David Smith for Senate signs have popped up in the strangest places during the past week (all of the following were seen while driving on Northbound Interstate 71):
- Underneath the Exit sign to Kenwood Road.
- Underneath the Exit sign to Montgomery Road.
- Underneath the Exit sign to Pfeiffer Road (pictured below).

- Underneath the Exit sign to Interstate 275.
- Underneath the Exit sign to Mason-Montgomery and Fields-Ertel Roads.
I contacted the Ohio Department of Transportation (ODOT) to confirm what I thought was obvious (and it is): The sign placements on interstate and limited-access highways anywhere (except at the very end of exit ramps onto regular-access roads, and except at the very beginning of regular-access road entrance ramps onto interstate and limited-access highways) ARE ILLEGAL. The placement at I-71 and I-275 is especially outrageous because it is at the intersection of TWO interstate highways. Pulling over and getting out of a car, an SUV, or a Smith Botmobile on an interstate highway for ANY non-emergency reason is illegal, and (I thought this was obvious) dangerous.
I informed an ODOT person at the Cincinnati local office about the signs at the above locations. I would hope that the signs are removed and unceremoniously disposed of soon. We can thank David Smith and his campaign for the expenditure of taxpayer dollars necessary to clean up his mess.
I would encourage anyone who encounters similar illegal sign placements in Greater Cincinnati (no matter whose campaign it is) to contact ODOT’s local office at 821-1409, and elsewhere in Southwest Ohio to contact the District office at 800-831-2142.
I have a call into the ODOT District to see if they can inform me about the penalty for sign placements of this nature, and will let you know if I learn anything.
________________________
Addendum: I’m a bit conflicted over those signs being removed. After all, the longer they’re present, the longer they scream “We’re ignorant, lawbreaking campaign novices.”
And how about the fact that Mr. Smith has had two previous congressional campaigns(*) to learn the basics of political sign placement, and hasn’t?
(*) - OH 2005 and TN 2004; UT 2002 wouldn’t count because it was a party nominating convention and not a public campaign.
_______________________
UPDATE: For the overly curious — The picture was taken by a passenger using a digital camera while I drove in the highway’s right lane at a few miles below the speed limit. No laws were broken in the course of obtaining the above picture, nor were any animals harmed. I suppose I could have argued that getting out of the car to take a picture would have been legal, as electing Bill Pierce to the Senate, and keeping David Smith out, constitutes a legitimate emergency situation, but I resisted.
UPDATE 2: In response to smart-aleck “Get a life” commenter below, here is one law provision that would apply (bold is mine):
ORC § 5516.02. Limitation of advertising devices along interstate highways.
No advertising device shall be erected or maintained within six hundred sixty feet of the edge of the right-of-way of a highway on the interstate system except the following:
(A) Directional and official signs and notices that conform to rules adopted by the director of transportation;
(B) Signs advertising the sale or lease of the property upon which they are located;
(C) Advertising devices indicating the name of the business or profession conducted on such property or that identify the goods produced, sold, or services rendered on such property, and that conform to rules adopted by the director;
(D) Advertising devices that are located in commercial or industrial zones traversed by segments of the interstate system within the boundaries of a municipal corporation as such boundaries existed on September 21, 1959, and that conform to rules adopted by the director;
(E) Advertising devices that are located on the premises of a professional sports facility and that conform to rules adopted by the director.
+++++++++++++
ORC § 5516.99. Penalties.
Whoever erects or maintains an advertising device in violation of sections 5516.01 to 5516.14 of the Revised Code, or rules adopted thereunder, shall be fined not less than one hundred nor more than five thousand dollars.
I like the 5 thou better than the hundred bucks. :–>
Perhaps my “get a life” commenter wouldn’t mind picking up the fines for the Smith campaign? After all, an amount between $500 and $25,000 to you isn’t such “a big deal.”
Bigger point — Now correct me if I’m wrong — A Senator when taking the oath of office swears to uphold the Constitution. If a candidate, in the interest of furthering his ambitions, won’t even uphold a simple state law ….. geez, do I even need to finish the sentence?
UPDATE 3: On the way up I-71 north from UC today, I saw three more totally illegal Smith signs I hadn’t seen before:
- at about the 3.6 mile marker where the ramp from McMillan blends with I-71 (i.e., about 1000 feet from McMillan).
- under the exit sign at Dana Avenue (Exit 5).
- under the exit sign at Cross County Highway (exit 14).
So the David R. Smith Fine-o-Meter is up to eight signs, with potential fines of beween $800 and $40,000. And please don’t tell me as a commenter did below that this is an isolated Smithbot acting totally on his or her own.
As to my “agenda,” imagine that. I think Bill Pierce is better than a resume-fudging and multiple promise-breaking candidate who manages to have the only campaign that I’ve seen in 30-plus years placing signs so obviously illegally on interstate highways. What a surprise.
UPDATE 4, April 12: Right Angle Blog posts on this, and e-mails in this usual pithy style — “unreal!”