<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Food Stamp Follies: Oregon Governor&#8217;s Publicity Stunt, and the Reporting on It, Are Both Wrong on the Facts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bizzyblog.com/2007/04/28/food-stamp-follies-oregon-governors-publicity-stunt-and-reporting-on-it-are-wrong-on-the-facts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bizzyblog.com/2007/04/28/food-stamp-follies-oregon-governors-publicity-stunt-and-reporting-on-it-are-wrong-on-the-facts/</link>
	<description>The Business End of the Blogosphere</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 14:41:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: TBlumer</title>
		<link>http://www.bizzyblog.com/2007/04/28/food-stamp-follies-oregon-governors-publicity-stunt-and-reporting-on-it-are-wrong-on-the-facts/#comment-114503</link>
		<dc:creator>TBlumer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 04:02:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bizzyblog.com/2007/04/28/food-stamp-follies-oregon-governors-publicity-stunt-and-reporting-on-it-are-wrong-on-the-facts/#comment-114503</guid>
		<description>#2, of course he is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#2, of course he is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scrapiron</title>
		<link>http://www.bizzyblog.com/2007/04/28/food-stamp-follies-oregon-governors-publicity-stunt-and-reporting-on-it-are-wrong-on-the-facts/#comment-114502</link>
		<dc:creator>Scrapiron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 04:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bizzyblog.com/2007/04/28/food-stamp-follies-oregon-governors-publicity-stunt-and-reporting-on-it-are-wrong-on-the-facts/#comment-114502</guid>
		<description>The governor wouldn't happen to be a brain dead democrat would he?
You an convince (in ten minutes) an otherwise honest person to rob a bank if they are a democrat. Try it, it works 99 44/100 % of the time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The governor wouldn&#8217;t happen to be a brain dead democrat would he?<br />
You an convince (in ten minutes) an otherwise honest person to rob a bank if they are a democrat. Try it, it works 99 44/100 % of the time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NixGuy.com &#187; Food Stamp Horror: Oops</title>
		<link>http://www.bizzyblog.com/2007/04/28/food-stamp-follies-oregon-governors-publicity-stunt-and-reporting-on-it-are-wrong-on-the-facts/#comment-114473</link>
		<dc:creator>NixGuy.com &#187; Food Stamp Horror: Oops</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2007 11:32:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bizzyblog.com/2007/04/28/food-stamp-follies-oregon-governors-publicity-stunt-and-reporting-on-it-are-wrong-on-the-facts/#comment-114473</guid>
		<description>[...] I earlier posted this story about the governor of Oregons publicity stunt for food stamps.Â  I foolishly assumed that the essential facts of the story (21$) were accurate.Â  I mean no one would lie about something so easily checked right?Â  Foolish me.Â  Well, Bizzyblog took a closer look at the Food Stamp program and discovered that the governor fudged the facts for sensationalism. If $21 is indeed the correct per-person per-week Food Stamp benefit in Oregon, the example that immediately follows the table at the linked Fact Sheet page makes it perfectly clear that the $21 is what remains AFTER a person or family on Food Stamps has contributed what the Program believes they can contribute towards buying food from their own resources (a fairly complex calculation that is beyond the scope of this post, except of course to note its existence). It is definitely NOT what â€œthe stateâ€™s average food stamp recipient spends weekly on groceries.â€ The Programâ€™s table assumes that Food Stamp recipients will spend more, and itâ€™s reasonable to assume that many if not most recipients do indeed spend more. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] I earlier posted this story about the governor of Oregons publicity stunt for food stamps.Â  I foolishly assumed that the essential facts of the story (21$) were accurate.Â  I mean no one would lie about something so easily checked right?Â  Foolish me.Â  Well, Bizzyblog took a closer look at the Food Stamp program and discovered that the governor fudged the facts for sensationalism. If $21 is indeed the correct per-person per-week Food Stamp benefit in Oregon, the example that immediately follows the table at the linked Fact Sheet page makes it perfectly clear that the $21 is what remains AFTER a person or family on Food Stamps has contributed what the Program believes they can contribute towards buying food from their own resources (a fairly complex calculation that is beyond the scope of this post, except of course to note its existence). It is definitely NOT what â€œthe stateâ€™s average food stamp recipient spends weekly on groceries.â€ The Programâ€™s table assumes that Food Stamp recipients will spend more, and itâ€™s reasonable to assume that many if not most recipients do indeed spend more. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
