Comments on: Wikipedia Version 2: Promise and Peril http://www.bizzyblog.com/2006/09/20/wikipedia-version-2-promise-and-peril/ The Business End of the Blogosphere Tue, 16 Mar 2010 00:24:31 -0700 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8 hourly 1 By: TBlumer http://www.bizzyblog.com/2006/09/20/wikipedia-version-2-promise-and-peril/comment-page-1/#comment-31202 TBlumer Wed, 20 Sep 2006 17:03:18 +0000 http://www.bizzyblog.com/2006/09/19/wikipedia-version-2-promise-and-peril/#comment-31202 Exactamundo, Jeff. Exactamundo, Jeff.

]]> By: Jeff http://www.bizzyblog.com/2006/09/20/wikipedia-version-2-promise-and-peril/comment-page-1/#comment-31201 Jeff Wed, 20 Sep 2006 17:01:40 +0000 http://www.bizzyblog.com/2006/09/19/wikipedia-version-2-promise-and-peril/#comment-31201 What's interesting is here we are, two guys who basically agree with the article, outing its lack of objectivity. Just because it shares our biases doesn't mean we don't recognize that it IS biased. Would any two members of the MSM do the same? Would they even understand the principle at work here? That's why I increasingly trust bloggers more than the dinosaur media... we acknowledge our point of view from the outset. What’s interesting is here we are, two guys who basically agree with the article, outing its lack of objectivity. Just because it shares our biases doesn’t mean we don’t recognize that it IS biased. Would any two members of the MSM do the same? Would they even understand the principle at work here?

That’s why I increasingly trust bloggers more than the dinosaur media… we acknowledge our point of view from the outset.

]]> By: TBlumer http://www.bizzyblog.com/2006/09/20/wikipedia-version-2-promise-and-peril/comment-page-1/#comment-31199 TBlumer Wed, 20 Sep 2006 16:40:57 +0000 http://www.bizzyblog.com/2006/09/19/wikipedia-version-2-promise-and-peril/#comment-31199 Geez, though the negative points appear to be valid (except that one about EITC, which I find VERY hard to believe), the person's not even trying to be objective. Geez, though the negative points appear to be valid (except that one about EITC, which I find VERY hard to believe), the person’s not even trying to be objective.

]]> By: Jeff http://www.bizzyblog.com/2006/09/20/wikipedia-version-2-promise-and-peril/comment-page-1/#comment-31197 Jeff Wed, 20 Sep 2006 16:29:04 +0000 http://www.bizzyblog.com/2006/09/19/wikipedia-version-2-promise-and-peril/#comment-31197 Tom, try this one on: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Refund_Anticipation_Loan I was preparing another post about Refund Anticipation Loans, which you and I both think are a terrible deal. As much as I counsel people against them, the anti-RAL bias in the wikipedia entry is astonishing. Tom, try this one on:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Refund_Anticipation_Loan
I was preparing another post about Refund Anticipation Loans, which you and I both think are a terrible deal. As much as I counsel people against them, the anti-RAL bias in the wikipedia entry is astonishing.

]]>