A “Widespread Practice” Kills a Child — And No One Pays
There isn’t a large enough bold-faced font to show you how angry this makes me.
Add this special delivery from the UK’s National Health Service (NHS) to the “deadly perils of nationalized health care” file:
The NHS scandal that cost a young boy’s life
12:11pm 22nd August 2006
Earlier this month, leading orthopaedic surgeon Simon Moyes, who put patients at risk of infections by re-using surgical equipment, escaped punishment after it was claimed such practices are widespread in the NHS due to cost cutting. It was news that shattered the Clowes family, whose nine-year-old son Tony died exactly five years ago this month after (a) breathing apparatus was reused in what should have been a minor operation.
The UK’s Daily mail interviewed Tony’s father George:
He says: “After reading about Simon Moyes in the newspaper last week, I was left feeling as though I’d been run over by a truck.
….. And to hear at the same time that the very practices that killed our son are still going on was shattering.
After Tony’s death, we were promised that lessons would be learned, which, given this latest investigation, we find difficult to believe.
One of the consultants who gave evidence in support of Mr Moyes said it was common practice to reuse equipment because the NHS is so short of funds.
To us, the thought of doctors still risking people’s lives for the sake of a little penny pinching feels like a slur on Tony’s memory.
….. At the time of his death, he was in perfect health. He wouldn’t have ended up in hospital at all had he not lacerated his right index finger while trying to repair the chain of his bike.
….. I had no idea that as I flicked casually through magazines, doctors were struggling to save Tony’s life.
I thought in a couple of hours, Tony would be ready to go home and would be chatting away about the welcome back dinner his mother was making him.
The first I knew anything was wrong was about an hour later, when a doctor and his assistant came and found me and ushered me into a side room. He looked at me and said “I don’t know how to tell you this but there’s been an absolute disaster.”
Then he said that Tony had died. It was impossible to take in what they told me next. I listened in total disbelief as they told me that they’d discovered Tony wasn’t getting any oxygen through the breathing tube they’d put down his throat while he was under the general anaesthetic.
At first, after checking the breathing equipment and discovering it was all fine, they’d thought he’d had an allergic reaction to the anaesthetic drug.
So they’d started injecting him with a cocktail of other drugs, including adrenaline, in order to counter the anaesthetic.
It was only after other senior anaesthetists had rushed in to examine Tony, that one of the doctors finally lifted Tony’s mask and discovered one of the connectors inside it had slipped into the tubing and was blocking the airflow. Tony had suffocated to death.
….. We still can’t believe not only did they break guidelines but they didn’t do something as basic as mouth-to-mouth which would have saved his life.
….. If doctors continue to get away with such behaviour, then there will be little incentive for them to change their ways and more people will die as a result of NHS budgetary constraints.
Even five years on, we still miss Tony desperately. There is still a gaping hole in this family and although we have days now when we’re able to laugh, we will never be as happy as we once were.
Read the whole sickening thing.
So what’s the point of “free universal access” to medical care if this is what you and your loved ones get access to?
________________________________
UPDATE: Dean at Dean’s World relates a horror story with his lovely bride, and makes the point that indifference is not unique to nationalized systems. Fair enough — but I would suggest that the unsanitary and dangerous reuse of disposable items is NOT a widespread practice here as it has been found to be with the NHS. He also e-mailed and questioned why health care should be employer-based as it is in this country. That is of course an important issue. Employer involvement is an accident of history that goes back to World War II and evolved (or devolved) from there. Ideally, individuals should pay their own medical insurance and medical care costs, as with auto insurance, but getting from where we are to the ideal is going to be difficult (Medical Savings Accounts are the bridge). One thing that I believe experience shows won’t work is pretending that a government takeover of the healthcare system will be an improvement.
UPDATE 2: The Socialized Medicine blog posted on this and received this e-mail from a reader who said he/she is an anesthesiologist in a U.S. public hospital:
Local anesthesia can also be dangerous, or fatal, in the wrong hands. This boy was in the wrong hands. We have separate “ambu bags” to ventilate patients. If the machine malfunctions, we reach for the ambu bag, ventilate the patient, and then troubleshoot the machine. We have “pulse oximeters” to measure oxygen in the skin, and “end tidal carbon dioxide” to measure ventilation. Alarms are set to go offf if these become abnormal, as would occur if the ventilation circuit was blocked. In addition, the anesthetist should be observing the patient – obviously not the case here. The time of neglect must have been significant. A healthy patient has enough “reserve” oxygen that it would take a number of minutes to die even if the oxygen supply was cut off. In the USA, this would be negligence – plain and simple – and a multi million dollar out of court settlement.











Brit Health System Kills Boy…
In a nutshell, a doctor screws up, re-uses surgical equipment, a boy dies as a result, and there are no consequences because “everybody does it.” Bottom line — there are no funds for new equipment….
Trackback by Interested-Participant — August 22, 2006 @ 5:57 pm
wow. Every parents nightmare.
Let’s remember this the next time we are told that the USA spends too much (14%) of our GNP on healthcare.
We’ll spend as much as we please, thank you very much, because we can, and it’s our money and we demand not to die for stupid reasons.
Comment by Dave — August 22, 2006 @ 9:52 pm
“He wouldn’t have ended up in hospital at all had he not lacerated his right index finger …”
That’s all; just a finger cut?! Why did he need general anesthesia at all? At most, a local anesthestic would seem enough. Okay, it was a ‘deep gash’, but “I was expecting they’d stitch Tony’s finger back up and we’d be home in time for dinner.” They waited overnight, so it couldn’t have been too bad a gash. In the morning, they still “thought it was just a case of ..a few routine stitches.” Why a general anesthesia, and with a tube rather than just a mask, full to sleep rather than awake with a local anesthesia (like when the dentist numbs only one part of your mouth)? Was it really cost-cutting as the problem or out-dated practices and basic incompetence? Sounds like a local anesthesia ,and then also parent could have stayed in the room with the child. I’ve had stitches multiple times, including one a very deep gash, always stitched up with me still awake. Had a general anesthesia only once, but they sure gave you a lot of disclaimers about the risks before hand. Very very sad and disturbing.
Comment by cornfed — August 22, 2006 @ 10:47 pm
#3, I do not understand the general anesthesia either, and the questions you raise are very good ones.
Have training and other areas been so starved for so long that NHS still employs practices that date back to the 1970s (or earlier)?
Or are state-paid doctors so demotivated that they do not take steps to keep up with news developments — for DECADES?
A couple of commenters at the Daily Mail link raised the same question.
Comment by TBlumer — August 22, 2006 @ 10:57 pm
Heck, I remember getting sliced up as a kid and getting stitches, and it involved the very barest minimum of a local, injected anesthetic.
Still, you guys have got to consider that we will never get to this pass in the U.S., and this case will show why: when the govt is in charge of all health care, the ability to sue and receive damages is severely reduced.
Yup, the hated personal injury/tort lawyers will save us from this particular nightmare scenario.
It’s nice to know they’re good for =something=
Comment by meep — August 23, 2006 @ 7:28 am
#5, good point about the legal issue. HillaryCare may have had limitations on the right to sue, but I never learned definitively one way or the other.
Comment by TBlumer — August 23, 2006 @ 8:33 am
On the Problems of National Health Care–and Market Health Care…
BizzyBlog notes a horror story of nationalized health care in the UK.
I detract nothing from that horror story, for it……
Trackback by Dean's World — August 24, 2006 @ 12:05 am
Your first bolded paragraph made me angry enough that I couldn’t read on. We are so close to bringing such nonsense to America that it makes my hands shake.
Comment by Steven J. Kelso Sr. — August 24, 2006 @ 7:35 am