October 11, 2006

It Took About 12 Hours

Filed under: News from Other Sites, Taxes & Government — TBlumer @ 2:19 pm

….. for the first condescending smear and bogus accusation of slander to appear relating to the Strickland 1999 “Present” vote posts.

__________________________________

UPDATE: It took about 34 hours for someone to do an extensive outraged post on the series without linking back — heaven forbid that his readers see what the person being criticized actually wrote. And folks, this is the SECOND (not the 10th) time the issue is being brought up statewide. It first surfaced in with Strickland’s underfunded and underblogged opponent in the primary. It is totally unknown to the vast majority of Ohioans. The non-linking tells me that the writer is afraid the issue will resonate.

5 Comments

  1. Slander? I don’t think that word means what he thinks it means.

    Comment by dave — October 11, 2006 @ 8:49 pm

  2. To him, it means “anything negative and factual about the candidate I support.”

    Comment by TBlumer — October 12, 2006 @ 12:21 am

  3. ???? I linked to your post in the text (”If you’re so inclined, read about the latest allegations and their alleged background here”). I can give you a plug in a separate post, if you wish, in case anyone else missed the “here” link.

    Glad to hear you didn’t slander Ted. In misrepresenting the APA study as pro-pedophile and calling Ted out for not condemning it, you are neither calling Ted pro-pedophile nor attempting to harm his reputation.

    Thanks for explaining that.

    I’ll put up another, more elaborate, link to your site. I’ll call my post “Link to site.”

    Lee

    Comment by Lee Hartsfeld — October 12, 2006 @ 2:58 am

  4. Once again, the deafening silence of the Media is matched only by the feigned outrage by leftists. The practitioners of personal destruction based on no more than innuendo are all of a sudden circling the wagons around their standard bearer’s outrage that 99%+ of Congress doesn’t support the alternative lifestyle of pedophilia.

    Comment by Joe C. — October 12, 2006 @ 6:43 am

  5. #3, Oops, Lee H (referred to #3 earlier), I do not think Strickland supports pedophilia, I think he could not handle his congressional colleagues questioning the judgment of his psych profession colleagues who allowed the publication of the research study.

    I cannot get to Blogger; will have to look at later. I would suggest linking to or copying the one-minutes speech where he in essence calls his congressional colleagues a technically unqualified pack of liars.

    Comment by TBlumer — October 12, 2006 @ 8:58 am

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.