Yesterday, LifeLike Pundits claimed that the story underlying this previous post is a “hoax,” and excerpts a Tulsa World article that is not available to non-print subscribers without a paid subscription:
SAND SPRINGS — A church that lies in the path of Sand Springs’ proposed Keystone Corridor redevelopment project is being cited nationally as an example of government flexing its power of eminent domain to take property for private commercial use.
But there’s a problem with the National Review Online’s assertions, city officials said: The city hasn’t filed any condemnation action against Centennial Baptist Church, nor does it intend to.
“There’s no eminent domain action going on against any properties there,” City Manager Loy Calhoun said. “No actions, no intents — nothing like that’s been done in the area.”
But this e-mail I received this morning from Louis Red Corn at Tulsa World in response to my request for clarification shows that the fact that an eminent-domain condemnation action hasn’t been filed, or that there is no “intent” to file, is really a distinction without a difference:
i am unclear on what you want from me. Clarification about what? I can tell you that no eminent domain action has been filed against that church (or against two other churches and a host of houses and businesses), though it is certainly understood that the city of (I assume she meant “is”) determined to get the church property. and I believe that the O’Reilly Auto Parts store is actually slated for demolition.
I have utterly no control over our website and how stories are released. Sorry about that. I am not fond of subscription sites myself, but the higher ups here take their copyright very seriously.
So now it’s more than one church (the status of the O’Reilly store has been changed to “UNCLEAR” in the original post).
Look, folks, it’s the threat of eminent domain and the fact that Kelo makes it easier for the government to take control of property that is the important thing here, not whether the actual eminent-domain filings have occurred, or for that matter whether they ever will occur.
Of course, the Vision 2025 implementers (who are, remember, “determined” to get the properties) don’t “intend” to file eminent domain, unless there’s resistance, and of course they hope there is none. Thanks to Kelo, it becomes more likely that there will be no resistance, because the chances of beating an eminent domain action have been lowered to near-zero. Only someone who is willfully blind would conclude that if the church, now churches, end up selling under government-induced duress (and let’s not forget the targeted houses and businesses), that the Supreme Court’s Kelo ruling will have had nothing to do with it.
_______________________________
UPDATE: I received a copy of the Tulsa World article in an e-mail, and it does indeed state that two other churches are involved, or, as Ms. Red Corn writes, “destined to be cleared.”
_______________________________
UPDATE 2: I e-mailed Heather Wilhelm of Americans for Limited Government, the author of the National Review Online article that led to my first post on the Sand Springs situation, and received this response. It (of course) confirms that the eminent-domain threat is the government’s trump card:
On Friday, the city issued a rather amusing press release denying that eminent domain was in play. Their reason? It hasn’t happened….yet.
I’m quoting from them directly:
“We are working with the residents, business owners, churches and other interests involved to reach acceptable purchase offers for their properties,†said City Manager Loy Calhoun. “It is the goal of the City Council and the Sand Springs Development Authority to complete the acquisition process voluntarily…Eminent domain has not occurred and could only occur as a last step.â€
The reverend has been told-—at city council meetings and, now, in a Meeting that he has on tape-—that this is a done deal, and that the only thing under negotiation is the price.
If this isn’t eminent domain, that would be fabulous news–because it would mean that the reverend gets to keep his church. Unfortunately, that’s not the case, as he’s been told repeatedly.
UPDATE, Jan. 24: Received this today in an e-mail from Tim Farley, who I verified is the managing editor of the Sand Springs Leader –
City manager Loy Calhoun has never ruled out eminent domain. In fact, a story published in our paper on Sunday quotes Calhoun as saying eminent domain has not been ruled out and neither has the idea of leaving the church alone and letting the development occur around it.
It does remain a possibility if things can’t be worked out. For any city official to say it won’t occur is irresponsible.
FYI: Calhoun announced his resignation a couple of weeks ago and will be leaving his job at the end of June.