<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Electric Cars Have Always Failed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bizzyblog.com/2006/06/29/why-electric-cars-have-always-failed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bizzyblog.com/2006/06/29/why-electric-cars-have-always-failed/</link>
	<description>The Business End of the Blogosphere</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 14:29:02 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: TBlumer</title>
		<link>http://www.bizzyblog.com/2006/06/29/why-electric-cars-have-always-failed/#comment-47965</link>
		<dc:creator>TBlumer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Nov 2006 18:45:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bizzyblog.com/?p=2498#comment-47965</guid>
		<description>#7, with all due respect, GM would be interested in ANY kind of idea that would make money, since the company as a whole hasn't been.

There's also nothing stopping anyone from starting up and electric car business.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#7, with all due respect, GM would be interested in ANY kind of idea that would make money, since the company as a whole hasn&#8217;t been.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s also nothing stopping anyone from starting up and electric car business.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Burr</title>
		<link>http://www.bizzyblog.com/2006/06/29/why-electric-cars-have-always-failed/#comment-47951</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Burr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Nov 2006 17:16:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bizzyblog.com/?p=2498#comment-47951</guid>
		<description>We all know e- cars need to be charged up.But for city traffic ? whats wrong with it ?It would cut down on smog.GM cannot make enough money on them. Is that the reason ? Only three moving parts as opposed to 750 in a gasoline engine!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We all know e- cars need to be charged up.But for city traffic ? whats wrong with it ?It would cut down on smog.GM cannot make enough money on them. Is that the reason ? Only three moving parts as opposed to 750 in a gasoline engine!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Apeweek</title>
		<link>http://www.bizzyblog.com/2006/06/29/why-electric-cars-have-always-failed/#comment-24601</link>
		<dc:creator>Apeweek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2006 15:46:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bizzyblog.com/?p=2498#comment-24601</guid>
		<description>#5, Yes, my wife and I each have a car, so we have a gas car too, for the occasional cross-state trips. I use the EV for commuting and most other driving, though, to save those gas dollars. As you might imagine, it's a bit of a hobby as well. The car looks very novel, and attracts stares and questions every day.

The outlet for the car is 220v, and separately metered, though I can also charge from 110 (a little slower.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#5, Yes, my wife and I each have a car, so we have a gas car too, for the occasional cross-state trips. I use the EV for commuting and most other driving, though, to save those gas dollars. As you might imagine, it&#8217;s a bit of a hobby as well. The car looks very novel, and attracts stares and questions every day.</p>
<p>The outlet for the car is 220v, and separately metered, though I can also charge from 110 (a little slower.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TBlumer</title>
		<link>http://www.bizzyblog.com/2006/06/29/why-electric-cars-have-always-failed/#comment-24512</link>
		<dc:creator>TBlumer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2006 05:41:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bizzyblog.com/?p=2498#comment-24512</guid>
		<description>#4 that does sound promising for limited use, but I guess that's the point -- people aren't looking for limited use. Maybe in some cases they should.

How does the utility know you're putting electricity in your car and not your TV? What kind of outlet is it? regular, 220, other?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#4 that does sound promising for limited use, but I guess that&#8217;s the point &#8212; people aren&#8217;t looking for limited use. Maybe in some cases they should.</p>
<p>How does the utility know you&#8217;re putting electricity in your car and not your TV? What kind of outlet is it? regular, 220, other?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Apeweek</title>
		<link>http://www.bizzyblog.com/2006/06/29/why-electric-cars-have-always-failed/#comment-24511</link>
		<dc:creator>Apeweek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2006 05:03:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bizzyblog.com/?p=2498#comment-24511</guid>
		<description>You know, if you can put up with the range thing, there are a whole bundle of other advantages.

I bought a used EV and fixed it up. Total cost, $6000. Old technology, so my range is limited. But the batteries are cheap. About $800 for the pack, and with care, they can last me nearly 8 years. That amount is about what my other vehicle costs just for oil changes. (4 X $25 for 8 years.)

My electric utility has a special 'EV rate' of 2.5 cents per KWH. I get about 4 miles per KWH, so my 1300 miles of monthly driving only costs me $8. Yes, EIGHT dollars. In my other 18 mpg car, that would cost me $224 for the gasoline.

Picture of my car here:

http://www.austinev.org/evalbum/775

Also, interesting Chinese import, out next year:

http://www.milesautomotive.com/products_xs200.html

200 mile range, 80mph, MSRP $28500.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, if you can put up with the range thing, there are a whole bundle of other advantages.</p>
<p>I bought a used EV and fixed it up. Total cost, $6000. Old technology, so my range is limited. But the batteries are cheap. About $800 for the pack, and with care, they can last me nearly 8 years. That amount is about what my other vehicle costs just for oil changes. (4 X $25 for 8 years.)</p>
<p>My electric utility has a special &#8216;EV rate&#8217; of 2.5 cents per KWH. I get about 4 miles per KWH, so my 1300 miles of monthly driving only costs me $8. Yes, EIGHT dollars. In my other 18 mpg car, that would cost me $224 for the gasoline.</p>
<p>Picture of my car here:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.austinev.org/evalbum/775" rel="nofollow">http://www.austinev.org/evalbum/775</a></p>
<p>Also, interesting Chinese import, out next year:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.milesautomotive.com/products_xs200.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.milesautomotive.com/products_xs200.html</a></p>
<p>200 mile range, 80mph, MSRP $28500.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Valuethinker</title>
		<link>http://www.bizzyblog.com/2006/06/29/why-electric-cars-have-always-failed/#comment-20100</link>
		<dc:creator>Valuethinker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2006 09:13:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bizzyblog.com/?p=2498#comment-20100</guid>
		<description>London is crawling with electric cars.

http://www.goingreen.co.uk/

They work, are convenient and economical.  Biggest problem is absence of a recharging infrastructure.

With a range of 40km they go anywhere inside a city of 8.5 million people.

Electric cars work in dense cities.

Remember most families now have 2 cars, so the discussion is about 'second cars' rather than about 'first cars'.  

The scale of the global warming problem is so large that radical solutions will have to be envisaged.  Electric cars aren't a bad place to start-- even if the recharging comes from coal fired stations, they still do considerably better on the CO2 scales than your average petrol driven vehicle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>London is crawling with electric cars.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.goingreen.co.uk/" rel="nofollow">http://www.goingreen.co.uk/</a></p>
<p>They work, are convenient and economical.  Biggest problem is absence of a recharging infrastructure.</p>
<p>With a range of 40km they go anywhere inside a city of 8.5 million people.</p>
<p>Electric cars work in dense cities.</p>
<p>Remember most families now have 2 cars, so the discussion is about &#8217;second cars&#8217; rather than about &#8216;first cars&#8217;.  </p>
<p>The scale of the global warming problem is so large that radical solutions will have to be envisaged.  Electric cars aren&#8217;t a bad place to start&#8211; even if the recharging comes from coal fired stations, they still do considerably better on the CO2 scales than your average petrol driven vehicle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russell Nelson</title>
		<link>http://www.bizzyblog.com/2006/06/29/why-electric-cars-have-always-failed/#comment-19971</link>
		<dc:creator>Russell Nelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2006 05:58:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bizzyblog.com/?p=2498#comment-19971</guid>
		<description>The range problem is solvable:  http://www.ruf.dk/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The range problem is solvable:  <a href="http://www.ruf.dk/" rel="nofollow">http://www.ruf.dk/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LargeBill</title>
		<link>http://www.bizzyblog.com/2006/06/29/why-electric-cars-have-always-failed/#comment-18450</link>
		<dc:creator>LargeBill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2006 22:12:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bizzyblog.com/?p=2498#comment-18450</guid>
		<description>Electric cars are good . . . . . for about two rounds of golf.  :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Electric cars are good . . . . . for about two rounds of golf.  :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
