Weekend Question 1: Is This “Only” about Separation of Church and State?
NOTE: This will be Saturday’s last post.
___________________________________________
Answer: If you think it’s that narrow, you haven’t been paying enough attention.
Here’s the story (HT Family Research Council e-mail and J. Matt Barber at Renew America):
The Minneapolis Police Department has temporarily suspended the use of a well-known psychologist who has been screening potential officers for more than a year after community members questioned his affiliation with a group that opposes civil rights for gays.
The issue of Michael A. Campion’s affiliation with a conservative Illinois group that says it opposes the “gay lifestyle” was brought to interim Chief Tim Dolan’s attention on Wednesday during a meeting with the Police Community Relations Council.
Although he said there’s no indication of any bias in Campion’s work, Dolan decided the next day to stop using him until an independent review could take place.
This isn’t the first time Campion’s objectivity has been questioned. In 2003, nine applicants to the Springfield, Ill., Fire Department sued the city claiming they were unfairly disqualified by either background checks or Campion’s psychological evaluation. A judge dismissed the suit, but the Springfield City Council didn’t renew Campion’s contract last year.
“Everybody is entitled to their views. But we felt it would be hard to separate them when reviewing people,” said Frank McNeil, a Springfield alderman.
Campion’s business, which is based in Champaign, Ill., has performed psychological testing for 32 years for more than 100 law enforcement agencies, including St. Paul. Last month, Campion received high marks from a consulting firm hired by the Minneapolis Police Department to evaluate his “general procedural goodness and specific cultural fairness” of his testing procedures.
This is not about so-called “church-state separation,” an erroneous cliche that has become so embedded that even a sitting US Senator thinks church-state separation is in the “first words of the First Amendment in the Constitution” (News flash: It’s not). A specific religion isn’t mentioned in the excerpt, or anywhere else in the article.
It’s not about keeping religion out of the public square, either. The Illinois Family Institute (link did not work at the time this post was written) is described in the article as “a nonprofit group that says it advocates for religious freedom and opposes gay marriage, civil rights protection for gays, abortion and embryonic stem cell research.” At the very worst, that would appear to be “protected political activity.” Of course, punishing people for stating their religious beliefs is taking place — Go here for a story about someone fired from a transportation board job (!) for stating mainstream Catholic beliefs on television.
No, this is about shutting anyone who may not have the “correct” political or religious beliefs out of public employment or consulting. It appears that Mr. Campion hasn’t even opened his mouth in public either on or off the job; yet he’s still seen as potentially unacceptable by what Renew America’s Barber accurately describes as “The thought police of Minneapolis.” The thinking of the radical fringe of the gay-rights movement, which does not even reflect the views of the people it claims to represent, and hasn’t since at least the mid-1990s, has infected the City of Minneapolis, and is surely spreading.









