<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Well, Isn&#8217;t This Special? Munitions Found Last Year Were Officially WMDs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bizzyblog.com/2007/04/02/well-isnt-this-special-munitions-found-last-year-were-official-wmds/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bizzyblog.com/2007/04/02/well-isnt-this-special-munitions-found-last-year-were-official-wmds/</link>
	<description>The Business End of the Blogosphere</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 17:48:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: TBlumer</title>
		<link>http://www.bizzyblog.com/2007/04/02/well-isnt-this-special-munitions-found-last-year-were-official-wmds/#comment-113351</link>
		<dc:creator>TBlumer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 12:58:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bizzyblog.com/2007/04/04/well-isnt-this-special/#comment-113351</guid>
		<description>#1, obviously in â€œpopularâ€ perception only -- not in official proceedings. They fit the recognized definition of WMDs.

The premise that the statement the â€œthere were no WMDs in Iraqâ€ has thus been shown (again) to be objectively not true.

Game over (again, and again, and again....).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#1, obviously in â€œpopularâ€ perception only &#8212; not in official proceedings. They fit the recognized definition of WMDs.</p>
<p>The premise that the statement the â€œthere were no WMDs in Iraqâ€ has thus been shown (again) to be objectively not true.</p>
<p>Game over (again, and again, and again&#8230;.).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.bizzyblog.com/2007/04/02/well-isnt-this-special-munitions-found-last-year-were-official-wmds/#comment-113350</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 12:54:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bizzyblog.com/2007/04/04/well-isnt-this-special/#comment-113350</guid>
		<description>Ah, yes.  The "Santorum Cache".  Yes, this was widely reported, widely refuted...back in June.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, yes.  The &#8220;Santorum Cache&#8221;.  Yes, this was widely reported, widely refuted&#8230;back in June.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
