<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ted Strickland&#8217;s 1999 &#8216;Present&#8217; Vote on H CON RES 107 &#8212; Part 3: The Reason Why He Said He Opposed It</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bizzyblog.com/2006/10/10/ted-stricklands-1999-present-vote-on-h-con-res-107-part-3-the-reason-why-he-said-he-opposed-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bizzyblog.com/2006/10/10/ted-stricklands-1999-present-vote-on-h-con-res-107-part-3-the-reason-why-he-said-he-opposed-it/</link>
	<description>The Business End of the Blogosphere</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 00:53:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: NixGuy.com &#187; Civility vs. Integrity</title>
		<link>http://www.bizzyblog.com/2006/10/10/ted-stricklands-1999-present-vote-on-h-con-res-107-part-3-the-reason-why-he-said-he-opposed-it/#comment-41582</link>
		<dc:creator>NixGuy.com &#187; Civility vs. Integrity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Oct 2006 13:17:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bizzyblog.com/2006/10/10/ted-stricklands-1999-present-vote-on-h-con-res-107-part-3-the-stated-reason-he-opposed-it-and-my-conversation-with-him-about-it/#comment-41582</guid>
		<description>[...] Stand by your convictions, even the politically unpopular ones. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Stand by your convictions, even the politically unpopular ones. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NixGuy.com &#187; Backlash! Oh no!</title>
		<link>http://www.bizzyblog.com/2006/10/10/ted-stricklands-1999-present-vote-on-h-con-res-107-part-3-the-reason-why-he-said-he-opposed-it/#comment-37714</link>
		<dc:creator>NixGuy.com &#187; Backlash! Oh no!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Oct 2006 13:58:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bizzyblog.com/2006/10/10/ted-stricklands-1999-present-vote-on-h-con-res-107-part-3-the-stated-reason-he-opposed-it-and-my-conversation-with-him-about-it/#comment-37714</guid>
		<description>[...] To who? You? Please. Much evidence to the contrary, but even so why is his vote, his rant on the floor and his current explanation &#8220;off limits&#8221;? Shouldn&#8217;t his persuasive explanation be reported in the context of the vote? It is clear that members of the House confronted with the resolution were intimidated into voting for it because not to do so would have brought wild accusations of their being soft on pedophiles. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] To who? You? Please. Much evidence to the contrary, but even so why is his vote, his rant on the floor and his current explanation &#8220;off limits&#8221;? Shouldn&#8217;t his persuasive explanation be reported in the context of the vote? It is clear that members of the House confronted with the resolution were intimidated into voting for it because not to do so would have brought wild accusations of their being soft on pedophiles. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
