May 1, 2006

Porkopolis’s Election-Eve Questions for Mike DeWine (050106)

Filed under: Economy, Soc. Sec. & Retirement, Taxes & Government — TBlumer @ 8:55 am

Back in December, some S.O.B. Alliance members, and members to be, used Mike DeWine’s vote against ANWR drilling as an opportunity to endorse. Porkopolis used it as an opportunity to unload, and did he ever.

Porkopolis did the dirty work and asked our incumbent senator six as-yet unanswered questions.

On this Primary Election Eve, I think it would be a good idea to bring ALL SIX of Porkopolis’s questions to everyone’s attention. These are questions that our incumbent senator has not and will not answer, all of which indicate just how out of touch he is with anything even resembling conservatism.

So here are all six Porkopolis Pre-Election Questions:

  1. Why are you supporting the give-away of government land to lobbying groups?
  2. Why are you cosponsoring a huge new government entitlement with Ted Kennedy?
  3. Why do you allow your Senatorial colleagues to propose legislation that will affect the returns of Ohio Public Employee Retirees?
  4. Why are you blocking Pension Benefit Guarantee Corp reform?
  5. Why did you vote against Senator Coburn’s amendment to limit pork barrel spending earmarks?
  6. What’s the deal with the $176,000 in farm subsidies you’re personally benefitting from?

Don’t wait for answers from Mike DeWine that aren’t going to come. And PLEASE, let’s not subject ourselves to another six years of Mike DeWine’s faux conservatism. Instead, vote for fiscal conservative Bill Pierce on May 2, and you won’t be asking your senator questions like the ones above six years from now.

Don’t forget to visit Bill’s site, his blog, and his Contribute page.

Pierce Bumper
____________________________

NOTE: I have endorsed Bill Pierce for Senate, and have provided nominal financial support for his campaign. BizzyBlog is a member of Blogs for Pierce.

No Comments »

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment (moderated)