<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Couldn&#8217;t Help But Notice (052307)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bizzyblog.com/2007/05/23/couldnt-help-but-notice-052307/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bizzyblog.com/2007/05/23/couldnt-help-but-notice-052307/</link>
	<description>The Business End of the Blogosphere</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 09:11:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Cornfed</title>
		<link>http://www.bizzyblog.com/2007/05/23/couldnt-help-but-notice-052307/#comment-114824</link>
		<dc:creator>Cornfed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 15:26:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bizzyblog.com/2007/05/23/couldnt-help-but-notice-052307/#comment-114824</guid>
		<description>I agree with Mr. Blumer: There are ways to guarantee public safety without resorting to it, i.e. to capital punishment; e.g. by life without parole.  Therefore, cap punishment is not necessary in the US [besides, the appeals by cap punishment lawyers likely uses a disproportionate amount of court attention]. I similarly lack confidence in the legal system, esp over the long-term.  Any system is imperfect.  Since cap punishment is permanant, it is out of place in an imperfect system.  Life in prison allows for a belated proof of innocence (or reasonable doubt) should be allowed for by the due process system; such as via technology (DNA, etc) or via dissipation of mob moods (The Fugitive).

By the way, I did not mean to imply anything about the abortion policy with comment #1.  I was just curious if this was a single issue group -- abortion politicians -- or if they extended a 'right to life' issue theme across related issues.  Thanks for the reply with Comment #2 info.  Very helpful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Mr. Blumer: There are ways to guarantee public safety without resorting to it, i.e. to capital punishment; e.g. by life without parole.  Therefore, cap punishment is not necessary in the US [besides, the appeals by cap punishment lawyers likely uses a disproportionate amount of court attention]. I similarly lack confidence in the legal system, esp over the long-term.  Any system is imperfect.  Since cap punishment is permanant, it is out of place in an imperfect system.  Life in prison allows for a belated proof of innocence (or reasonable doubt) should be allowed for by the due process system; such as via technology (DNA, etc) or via dissipation of mob moods (The Fugitive).</p>
<p>By the way, I did not mean to imply anything about the abortion policy with comment #1.  I was just curious if this was a single issue group &#8212; abortion politicians &#8212; or if they extended a &#8216;right to life&#8217; issue theme across related issues.  Thanks for the reply with Comment #2 info.  Very helpful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rose</title>
		<link>http://www.bizzyblog.com/2007/05/23/couldnt-help-but-notice-052307/#comment-114813</link>
		<dc:creator>Rose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 22:05:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bizzyblog.com/2007/05/23/couldnt-help-but-notice-052307/#comment-114813</guid>
		<description>LB, thank you...some folks have a problem discerning b/w apples &#38; oranges.  Kind of like the old anti-gun "we're not pioneers anymore" argument.  Doesn't matter...we have a right to Life and a right to bear arms.  Period, end of report.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LB, thank you&#8230;some folks have a problem discerning b/w apples &amp; oranges.  Kind of like the old anti-gun &#8220;we&#8217;re not pioneers anymore&#8221; argument.  Doesn&#8217;t matter&#8230;we have a right to Life and a right to bear arms.  Period, end of report.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: largebill</title>
		<link>http://www.bizzyblog.com/2007/05/23/couldnt-help-but-notice-052307/#comment-114812</link>
		<dc:creator>largebill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 17:05:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bizzyblog.com/2007/05/23/couldnt-help-but-notice-052307/#comment-114812</guid>
		<description>Tom,

     Thanks for addressing the fake Catholic politicians.  I thought about blogging on the subject but couldn't decide which angle to beat up.  I can't remember who said it but one blogger noted that the congresscritters seemed to be accusing the Pontiff of being unAmerican.  As far as commenter #1, I hope he can understand there is a difference between society as a whole punishing someone guilty of murder and an individual killing an innocent child for being inconvenient.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom,</p>
<p>     Thanks for addressing the fake Catholic politicians.  I thought about blogging on the subject but couldn&#8217;t decide which angle to beat up.  I can&#8217;t remember who said it but one blogger noted that the congresscritters seemed to be accusing the Pontiff of being unAmerican.  As far as commenter #1, I hope he can understand there is a difference between society as a whole punishing someone guilty of murder and an individual killing an innocent child for being inconvenient.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TBlumer</title>
		<link>http://www.bizzyblog.com/2007/05/23/couldnt-help-but-notice-052307/#comment-114808</link>
		<dc:creator>TBlumer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 16:12:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bizzyblog.com/2007/05/23/couldnt-help-but-notice-052307/#comment-114808</guid>
		<description>#1, if you're saying that the Catholic Church unequivocally opposes the death penalty in all cases, you would be incorrect.

The Church would prefer that it be very rare.

US Bishops are leaning on the idea that there are ways to guarantee public safety without resorting to it (life without parole), and that cap punishment is not necessary in the US. I am not alone among those lacking such confidence in the legal system, esp over the long-term.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#1, if you&#8217;re saying that the Catholic Church unequivocally opposes the death penalty in all cases, you would be incorrect.</p>
<p>The Church would prefer that it be very rare.</p>
<p>US Bishops are leaning on the idea that there are ways to guarantee public safety without resorting to it (life without parole), and that cap punishment is not necessary in the US. I am not alone among those lacking such confidence in the legal system, esp over the long-term.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cornfed</title>
		<link>http://www.bizzyblog.com/2007/05/23/couldnt-help-but-notice-052307/#comment-114807</link>
		<dc:creator>Cornfed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 14:05:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bizzyblog.com/2007/05/23/couldnt-help-but-notice-052307/#comment-114807</guid>
		<description>Curious on the pro-life groups to Catholic politicians: Is there a similar letter for the death penalty to politician's votes?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Curious on the pro-life groups to Catholic politicians: Is there a similar letter for the death penalty to politician&#8217;s votes?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
