Public Retirement Systems: A ‘Small’ Peek at a Huge Problem
Just one city of 331,000 (and shrinking). Just one workforce. A $20 million shortfall (not $9 million-read the whole excerpt), per year:
Cincinnati taxpayers may have to chip in at least $9 million more a year to the city’s pension fund to keep it funded at current levels, according to actuarial reports submitted to City Council last week.
The report likely will force City Council to make a decision that it put off in March, when the $2.28 billion Cincinnati Retirement System proposed cutting health care benefits to keep the system solvent.
“It’s a big budget issue,” said William E. Moller, the city’s finance director and secretary to the pension fund’s board of trustees. “The system is not in what you would call bad shape. But you raise the funding now because you don’t want to get into a situation you can’t recover from later on.”
Under city ordinances, employees pay 7.32 percent of their paychecks toward retirement, with the city picking up whatever’s needed to keep the system fully funded.
Some years, big investment gains mean the city doesn’t have to pay anything. But next year, the city will have to put in 23 percent of payroll, the actuarial reports say.
The problem: City Council budgeted only 11 percent.
That leaves a $20 million hole to fill. Of that, $11 million comes from self-sufficient city departments – like Water Works and Sewers – that rely on ratepayers for income (that could mostly be privatized at huge savings to taxpayers/ratepayers–Ed.). The remaining $9 million comes from taxpayer-supported departments, leaving less money in the city’s discretionary budget.
This is one small example of a very big problem (about 1/3 of the way through the linked page) in most of the nation’s state and local public pension systems:
More important, there’s another, more ominous trend that threatens to unravel state and local fiscal stability. Rising pension and healthcare costs for retirees and active workers could soon crowd out current outlays for municipal services and require still-higher property and sales taxes. Data on public pension funding needs are notoriously difficult to come by. For example, Federal Reserve data show all state and local government retirement funds had assets of $2038 billion at the end of 2003, and a Wilshire study of 123 state retirement systems found that they were 82% funded at that time …. Extrapolating that to the total of all state and local funds implies a $447 billion funding gap.
But the Wilshire study does not examine whether the actuarial and return assumptions in these calculations are realistic, and the history from private plans hints that they may understate liabilities.
For some perspective: The $447 billion, if correct (and as noted, it could very well be understated), is about 25% of the Social Security NOdometer reading (about $1.73 trillion at the moment) on the left frame of this page–for roughly 11% of the total workforce. *
The current state and local public retirement systems are even less sustainable than the current Social Security system.
This situation represents just one reason why citizen initiatives like the Ohio Tax Expenditure Limitation (TEL), which is on track to appear on the ballot in November 2006, are so important:
Citizens for Tax Reform’s Tax Expenditure Limitation (TEL) Amendment limits state and local government annual spending growth to 3.5 per cent or the sum of the rate of inflation plus population growth. Any year-end unspent revenue over 10 per cent of the budget is to be refunded to taxpayers. Local governments receive a guaranteed five per cent of the previous fiscal year’s aggregate state expenditures, and unfunded mandates are forbidden.
Left on autopilot, public pension costs will bust these perfectly reasonable limits annually. Left to their own devices, lawmakers have shown that they will do anything they can to increase taxes rather than face up to the problem. TEL-like restrictions will force the hard and necessary public pension choices before they eat state and local budgets and economies alive. Experience has shown that nothing else will work.
* – There were 5 million state employees and 14 million local employees in July 2005, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics (go to the bottom). A 1998 BLS report (PDF, not linked) that is apparently the latest available indicated that 14 million state and local employees had traditional pension coverage; I would estimate that number to be 16 million now based on population and government growth. The 11% referred to above is that 16 million divided by total national employment of 142 million as of July 2005.










