Oops, she did it again yesterday at CPAC (though there is context everyone is ignoring, the remark referred to at the Hot Air link was inexcusable. March 4 — So where’s the outrage over this? March 4 — Well said, Dean Barnett. March 5 — Barnett, yet again).
Nevertheless, Coulter has had a couple of her best columns in years during the past few weeks. In this one from Wednesday, she really has the enviro movement pegged, using her patented over-the-top rhetoric (but not over the line, as her CPAC comment Friday was) to make sad-but-true points (internal link added by me):
….. Because of the industrialization of agriculture — using massive amounts of fossil fuel — only 2 percent of Americans work in farming. And yet they produce enough food to feed all 300 million Americans, with plenty left over for export. When are liberals going to break the news to their friends in Darfur that they all have to starve to death to save the planet?
“Global warming” is the left’s pagan rage against mankind. If we can’t produce industrial waste, then we can’t produce. Some of us — not the ones with mansions in Malibu and Nashville is my guess — are going to have to die. To say we need to reduce our energy consumption is like saying we need to reduce our oxygen consumption.
Liberals have always had a thing about eliminating humans. Stalin wanted to eliminate the kulaks and Ukranians, vegetarian atheist Adolf Hitler wanted to eliminate the Jews, Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger wanted to eliminate poor blacks, DDT opponent Rachel Carson wanted to eliminate Africans (introduction to her book “Silent Spring” written by … Al Gore!), and population-control guru Paul Ehrlich wants to eliminate all humans.
But global warming is the most insane, psychotic idea liberals have ever concocted to kill off “useless eaters.” If we have to live in a pure “natural” environment like the Indians, then our entire transcontinental nation can only support about 1 million human beings. Sorry, fellas — 299 million of you are going to have to go.
Proving that the “global warming” campaign is nothing but hatred of humanity, these are the exact same people who destroyed the nuclear power industry in this country 30 years ago.
If we accept for purposes of argument their claim that the only way the human race can survive is with clean energy that doesn’t emit carbon dioxide, environmentalists waited until they had safely destroyed the nuclear power industry to tell us that. This proves they never intended for us to survive.
“Global warming” is the liberal’s stalking horse for their ultimate fantasy: The whole U.S. will look like Amagansett, with no one living in it except their even-tempered maids (for “diversity”), themselves and their coterie (all, presumably, living in solar-heated mansions, except the maids who will do without electricity altogether). The entire fuel-guzzling, tacky, beer-drinking, NASCAR-watching middle class with their over-large families will simply have to die.
The biggest point Coulter hits on: Whether or not they like it, or whether or not they even acknowledge it, even environmental “true believers” who don’t agree with Biz Weak letter writer Steven Wascher (featured at this post last week) about “what environmentalists dare not say aloud” — that there has to be “a substantial reduction in global population” — are going to find themselves moving inexorably in that direction if they get everything they want. Yes, they, will.
_______________________________________
UPDATE: The list of a dozen enviro leading lights enumerated at this link admits to substantial worldwide population reduction as a goal, or a wish. These are not fringe players. Why should I not take them at their word?