Welcome Cunningham Listeners
Thanks to Willie for the mention.
Go here (at Whiskey Tango Foxtrot) and here (my own post) to see yesterday’s posts and documents relating to the Vic Wulsin “Nuke Waste Dump” Deception.
Also, go to this post from this morning to see about the request for investigation Victoria Wulsin’s involvement with malariotherapy and other matters sent to the Ohio Medical Board earlier today.
________________________
IMPORTANT CLARIFICATION: In response to a caller, Willie used this Schmidt quote to give the impression that she is neutral on the idea of a nuke waste dump:
Schmidt has made it clear that she’s not advocating for or against the plan, but she thinks it should be considered, especially since it could bring thousands of jobs to the economically distressed region.
The quote is correct; the context is not. That is because, as shown in yesterday post, in separate letters sent to Wulsin and Schmidt from the plant’s USW union, “the plan” does not consider a nuke “waste dump” or “disposal site” an option in any way, shape, or form.
ALSO: Here is the audio of my call into Willie yesterday (infinite thanks to Matt at Weapons of Mass Discussion for capturing it). Topics covered: Why 527 Media bias, though unprecedented in its severity, is not as big of a problem as in the past; the Zogby poll released earlier in the week showing Blackwell down to Strickland by 7.5% (I erroneously said 7.3%); and information about the Wulsin “Nuke Waste Dump” Deception.
Terrific clarification: Schmidt says she’s neither for or against the plan. USU’s USW local says Schmidt is against the Radioactive Waste Dump. Schmidt, herself just won’t say.
Wulsin’s against the Dump.
Comment by Mike Roser — November 3, 2006 @ 4:40 pm
#1, that is why they are doing a site analysis, and why Schmidt will not conclude until one is done. Good grief.
The idea of a *dump* is a figment of the imagination of Victoria Wulsin, and is now a figment of the imaginations of her hysterical imaginations of her supporters, as the union letters to her and Schmidt PROVE to all but those who will not read.
Comment by Tom Blumer — November 4, 2006 @ 12:32 am