple, and they must be ones that the soap opera news audience can relate to.

People say they want hard news, but they won't tune in to watch hard news (think city council meetings), and so these people won't pay the bills.  You need people who come every day, news or no news.  The surge for one-off events won't work day-to-day.

Remember the product of news organizations is not news; it is you.  They sell you to advertisers.

Whether there is a successful business model for news that does not cater to this soap audience is an open question.  I doubt there is.

In any case, the strategic route to having this air-head minority audience choose the topics for national debate is to ridicule the soap audience, not the networks.  The networks know they're producing crap, and also that their target demographic likes crap.

The ``serious news'' posture is marketing : you soap-opera women are serious people because we say so.  They like that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The target demographic is soap-opera women (comprising 40% of women, a minority but a big one).  Stories must be simple, and they must be ones that the soap opera news audience can relate to.</p>
<p>People say they want hard news, but they won&#8217;t tune in to watch hard news (think city council meetings), and so these people won&#8217;t pay the bills.  You need people who come every day, news or no news.  The surge for one-off events won&#8217;t work day-to-day.</p>
<p>Remember the product of news organizations is not news; it is you.  They sell you to advertisers.</p>
<p>Whether there is a successful business model for news that does not cater to this soap audience is an open question.  I doubt there is.</p>
<p>In any case, the strategic route to having this air-head minority audience choose the topics for national debate is to ridicule the soap audience, not the networks.  The networks know they&#8217;re producing crap, and also that their target demographic likes crap.</p>
<p>The &#8220;serious news&#8221; posture is marketing : you soap-opera women are serious people because we say so.  They like that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
