Another installment in a nearly-regular series of mysteries and pseudo-mysteries (usually 3-4) this inquiring mind would like to have answers for (some links included may require free registration):
QUESTION 1: Do you know that Western Europe and Scandanavia have “No-Go Areas”?
Talk about well-kept secrets:
For some years now West European city folk and police officers have been familiar with the reality that certain areas of major European cities are no-go areas, especially at night and certainly if you are white or wearing a uniform.
Detailed examples come from Sweden, France, Belgium, and Denmark. Read the whole thing.
The US has its fair share of dangerous neighborhoods, but relatively few where a person would not feel comfortable during broad daylight. Not so in the countries just mentioned (”especially at night” means it must be dangerous during the day too).
Over the past 20-plus years, Western Europe has allowed itself to develop into a tinderbox waiting to happen. Now it appears to be happening. There’s a lesson in this for US leaders and voters, if we’re willing to heed it.
QUESTION 2: What would YOU do if you were stuck in a permanent internship?
You might do what interns in France are doing (link requires subscription):
Stagiaires — interns — …. took to the streets. Wearing white masks and bearing banners (”no contract, no salary, no rights”), they marched on Tuesday for steady wages and benefits in their internships, claiming companies were getting around labor laws by taking so many of them on. In other words, they want a proper job, as opposed to, well, a stage, which they choose to take, presumably voluntarily. A nationwide strike of interns is scheduled for November 14.
In the spirit of the day, this social movement came to life on the Internet. Exasperated by serial unpaid internships that produced no permanent employment, “Katy” created a blog in September. “At 32, I am stuck in adolescence,” wrote the holder of two university degrees. “I don’t even have the right to unemployment insurance.” Imagine. It turns out that thousands share her fate. A movement — and of course a Web site — soon followed: Génération précaire (the precarious generation).
So the revolt of the well-educated, middle-class youth is on. By definition, internships give young people a taste of the working world. In France, an “intern strike” thus makes perfect sense because the country’s workers have made an art out of striking.
Such exploitation in the land of the 35-hour work week. Well, somebody has to do the work.
QUESTION 3: Why don’t more big-money donors put conditions like these on their gifts?
This is a very impressive gift (HT American Thinker):
The founder of eBay and his wife have donated $100 million to Tufts University, the school’s largest gift ever, but also one with a unique twist: All the money will be invested in microfinance, which involves tiny loans as low as $40, designed to help poor people in the developing world start small businesses, such as selling hand-woven cloth or goat’s milk.
Pierre and Pam Omidyar intend the gift to generate healthy returns for their alma mater and in so doing to demonstrate to other investors that microfinance deserves a hefty infusion of private capital, not just charitable and government dollars. Tufts and the Omidyars believe that the gift is the largest private allocation of capital to microfinance by any individual or family.
Unfortunately, I know part of the answer to the question: The beneficiaries won’t accept the money if it has certain conditions, regardless of the good the money might do. Two examples–
- In the mid-1990s, Yale turned down a $20 million gift from 1979 alum Lee Bass, which was intended to fund an intensive course in Western civilization. The link has lots of excuses, but another donor stated the blunt truth, that it was about hostility to the topic:
The delay grew from political issues, due to a liberal activist faculty, he said. Escridge called Administration statements that content was not a factor in the delays “lame excuses.” “It’s patently, obviously a political response, and it’s a negative one,” he said.
- A planned $200 million donation to Detroit’s public schools was withdrawn in October 2003, because it generated intense opposition from the entrenched:
Detroit businessman and philanthropist Robert Thompson has withdrawn an offer to fund new charter schools in Detroit after the proposal drew angry criticism from the city’s teachers union, which argued that the schools would drain millions of dollars from public schools, the Associated Press reports.
Thompson, the former owner of road building company Thompson-McCully Co., had planned to give $200 million through his foundation to open fifteen new charter high schools in the city. The move drew the ire of the Detroit Federation of Teachers, however, which held a large rally two weeks ago to protest the creation of additional charter schools in the state.
Such agenda-driven intransigence by beneficiaries will hurt them in the long run if more donors think through what they want done with their money, attach tough conditions to its use, and stick to their guns when challenged.