<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bush Will Propose Line-Item Veto</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bizzyblog.com/2006/03/06/bush-will-propose-line-item-veto/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bizzyblog.com/2006/03/06/bush-will-propose-line-item-veto/</link>
	<description>The Business End of the Blogosphere</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 19:54:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: TBlumer</title>
		<link>http://www.bizzyblog.com/2006/03/06/bush-will-propose-line-item-veto/#comment-5459</link>
		<dc:creator>TBlumer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2006 15:44:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bizzyblog.com/?p=1584#comment-5459</guid>
		<description>#2, I'm as surprised as you are that the AP reporter found constitutional scholars who appeared confident that the Bush version of LIV is constitutional, but there it is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#2, I&#8217;m as surprised as you are that the AP reporter found constitutional scholars who appeared confident that the Bush version of LIV is constitutional, but there it is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Meckler</title>
		<link>http://www.bizzyblog.com/2006/03/06/bush-will-propose-line-item-veto/#comment-5458</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Meckler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2006 14:38:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bizzyblog.com/?p=1584#comment-5458</guid>
		<description>I &lt;a href="http://red-state.com/0306/030706.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;don't see how this proposal will pass constitutional muster&lt;/a&gt;, either. It all seems very gimmicky to me, a way to deflect attention from the fact that this Congress and this president have allowed spending to spiral out of control.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I <a href="http://red-state.com/0306/030706.html" rel="nofollow">don&#8217;t see how this proposal will pass constitutional muster</a>, either. It all seems very gimmicky to me, a way to deflect attention from the fact that this Congress and this president have allowed spending to spiral out of control.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven J. Kelso Sr.</title>
		<link>http://www.bizzyblog.com/2006/03/06/bush-will-propose-line-item-veto/#comment-5445</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven J. Kelso Sr.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Mar 2006 21:46:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bizzyblog.com/?p=1584#comment-5445</guid>
		<description>Let's pass this as part of a constitutional amendment requiring a balanced budget. This seems too much like a ploy and no, I have little faith that Mr. Bush -- or Republicans running for reelection -- will stop the pork.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s pass this as part of a constitutional amendment requiring a balanced budget. This seems too much like a ploy and no, I have little faith that Mr. Bush &#8212; or Republicans running for reelection &#8212; will stop the pork.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
