<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Financial Transparency for Thee, But Not For Me at The New York Times</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bizzyblog.com/2006/03/08/financial-transparency-for-thee-but-not-for-me-at-the-new-york-times/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bizzyblog.com/2006/03/08/financial-transparency-for-thee-but-not-for-me-at-the-new-york-times/</link>
	<description>The Business End of the Blogosphere</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 15:50:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: foreign devil</title>
		<link>http://www.bizzyblog.com/2006/03/08/financial-transparency-for-thee-but-not-for-me-at-the-new-york-times/#comment-5792</link>
		<dc:creator>foreign devil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Mar 2006 22:50:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bizzyblog.com/?p=1587#comment-5792</guid>
		<description>I can't understand why it's happening.  To say that Pinch is left wing is one thing but is he financially suicidal too?  Why do they persist in this feckless drive to get the President by every lame-brained scheme.  Only the Wiley Coyote gets it wrong more often.  And the Times has just as much success every time they drag out Abu Ghraib or some other tired accusation.  They are a parody of themselves now.  I'd believe The National Enquirer before I'd believe The New York Times!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t understand why it&#8217;s happening.  To say that Pinch is left wing is one thing but is he financially suicidal too?  Why do they persist in this feckless drive to get the President by every lame-brained scheme.  Only the Wiley Coyote gets it wrong more often.  And the Times has just as much success every time they drag out Abu Ghraib or some other tired accusation.  They are a parody of themselves now.  I&#8217;d believe The National Enquirer before I&#8217;d believe The New York Times!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TBlumer</title>
		<link>http://www.bizzyblog.com/2006/03/08/financial-transparency-for-thee-but-not-for-me-at-the-new-york-times/#comment-5517</link>
		<dc:creator>TBlumer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2006 00:49:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bizzyblog.com/?p=1587#comment-5517</guid>
		<description>#3, you raise a good point, but I think the numbers will show that the other two NYC papers have stayed at about the same level or declined slightly since 1993, vs. the NYT which is down 27% in Metro NY.

I don't see why the NYT should more affected by Google and Yahoo than the other two papers, which would have to be the case for that argument to fly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#3, you raise a good point, but I think the numbers will show that the other two NYC papers have stayed at about the same level or declined slightly since 1993, vs. the NYT which is down 27% in Metro NY.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t see why the NYT should more affected by Google and Yahoo than the other two papers, which would have to be the case for that argument to fly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nykrindc</title>
		<link>http://www.bizzyblog.com/2006/03/08/financial-transparency-for-thee-but-not-for-me-at-the-new-york-times/#comment-5514</link>
		<dc:creator>nykrindc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2006 23:11:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bizzyblog.com/?p=1587#comment-5514</guid>
		<description>I would be interested to know how much that drop in readership has to do with the advent of news websites like Google, Yahoo and others which give you the same news without having to buy a newspaper, or the fact that you don't have to pay to read NY Times stories on the web, except for those Time Select columns. That is, does their declining paper based share of the market truly reflect a decline, or do they have a significant share of online readership that just doesn't pay for the paper hard copy version of the times?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would be interested to know how much that drop in readership has to do with the advent of news websites like Google, Yahoo and others which give you the same news without having to buy a newspaper, or the fact that you don&#8217;t have to pay to read NY Times stories on the web, except for those Time Select columns. That is, does their declining paper based share of the market truly reflect a decline, or do they have a significant share of online readership that just doesn&#8217;t pay for the paper hard copy version of the times?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Decision &#8216;08  &#187; Blog Archive   &#187; Behind The Times: Do Numbers Lie?</title>
		<link>http://www.bizzyblog.com/2006/03/08/financial-transparency-for-thee-but-not-for-me-at-the-new-york-times/#comment-5504</link>
		<dc:creator>Decision &#8216;08  &#187; Blog Archive   &#187; Behind The Times: Do Numbers Lie?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2006 15:10:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bizzyblog.com/?p=1587#comment-5504</guid>
		<description>[...] f the NY Times, first by Thomas Lifson and Jack Risko of the American Thinker, and then in this followup at BizzyBlog, complete with a very illuminating stock performance chart&#8230;   						 							 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] f the NY Times, first by Thomas Lifson and Jack Risko of the American Thinker, and then in this followup at BizzyBlog, complete with a very illuminating stock performance chart&#8230;  </p>
<p> [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Driscoll.com</title>
		<link>http://www.bizzyblog.com/2006/03/08/financial-transparency-for-thee-but-not-for-me-at-the-new-york-times/#comment-5486</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Driscoll.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2006 00:53:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bizzyblog.com/?p=1587#comment-5486</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Just 'Cause They're Number Three, Don't Expect Them To Try Harder&lt;/strong&gt;

Found via Bizzy Blog, Thomas Lifson and Jack Risko of The American Thinker go deep inside the New York Times' financial numbers. This factoid is particularly intreguing:The Times has seen its comparable core metropolitan circulation decline by 27% sin...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Just &#8216;Cause They&#8217;re Number Three, Don&#8217;t Expect Them To Try Harder</strong></p>
<p>Found via Bizzy Blog, Thomas Lifson and Jack Risko of The American Thinker go deep inside the New York Times&#8217; financial numbers. This factoid is particularly intreguing:The Times has seen its comparable core metropolitan circulation decline by 27% sin&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
