Just Voted. Turnout So Far — VERY Light
At my Warren County precinct at the others using the same building, turnout was very low 4-1/2 hours into voting. Read into that what you will.
At my Warren County precinct at the others using the same building, turnout was very low 4-1/2 hours into voting. Read into that what you will.
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

| M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| « Apr | Jun » | |||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 |
| 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 |
| 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 |
| 29 | 30 | 31 | ||||








I hold no illusions regarding Pierce’s slim chances, but I have hope:
-poor weather reduces the turnout, only the motivated will go vote.
-not many people are going to be motivated to vote for Dewine
-but a lot of people are motivated to vote for pierce, as well as vote against dewine
I’m predicting it’ll be a stronger than expected showing for Pierce. Whether or not it’ll be enough remains to be seen.
Comment by Chublogga — May 2, 2006 @ 12:30 pm
#1, I’m with you TOTALLY on that.
Comment by TBlumer — May 2, 2006 @ 12:34 pm
As is to be expected around noon, my polling station in Sharonville was absolutely empty. I did notice something curious on my way back to work, however. Looked like some McEwen backers were standing in front of a polling station in Mason stopping voters on their way in. Not sure what the laws are regarding this, but I’d expect nothing less from not-so-Slim Shady.
Comment by Chucko — May 2, 2006 @ 1:47 pm
That depends on distance, and it’s very likely fine, though I believe they may not be allowed to be first to speak or to give any impression of impeding a person’s path — would have to research.
Comment by TBlumer — May 2, 2006 @ 2:34 pm