May 5, 2006

DeWine Joins Arlen Specter’s Coalition of the Snookered on Kavanaugh

Filed under: Taxes & Government — TBlumer @ 1:15 pm

The question is whether there was any need for a second hearing on the judicial nomination of Brett Kavanaugh.

There was supposedly a commitment from Republicans on the Judiciary Committee not to allow this to happen and to have an up-or-down vote out of the committee on Wednesday.

Trouble is “Republican commitment” is an oxymoron in the Senate Judiciary Committee (HT Rush Limbaugh’s site):

Chairman Specter’s stated reason for agreeing to a second hearing is—get this!—that Senator Schumer said that a hearing could be useful in persuading him to vote for Kavanaugh. No sooner had Specter said this than Schumer proceeded to label Kavanaugh a “partisan warrior” and attack his fitness to be a judge. Unless Kavanaugh is lobotomized between now and May 11, there is zero prospect that Schumer will vote for Kavanaugh’s nomination. Expect instead that he and his fellow Democrats will use the hearing to ask invasive questions Kavanaugh can’t possibly answer and to demand sensitive documents that the White House can’t provide—all of which will then set the stage for demands for further delay.

Although it’s tempting to blame Specter for this delay, a committee staffer tells me that Senators Graham and DeWine—members of the Gang of 14—worked hard to persuade Specter that another hearing would ensure that Democrat members of the Gang of 14 wouldn’t support a filibuster. We’ll see.

Why find out? This is not an exercise in conflict-avoidance above all else. If that’s what the Gang of 14 is all about, the nominations backlog will never get cleared out.

I hope this doesn’t end up being the first of gazillion “Don’t blame me, I voted for Pierce” posts.
___________________________

UPDATE: Patterico agrees (”Gang of 14 Deal Still Doing Damage”) — “The time to strike is now. Unfortunately, the Gang of 14 deal makes that difficult, because the threat of a filibuster continues to loom over qualified candidates like Kavanaugh.”

2 Comments

  1. Is anyone in America–other than the Kool-Aid Drinking Left–impressed with the Democrats in the Judiciary Committee?

    The Democrats never miss an opportunity to miss an opportunity. In this case: to shut up.

    They’re going to go out and bloviate like they always do, and once again the nominee is going to look like the smartest man in the room. All Brett’s got to do is keep his cool and try not to get too snarky in answering the questions.

    Comment by eLarson — May 5, 2006 @ 1:43 pm

  2. Don’t blame me, I voted for Pierce.

    Comment by Steven J. Kelso Sr. — May 5, 2006 @ 4:24 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.