December 20, 2005

Passage of the Day: John Stossel on DDT Lunacy

Filed under: Economy, Environment, Quotes, Etc. of the Day, Taxes & Government — TBlumer @ 3:55 pm

It’s really offensive how much loss of life is tolerated in the name of reactionary environmentalism (bolds are mine):

Should the law promote human life, or should it sacrifice human beings and their quality of life on the altar of Gaia? Two to three million people die of malaria every year, Uganda’s health minister has said, because the U.S. government is afraid of a chemical called DDT. The United States does spend your tax dollars trying to fight malaria in Africa, but it won’t fund DDT. The money goes for things like mosquito netting over beds (even though not everyone in Africa even has a bed). The office that dispenses those funds, the Agency for International Development, acknowledges DDT is safe, but it will not spent a penny on it.

Why? Fifty years ago, Americans sprayed tons of DDT everywhere. Farmers used it to repel bugs, and health officials to fight mosquitoes that carry malaria. Nobody worried much about chemicals then. People really did just sit there and eat in clouds of DDT. When the trucks came to spray, people often acted as if the ice cream truck had come. They were so happy to have mosquitoes repelled. Huge amounts of DDT were sprayed on food and people, who just breathed it in.

Did they all get cancer and die? Nope.

Amazingly, there’s no evidence that all this spraying hurt people. It killed mosquitoes. (DDT also kills bedbugs, which are now making a comeback.) It did cause some harm, however. It threatened bird populations by thinning eggshells. In 1962, the book “Silent Spring” by Rachel Carson made the damage famous and helped create our fear of chemicals. The book raised some serious questions about the use of DDT, but the legitimate nature of those questions was lost in the media feeding frenzy that followed. DDT was a “Killer Chemical,” and the press was off on another fear campaign. DDT was banned.

But fear campaigns kill people, too. DDT is a great pesticide. The amount was the reason for the DDT problems. We sprayed far more than is needed to prevent the spread of malaria. It’s sprayed on walls, and one spraying will keep mosquitoes at bay for half a year. It’s a very efficient malaria fighter. But today, DDT is rarely used. America’s demonization of it caused others to shun it. And while the U.S. government spends tax money fighting malaria in Africa, it refuses to put that money into DDT. It might save lives, but it might offend environmentalist zealots and create political fallout.

DDT was banned in America after we started celebrating Earth Day. Environmentalists made a lot of claims then — I have an amusing clip of an environmentalist exclaiming, “You are breathing probably the last of the oxygen!” Soon after that the environmentalists mounted their campaign against DDT. The result? A huge resurgence of malaria, more than 50 million dead, mostly children.

….. (Scientist Amir) Attaran is leading a campaign of hundreds of scientists urging the use of DDT to combat malaria. It’s needed especially in Africa, he says, because malaria kills thousands there every day. “If I were to characterize what USAID does on malaria,” he said, “I’d call it medical malpractice, I would call it murderous.”

2 Comments

  1. This is one of those matters where balance and rationality is needed. Bringing back DDT is not the answer. Among other things is sanitation and control of mosquito breeding places. Africa has so many mismanagement problems that to say that the USA’s to blame for the responsibility of not financing DDT is somewhat disingenuous on the articles part.

    Environmentalism is not our enemy, rabid political polarity might be said to be, instead.

    Comment by ilona — December 21, 2005 @ 11:18 am

  2. What about “there’s no evidence that all this spraying hurt people” don’t you understand?

    When there is a solution at hand, all one can conclude is that the enviros think it’s more important that something they were wrong about stay banned than it is to save lives.

    Comment by TBlumer — December 21, 2005 @ 11:58 am

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.