Illinois Dodges a Bullet Ohio Has Already Taken, and Won’t Remove
A subscription-only Wall Street Journal editorial Monday covered the humiliating rejection last (I think 107-0 is pretty humiliating) of Illinois Governor Blagojevich’s attempt to impose “universal health care” and pay for it with a “gross receipts tax.”
Although the details were apparently pretty fluid during the proposal’s short life, here is where it stood at one point — “The gross receipts tax would apply at the rates of 0.5% for manufactured goods and 1.8% for service-based businesses.” It would have replaced the income tax, and at the time the linked post was written, would have exempted the first $1 million in revenues.
The Journal’s take, supported by Tax Foundation research (here and here) should be required reading for Ohio legislators who think enacting the Commercial Activities Tax (CAT - Ohio’s name for its gross receipts tax) was a good idea:
As tax increases go, this was one of the worst. A “gross receipts tax” is popular with politicians because it applies to every dollar of company revenue, not merely on profits, or on final sales the way a retail sales tax does. But this means the tax tends to hit hardest those small and medium-sized businesses that have healthy sales volumes but narrow profit margins. The tax is a huge revenue-raiser but can also be a job killer.
….. And because the tax applies to all business transactions, it creates what economists call a “pyramiding” effect that has a damaging overall economic impact.
Chicago Mayor Dictator for Life Daley was quoted thusly by the Journal:
“To describe every major CEO in Illinois as fat cats is a mistake,” said Chicago Mayor Daley. “They don’t have to be here. They can go to Wisconsin. They can go to Indiana. They can go to India. They can go to China. So if you want to beat up businesses, go beat ‘em up, and when they leave, just wave to ‘em and they’re going to wave back to you.”
Then there’s the question of where expanding business locate. Honda decided to build its new plant in Greensburg, Indiana. I believed at the time, and still believe, that a significant factor in the decision was the fact that Indiana had a gross receipts tax years ago and got rid of it, while Ohio decided to impose one for the first time.
Everyone in the Ohio House appears to be patting themselves on the back in Columbus for passing a conflict-free budget. Yet instead of killing the CAT cancer, it will be allowed to grow. Other Midwestern states are surely pleased.









