Another Country We Should NOT Imitate (the Cost of “Free” Canadian Health Care)
Here is another country with an economic policy we should not imitate, unless economic mediocrity is our goal (see previous item on the European Union).
From John Fund in The Wall Street Journal today, on Canada’s health-care system (link requires subscription; bold is mine), the one “single-payer” (meaning “nationalized”) health care advocates insist is superior:
The Fraser Institute has found it takes an average of 17.9 weeks between the time a patient makes an appointment to see a general practitioner and when he can then see a specialist. He will then be treated by a system that ranks 13th out of 22 advanced countries in access to MRI technology; 17th out of 21 in access to CT scanners and seventh out of 22 in access to radiation machines. The safety valve in the system is that nearby U.S. hospitals can provide treatment for emergency cases and patients willing to pay.
But Canada’s public care doesn’t save money. As the satirist P.J. O’Rourke once noted, “If you think health care is expensive now, wait until you see what it costs when it’s free.” When adjusted for the age of its population, Canada vies with Iceland and Switzerland as the highest spender on health care among the 28 most developed nations with universal systems. Dr. David Gratzer, a Toronto physician affiliated with the Manhattan Institute, calculates that a Canadian earning $35,000 a year pays a stunning $7,350 in health-care taxes.










I called my doctor’s office at 10am a couple of weeks ago and I was in to see her by 2pm that same day.
Yep, we need better health care in this country. Let’s march on Washington.
Comment by Dan Sherman — August 12, 2005 @ 12:20 pm