<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Coleman Internet Resolution: Get an Up-or-Down Vote</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bizzyblog.com/2005/10/21/the-coleman-internet-resolution-get-an-up-or-down-vote/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bizzyblog.com/2005/10/21/the-coleman-internet-resolution-get-an-up-or-down-vote/</link>
	<description>The Business End of the Blogosphere</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 23:16:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: TBlumer</title>
		<link>http://www.bizzyblog.com/2005/10/21/the-coleman-internet-resolution-get-an-up-or-down-vote/#comment-2133</link>
		<dc:creator>TBlumer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Oct 2005 21:48:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bizzyblog.com/?p=692#comment-2133</guid>
		<description>Amen to that. Cancel his trip.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amen to that. Cancel his trip.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.bizzyblog.com/2005/10/21/the-coleman-internet-resolution-get-an-up-or-down-vote/#comment-2132</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Oct 2005 21:40:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bizzyblog.com/?p=692#comment-2132</guid>
		<description>Re #4:  I've just been told elsewhere, by a European, that American free speech/press concerns are "BS".  Let's spend the money on hurricane relief.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re #4:  I&#8217;ve just been told elsewhere, by a European, that American free speech/press concerns are &#8220;BS&#8221;.  Let&#8217;s spend the money on hurricane relief.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TBlumer</title>
		<link>http://www.bizzyblog.com/2005/10/21/the-coleman-internet-resolution-get-an-up-or-down-vote/#comment-2128</link>
		<dc:creator>TBlumer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2005 21:09:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bizzyblog.com/?p=692#comment-2128</guid>
		<description>#3, good thoughts. Have the up-or-down and Gross can stay home.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#3, good thoughts. Have the up-or-down and Gross can stay home.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.bizzyblog.com/2005/10/21/the-coleman-internet-resolution-get-an-up-or-down-vote/#comment-2127</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2005 19:03:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bizzyblog.com/?p=692#comment-2127</guid>
		<description>I think that there is a bi-partisan sense that Americans will not (re-)elect a Maoist.  So thinking strategically, the question becomes how clear we want to make it that the first amendment is just not negotiable at &lt;a href="http://www.rsf.org/article.php3?id_article=13314&#38;var_recherche=WSIS" rel="nofollow"&gt;WSIS&lt;/a&gt;. If we make it too obvious that Ambassador Gross is just there to smile, nod appreciatively and look concerned, then we might as well tell him to stay home and instead spend money on hurricane relief rather than wasting it on a diplomat's cocktail party in Tunisia.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that there is a bi-partisan sense that Americans will not (re-)elect a Maoist.  So thinking strategically, the question becomes how clear we want to make it that the first amendment is just not negotiable at <a href="http://www.rsf.org/article.php3?id_article=13314&amp;var_recherche=WSIS" rel="nofollow">WSIS</a>. If we make it too obvious that Ambassador Gross is just there to smile, nod appreciatively and look concerned, then we might as well tell him to stay home and instead spend money on hurricane relief rather than wasting it on a diplomat&#8217;s cocktail party in Tunisia.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TBlumer</title>
		<link>http://www.bizzyblog.com/2005/10/21/the-coleman-internet-resolution-get-an-up-or-down-vote/#comment-2126</link>
		<dc:creator>TBlumer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2005 17:15:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bizzyblog.com/?p=692#comment-2126</guid>
		<description>#1, I don't know. Which Senator?

The point of the up-down vote would be to identify senators, if any, who would give away control of Internet governance, and to force wafflers to think it through and go on the record, a la Kyoto.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#1, I don&#8217;t know. Which Senator?</p>
<p>The point of the up-down vote would be to identify senators, if any, who would give away control of Internet governance, and to force wafflers to think it through and go on the record, a la Kyoto.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.bizzyblog.com/2005/10/21/the-coleman-internet-resolution-get-an-up-or-down-vote/#comment-2124</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2005 16:17:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bizzyblog.com/?p=692#comment-2124</guid>
		<description>&lt;p align="left"&gt;Which senator wants to give the .tw ccTLD away?

&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align="left"&gt;News from .gov.tw: &lt;a href="http://english.www.gov.tw/UN/index.jsp?categid=126&#38;recordid=52554" rel="nofollow"&gt;Taiwan Deserves a Place in the United Nations&lt;/a&gt;
It is almost unimaginable that there is one country, with a population greater than 140 of these UN member states, which is still barred from joining the United Nations. A democratic country with 23 million people, Taiwan is the worldâ€™s 17th largest economy and 15th largest trading nation.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align="left"&gt;...
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align="left"&gt;It is most regrettable that Taiwanâ€™s international status does not yet reasonably reflect its admirable political and economic achievements. At present, not only the United Nations but also its affiliated organizations adopt a discriminatory policy of segregation by shutting out Taiwan.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p align="left">Which senator wants to give the .tw ccTLD away?</p>
<p align="left">News from .gov.tw: <a href="http://english.www.gov.tw/UN/index.jsp?categid=126&amp;recordid=52554" rel="nofollow">Taiwan Deserves a Place in the United Nations</a><br />
It is almost unimaginable that there is one country, with a population greater than 140 of these UN member states, which is still barred from joining the United Nations. A democratic country with 23 million people, Taiwan is the worldâ€™s 17th largest economy and 15th largest trading nation.
</p>
<p align="left">&#8230;
</p>
<p align="left">It is most regrettable that Taiwanâ€™s international status does not yet reasonably reflect its admirable political and economic achievements. At present, not only the United Nations but also its affiliated organizations adopt a discriminatory policy of segregation by shutting out Taiwan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
