<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: If It&#8217;s Bluster, It&#8217;s Getting More Convincing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bizzyblog.com/2006/12/11/if-its-bluster-its-getting-more-convincing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bizzyblog.com/2006/12/11/if-its-bluster-its-getting-more-convincing/</link>
	<description>The Business End of the Blogosphere</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 06:13:18 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: TBlumer</title>
		<link>http://www.bizzyblog.com/2006/12/11/if-its-bluster-its-getting-more-convincing/comment-page-1/#comment-58297</link>
		<dc:creator>TBlumer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 14:24:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bizzyblog.com/2006/12/11/if-its-bluster-its-getting-more-convincing/#comment-58297</guid>
		<description>#1, I basically agree. This is above the curiosity level primarily because of the JPost paras that disappeared, though I think that WND has a better track record than most give it credit for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#1, I basically agree. This is above the curiosity level primarily because of the JPost paras that disappeared, though I think that WND has a better track record than most give it credit for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: meep</title>
		<link>http://www.bizzyblog.com/2006/12/11/if-its-bluster-its-getting-more-convincing/comment-page-1/#comment-58238</link>
		<dc:creator>meep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 11:13:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bizzyblog.com/2006/12/11/if-its-bluster-its-getting-more-convincing/#comment-58238</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure why it&#039;s more convincing just because well-known liars are sticking to a particular story. Yes, there are a couple Dems who have decided to do a little freelance diplomacy (to put it mildly) before, so I&#039;m not saying the story is unbelievable. It&#039;s just that I like to see hard evidence...

...too bad that photographs are not hard evidence, at least coming from Hamas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure why it&#8217;s more convincing just because well-known liars are sticking to a particular story. Yes, there are a couple Dems who have decided to do a little freelance diplomacy (to put it mildly) before, so I&#8217;m not saying the story is unbelievable. It&#8217;s just that I like to see hard evidence&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8230;too bad that photographs are not hard evidence, at least coming from Hamas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
