Comments on: Six BIG Reasons to Reject the McEwen Candidacy (Never Mind the Large Number of “Less Serious” Ones) http://www.bizzyblog.com/2006/05/01/six-big-reasons-to-reject-the-mcewen-candidacy-never-mind-the-myriad-less-serious-ones/ The Business End of the Blogosphere Mon, 06 Oct 2008 13:11:44 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5 By: Ben Dover http://www.bizzyblog.com/2006/05/01/six-big-reasons-to-reject-the-mcewen-candidacy-never-mind-the-myriad-less-serious-ones/#comment-8715 Ben Dover Tue, 02 May 2006 13:51:29 +0000 http://www.bizzyblog.com/?p=2010#comment-8715 By the way Brian, remember how you are on Bob McEwen's payroll? (Check the FEC disbursements page) How could you even begin to talk about bias. I guess you learned your hypocrizy from Bob, so I can't really blame you. By the way Brian, remember how you are on Bob McEwen’s payroll? (Check the FEC disbursements page) How could you even begin to talk about bias. I guess you learned your hypocrizy from Bob, so I can’t really blame you.

]]> By: Anon http://www.bizzyblog.com/2006/05/01/six-big-reasons-to-reject-the-mcewen-candidacy-never-mind-the-myriad-less-serious-ones/#comment-8708 Anon Tue, 02 May 2006 12:42:35 +0000 http://www.bizzyblog.com/?p=2010#comment-8708 Doh! Bravo, Tom! Doh! Bravo, Tom!

]]> By: TBlumer http://www.bizzyblog.com/2006/05/01/six-big-reasons-to-reject-the-mcewen-candidacy-never-mind-the-myriad-less-serious-ones/#comment-8600 TBlumer Tue, 02 May 2006 03:06:39 +0000 http://www.bizzyblog.com/?p=2010#comment-8600 #1 Brian I also notice that you're following McEwen SOP, which is never to respond directly, and attempt to change the subject. It's my post and my blog. If you can't provide substantive responses to the six reasons listed, I don't have to respond beyond my already-more-courteous-than-required response on what you've said re Schmidt. You see, I posted first. No partial credit. Respond to all six. If you can't blow EVERY SINGLE ONE out of the water, don't come back to this post. #1 Brian I also notice that you’re following McEwen SOP, which is never to respond directly, and attempt to change the subject.

It’s my post and my blog. If you can’t provide substantive responses to the six reasons listed, I don’t have to respond beyond my already-more-courteous-than-required response on what you’ve said re Schmidt.

You see, I posted first. No partial credit. Respond to all six. If you can’t blow EVERY SINGLE ONE out of the water, don’t come back to this post.

]]> By: TBlumer http://www.bizzyblog.com/2006/05/01/six-big-reasons-to-reject-the-mcewen-candidacy-never-mind-the-myriad-less-serious-ones/#comment-8599 TBlumer Tue, 02 May 2006 03:00:15 +0000 http://www.bizzyblog.com/?p=2010#comment-8599 Brian see this comment re the Highland County voting law violations (I have to admit I AM biased against them): http://www.bizzyblog.com/?p=2003#comment-8597 Everything else (even the other 5 McEwen items) are not as important as violating the sanctity of the vote, though the Amway matter could end up being bigger down the road, with or without McEwen. You know, if a Dem had done what McEwen did in Highland County he or she would be skewered into political oblivion in about 30 minutes. I have to wonder who is biased when I see thousands of people who should know better allow him to skate on this. I've criticized Schmidt here: http://www.bizzyblog.com/?p=1921 If that's not strong enough for you, I am so not sorry. Brian see this comment re the Highland County voting law violations (I have to admit I AM biased against them):
http://www.bizzyblog.com/?p=2003#comment-8597

Everything else (even the other 5 McEwen items) are not as important as violating the sanctity of the vote, though the Amway matter could end up being bigger down the road, with or without McEwen.

You know, if a Dem had done what McEwen did in Highland County he or she would be skewered into political oblivion in about 30 minutes. I have to wonder who is biased when I see thousands of people who should know better allow him to skate on this.

I’ve criticized Schmidt here:

http://www.bizzyblog.com/?p=1921

If that’s not strong enough for you, I am so not sorry.

]]> By: brian burgess http://www.bizzyblog.com/2006/05/01/six-big-reasons-to-reject-the-mcewen-candidacy-never-mind-the-myriad-less-serious-ones/#comment-8595 brian burgess Tue, 02 May 2006 02:35:09 +0000 http://www.bizzyblog.com/?p=2010#comment-8595 Tom, I just read your entry re: McEwen and the six reasons. And I can only conclude that you are so biased that you can't even see straight. I know you aren't a fan of the Whistleblower, but I'd love to get your take on the Pathological video from a day or so ago clearly catching Jean Schmidt red-handed lying about her degre by blaming her web designer. She did it again on 700WLW today. I have the audio and I've seen copies of the newspaper from 1989. How do you excuse that? I just want to get your honest reaction to what is obviously one of the biggest lies of the campaign - and one that the Democrats will punish Jean Schmidt for should she be fortunate enough to get a pass from the voters tomorrow. Her comments were so obviously false that I'm quite certain someone will file yet another compaint with the OEC for making false statements in THIS campaign. Thanks, Brian Tom,

I just read your entry re: McEwen and the six reasons. And I can only conclude that you are so biased that you can’t even see straight.

I know you aren’t a fan of the Whistleblower, but I’d love to get your take on the Pathological video from a day or so ago clearly catching Jean Schmidt red-handed lying about her degre by blaming her web designer. She did it again on 700WLW today. I have the audio and I’ve seen copies of the newspaper from 1989. How do you excuse that?

I just want to get your honest reaction to what is obviously one of the biggest lies of the campaign - and one that the Democrats will punish Jean Schmidt for should she be fortunate enough to get a pass from the voters tomorrow. Her comments were so obviously false that I’m quite certain someone will file yet another compaint with the OEC for making false statements in THIS campaign.

Thanks,

Brian

]]>