
(image courtesy blogbis.blogspot.com)
Unfortunately I had to go to Yahoo! News to verify the company’s defense of the actions described in this previous post (essentially giving the Chinese government the info they needed to jail a dissenting journalist for 10 years), but you won’t have to, and I won’t supply the link (HT Hoy Story via Ace, who likens the company’s excuses to the Nuremberg Defense; bolds are mine):
Yahoo’s Yang say hands tied in China Internet censorship case
HANGZHOU, China (AFP) – Yahoo Inc. (Nasdaq:YHOO – news) chief Jerry Yang said his company was complying with local laws when information on an Internet user was passed to Chinese police in a move leading to the jailing of a mainland journalist.
Yang, speaking at the Alibaba China Internet Summit here, also said he wasn’t happy with the 10-year sentence to journalist Shi Tao, jailed for passing on a government censorship order through his Yahoo e-mail account.
“We did not know what they wanted information for, we are not told what they look for, if they give us the proper documentation in a court order we give them things that satisfy local laws,” Yang told journalists
“I don’t like the outcome of what happened with this thing, we get a lot of these orders, but we have to comply with the law and that’s what we need to do.”
Shi, 37, was convicted in April for “revealing state secrets,” by using his email account to post on the Internet a government order barring Chinese media from marking the 15th anniversary of the brutal June 1989 crackdown on democracy activists in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square.
Last week, Yahoo’s actions were revealed in the court’s verdict, copies of which were posted on overseas Chinese websites.
According to the verdict, the California-based company’s Hong Kong subsidiary, Yahoo Hong Kong, gave the details to China’s state security.
Shi, who worked for the Hunan-based Contemporary Business News, has insisted he is innocent, arguing that the government order was not a state secret. (Duh–Ed.)
Yahoo co-founder Yang stressed his company must comply with local regulations, but said he was also concerned with the safety of Internet users in China.
“We are all here in China that represents quite a lot of opportunities, not only on the business side, but also on the social side,” Yang said.
….. Also speaking at the summit was former US president Bill Clinton who sidestepped talk of China’s jailing of Internet political dissidents, but indicated web censorship could have a commercial backlash in the future.
“In China, I think that so far the political system and restraint on political speech in the Internet has not seemed to have any adverse commercial consequences,” Clinton said.
“It will be interesting to see whether that is true of the future.”
It won’t be true if Yahoo! customers and users around the world do everything in their power to become ex-customers and non-users, and thus cause the “adverse commerical consequences necessary to get the attention of cynically opportunistic snitches like Yahoo!.
___________________
UPDATE, September 14: Yahoo! is getting press today for starting up a blog that is seen as a beginning of an effort to create an alternative media outlet to compete with the Mainstream Media. It’s hard for me to be impressed, when the gentleman involved has a history with CNN, which twisted its news from Iraq for years to curry favor with Saddam Hussein, and when Yahoo! itself would appear to be willing to the same in similar circumstances (”complying with local laws and customs,” y’know).