The Final Three of 57 Reasons to Reject the Ohio Learn & Earn Initiative (110606; Plus a Directory)
Well, here we are, at the final three of 57. Heinz would be proud. :–>
From Jill at Writes Like She Talks (original entry relating to Jill’s effort is here):
- Reason 3 — “….. because I don’t like being intimidated by the proponents of Issue 3, who are the most likely to gain and the least likely to lose if Issue 3 passes, while those who are put forth as the ones the proponents are trying to benefit - the education interests - remain either silent or opposed to Issue 3.”
- Reason 2 — (paraphrasing) “because there has to be something wrong with a ballot measure when you can come up with 10 economic reasons, 13 social reasons, 15 legal reasons, 8 reasons based on principle, 7 argumentative reasons, and 4 personal reasons why it should be voted down.”
I will split the final reason in two — Jill’s and mine:
- Reason 1 (Jill) — “Because I want to vote no. ….. don’t play me for a fool. Don’t tell me that this is the best we can do. And don’t tell me it’s for the kids.”
- Reason 1 (Tom) — “Because if two people from the opposite sides of the blogosphere who don’t agree on a whole lot else (but on more than you might think) can agree on 56 reasons, and even more reasons surface while those 56 are being presented, it can’t possibly be a good thing to vote for.”
Vote NO on Issue 3. Tell everyone you know it’s a bad, bad idea.
_______________________
PREVIOUS REASONS:
At WLST: #57, #56, #55, #54,
#53, #52, #51, #50, #49,
#48, #47, #46, #45, #44.
At BizzyBlog (all contain links back to WLST originals):
#43 - #41, #40 - #38,
#37 - #35, #34 - #32,
#31 - #29, #28 - #26,
#25 - #23, #22 - #20,
#19 - #17, #16 - #14,
#13, #12 - #10, #9 - #4










Rejected.
Comment by Ohio 2nd — November 7, 2006 @ 9:53 am
#1, that’s a start.
Comment by TBlumer — November 7, 2006 @ 10:12 am
Thanks, Tom. It’s been a pleasure. Well, sort of. :)
Comment by Jill — November 9, 2006 @ 7:04 pm
#3, I feel your pleasure/pain.
Comment by TBlumer — November 9, 2006 @ 7:12 pm