Is Lance Armstrong Becoming the Rodney Dangerfield of Cycling?
There are early signs that Lance Armstrong is indeed turning into cycling’s Rodney Dangerfield — despite an alltime record seven consecutive Tour de France victories, he’s getting no respect.
In a BBC article about American Floyd Landis’s Tour de France triumph on Sunday, there are two strange tidbits.
Here’s the first:
Despite Armstrong’s all-time record of seven consecutive wins, Tour de France director Jean-Marie Leblanc hailed Landis’ ride as “the best performance in the modern history of the Tour”.
Landis’s comeback was spectacular and exciting, but “the best”? When the only way Armstrong could have lost when he had commanding leads in the final days of at least two of his wins (and had totally demoralized his rivals), was if he fell?
Then there’s this one:
And on the following day he (Landis) clawed back all but 30 seconds of that lost time with a remarkable solo break, leading for 120 of the 200km to Morzine to evoke memories of Eddy Merckx, arguably the Tour’s greatest ever winner.
Whoa. I suppose you could argue that Merckx was the “greatest rider” in tour history on the basis of competing against stronger competition, but that’s not what the article says. Armstrong has won more Tours than anyone else, and is by definition its “greatest ever winner.”
Three-time tour winner and fellow American Craig LeMond piled on a bit too (about halfway through linked page):
Lemond has certainly not hidden his feelings on Armstrong, and when asked who would win today between Landis, him and Armstrong, Lemond at first chuckled, “I am biased! I can’t answer that, [laughs.]” But then Lemond got a little more serious. “Every race is different. The race changed dramatically this year. For me I am a strong anti-doping advocate. I think we are seeing a true Tour de France winner, someone who might have otherwise been cheated out of a win.”
When asked if he was saying Lance’s wins were tainted, Lemond said, “I am not saying that. It goes back to the historical norms, where people got tired and had bad days. It was common to have a bad day when I was racing. I have been waiting for this period since 1998… The French riders are competitive since 1998. They have a much harder dope testing in their country. Watching a race that shows the human drama. I believe you can do the TdF without drugs, you get tired, and the strongest win.”
What’s interesting about LeMond’s statement is that it was an open secret that Tour course designers during Armstrong’s final years specifically schemed to make things tougher on Armstrong, obviously failing miserably.
I can’t remember when a champion of Armstrong’s magnitude has gotten the back-of-the-hand treatment from part of the press and fellow athletes so soon. Yes, I know there have been the drug and blood-doping whispers, but there has to my knowledge never been any proof that he did either of these during his riding career. So you’ll have to excuse me if I don’t see the justification for what is clearly an attempt by some to downplay his unprecedented achievements.
_______________________________
UPDATE, July 27: It is intensely painful to report that Landis has flunked a drug test. A second sample will be tested before the finding is finalized.









