September 25, 2005

The Kelo Backlash Continues: New London’s Voters May Strike Back Tuesday

Filed under: Economy, MSM Biz/Other Ignorance, Taxes & Government — TBlumer @ 4:13 pm

The amazingly underreported local Kelo news continues.

New London, CT voters may strike back hard this Tuesday in a city budget referendum. The New London Day’s Editorial Page Editor is obviously worried, and decidedly unsympathetic (link requires registration and will require payment if accessed after 7 days):

New London Faces Rising Tide Of Anger
By MORGAN MCGINLEY

New London never has lacked for taxpayers upset with the city. But this year the mood is much more extreme. Anger rules the day in New London and that environment is not good, for it threatens to tip the fragile balance that keeps the city hopeful in difficult times. The vehement local reaction to the Supreme Court decision that upheld the city’s taking of Fort Trumbull homes is glaring enough, but it has been exacerbated by two events.

The first is the ham-handed decision by the New London Development Corp. to send out letters telling property owners that they’d soon face eviction. The message that went out was an insult to many people in town. Did the NLDC (director) not understand the letters would produce a gut reaction similar to that felt across the country to the Supreme Court decision, no matter how correct he feels it was? Does the NLDC board ever put a human face on what it is doing and understand that people have feelings and don’t enjoy being lectured to or threatened?

While the City Council tries to figure out how to get the Fort Trumbull development on track, it has exhausted its patience for the NLDC leadership. The timing couldn’t be worse, of course, but few people in the city, and certainly not the council, can figure out how to turn negative anger into positive passion and forge a solution. The Fort Trumbull project is a mess that requires cooperation among the tenants there, the council and the NLDC, but how that happens amidst the ire felt by all three parties is not obvious.

Gov. M. Jodi Rell wisely provided a mediator to set up talks between Corcoran Jennison, the hotel developer, and the NLDC. But since then, the governor has made some curious remarks, the most damaging of which was her condemnation of the Supreme Court for its decision in the Kelo v. New London case. The reaction took everyone by surprise, since it is the state Department of Economic and Community Development that continues to push the project. The deal may have started in the Rowland administration, but it is the governor’s problem now.

The second tribulation visited on New London comes from the threat that residents will take their anger from the Fort Trumbull dispute and apply it to the city budget referendum scheduled Tuesday. When people are angry, it’s convenient to direct their feelings at anything in front of them. The foul mood in New London has now struck the budget vote.

To understand the depth of feelings, drive along some of the most expensive neighborhoods on Pequot, Montauk and Ocean avenues. Signs to vote “no” on the budget are numerous, and they come from people who largely can afford the taxes.

The reaction is worse than unfortunate. It amounts to a pending disaster, for New London has so stripped down its basic services, even police and fire, that necessary functions often don’t get done. Should the referendum be successful, for example, vacancies in the Police Department may not be filled. Department consolidations, prospective layoffs, large numbers of teachers’ jobs going unfilled — all demonstrate a small city with huge revenue problems and voters who have lost their capacity for reason.

….. These are chaotic times in my native city. Amidst all the anger, will there be a majority of people who seek the common good and possess a penchant for the truth? Or will the warring parties seek their own ends, and the hell with the character of the city?

Despite Mr. McGinley’s protests, the real “problem,” is that the voters have lost their patience for tyrants. There’s nothing like closed pocketbooks to wake up political leaders.
_____________________

PREVIOUS POSTS:
- What’s Happening to the Real People in the Kelo Case
- Kelo Eviction Notices Issued in Apparent Defiance of CT Governor
- Kelo Update: A Major Blowback against the Eminent Domain Tyrants?

5 Comments

  1. We are following the most recent developments in New London, and in fact, I have written another blog on the Kelo decision and its aftermath today, titled “Eminent Domain Evictions.”

    Comment by William J. Ward, Esq. — September 25, 2005 @ 6:11 pm

  2. The evictions were withdrawn after pressure from the governor (”rescission”), according to this Volokh link:
    http://volokh.com/posts/1127162639.shtml

    Comment by TBlumer — September 25, 2005 @ 7:11 pm

  3. Tyrants brought up short. Heartwarming, thanks!

    Comment by dave — September 25, 2005 @ 7:53 pm

  4. I just love the unbiased even tone of the reporting. No liberal bias there!
    BTW, you can get to the paper using BugMeNot dot com. Email address theday@mailinator.com
    user name abcdefg

    Comment by pedro — September 26, 2005 @ 9:51 am

  5. Band new documentary on eminent domain and corporate welfare
    called begging for billionaires is about nationwide epidemic happening to cities across america. This documentary follow the kelo case went in front of Us Supreme court last year.Documentary follows two family who family buiness being taken with eminent domain.And others who trying to fight for right of property
    so if you could please help spread the word on documentry and wedsite at http://www.beggingforbillionaires.com It would be geatly appriciated.

    Comment by philip klein — July 29, 2006 @ 2:47 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.