<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What the ???? (Stolen State Data Was NOT Encrypted)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bizzyblog.com/2007/06/19/what-the/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bizzyblog.com/2007/06/19/what-the/</link>
	<description>The Business End of the Blogosphere</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 09:23:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Columbuser.com / Strickland dribbling out stolen data details</title>
		<link>http://www.bizzyblog.com/2007/06/19/what-the/#comment-115538</link>
		<dc:creator>Columbuser.com / Strickland dribbling out stolen data details</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 15:26:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bizzyblog.com/2007/06/19/what-the/#comment-115538</guid>
		<description>[...] Here&#8217;s BizzyBlog: But in my opinion, the need for an independent investigation is there because we donâ€™t know who and what are causing the situation to continually mushroom. Itâ€™s making the governor (unfairly, in this case) look like a buffoon. To be finding out 10 days later that what was thought to be encrypted isnâ€™t, what was thought to be locked wasnâ€™t, and that the scope of what was stolen is still growing, is ridiculous. If the game-playing goes high enough (like to the governorâ€™s cabinet? or a handler?), any attempted internal investigation might be compromised. Itâ€™s better to have an independent investigation now and clean house than to either never get a handle on what happened or to have the truly guilty parties engineer some kind of fall-guy/gal result. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Here&#8217;s BizzyBlog: But in my opinion, the need for an independent investigation is there because we donâ€™t know who and what are causing the situation to continually mushroom. Itâ€™s making the governor (unfairly, in this case) look like a buffoon. To be finding out 10 days later that what was thought to be encrypted isnâ€™t, what was thought to be locked wasnâ€™t, and that the scope of what was stolen is still growing, is ridiculous. If the game-playing goes high enough (like to the governorâ€™s cabinet? or a handler?), any attempted internal investigation might be compromised. Itâ€™s better to have an independent investigation now and clean house than to either never get a handle on what happened or to have the truly guilty parties engineer some kind of fall-guy/gal result. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Columbuser.com / More on the stolen data tape</title>
		<link>http://www.bizzyblog.com/2007/06/19/what-the/#comment-115397</link>
		<dc:creator>Columbuser.com / More on the stolen data tape</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 16:13:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bizzyblog.com/2007/06/19/what-the/#comment-115397</guid>
		<description>[...] BizzyBlog had a post yesterday about the state&#8217;s stolen data tape not being encrypted, despite the fact that at least one state spokesman was quoted in one outlet saying that the date was encrypted. Bizzy sees three possibilities: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] BizzyBlog had a post yesterday about the state&#8217;s stolen data tape not being encrypted, despite the fact that at least one state spokesman was quoted in one outlet saying that the date was encrypted. Bizzy sees three possibilities: [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lincoln Logs &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Encryption: Another Strickland Foul Up</title>
		<link>http://www.bizzyblog.com/2007/06/19/what-the/#comment-115391</link>
		<dc:creator>Lincoln Logs &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Encryption: Another Strickland Foul Up</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 11:00:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bizzyblog.com/2007/06/19/what-the/#comment-115391</guid>
		<description>[...] BizzyBlog gets into the action on the lost state data.Â  I point to Bizzy, because I think he makes a good point.Â  He stayed out of the issue because he thought it was unfortunate.Â  The handling of the issue, however, by Governor Strickland has been so jumbled, he can remain silent no more.Â  Bizzy&#8217;s major issue at this point is the fact that the Strickland folks said the info was encrypted, but it wasn&#8217;t. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] BizzyBlog gets into the action on the lost state data.Â  I point to Bizzy, because I think he makes a good point.Â  He stayed out of the issue because he thought it was unfortunate.Â  The handling of the issue, however, by Governor Strickland has been so jumbled, he can remain silent no more.Â  Bizzy&#8217;s major issue at this point is the fact that the Strickland folks said the info was encrypted, but it wasn&#8217;t. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TBlumer</title>
		<link>http://www.bizzyblog.com/2007/06/19/what-the/#comment-115381</link>
		<dc:creator>TBlumer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 01:53:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bizzyblog.com/2007/06/19/what-the/#comment-115381</guid>
		<description>#3, that\'s a pretty big â€œexcept,â€ which if I were Ted and I had been tricked or misled into saying something untrue, Iâ€™d be seriously seething and lopping off some heads.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#3, that\&#8217;s a pretty big â€œexcept,â€ which if I were Ted and I had been tricked or misled into saying something untrue, Iâ€™d be seriously seething and lopping off some heads.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave</title>
		<link>http://www.bizzyblog.com/2007/06/19/what-the/#comment-115380</link>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 01:49:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bizzyblog.com/2007/06/19/what-the/#comment-115380</guid>
		<description>If I had to guess I'd say possibility #2 is most likely.

There's multiple layers of encryption that could have been involved.  The application could have encrypted it, the database could have it encrypted and the backup software itself could have encrypted it.

It's not shocking at all to me that it's not encrypted as the encryption comes at a cost of slower response times.  Oftentimes the easier thing to do is to take off the encryption especially when there isn't enough money to buy the required hardware.  Oops.

Still not Strickland's fault, except for trying to jump out in front without all the facts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I had to guess I&#8217;d say possibility #2 is most likely.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s multiple layers of encryption that could have been involved.  The application could have encrypted it, the database could have it encrypted and the backup software itself could have encrypted it.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not shocking at all to me that it&#8217;s not encrypted as the encryption comes at a cost of slower response times.  Oftentimes the easier thing to do is to take off the encryption especially when there isn&#8217;t enough money to buy the required hardware.  Oops.</p>
<p>Still not Strickland&#8217;s fault, except for trying to jump out in front without all the facts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TBlumer</title>
		<link>http://www.bizzyblog.com/2007/06/19/what-the/#comment-115378</link>
		<dc:creator>TBlumer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 01:01:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bizzyblog.com/2007/06/19/what-the/#comment-115378</guid>
		<description>#1, I'm thinking that an independent-counsel type investigation might be warranted to determine why data represented as encrypted for days wasn't.

That is totally apart from the state's back-up policy issues, and you know it (which is among the irritating things about your alleged lines of argument).

I hear Patrick Fitzgerald might be available soon....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#1, I&#8217;m thinking that an independent-counsel type investigation might be warranted to determine why data represented as encrypted for days wasn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>That is totally apart from the state&#8217;s back-up policy issues, and you know it (which is among the irritating things about your alleged lines of argument).</p>
<p>I hear Patrick Fitzgerald might be available soon&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.bizzyblog.com/2007/06/19/what-the/#comment-115377</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 00:51:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bizzyblog.com/2007/06/19/what-the/#comment-115377</guid>
		<description>I'm just happy we can now get the inept Republican backup policy from 2002 fixed.  We should all be glad in that.  You might have just missed that part.  I know you try to do a thorough job in your blogging.  No worries.  Maybe your independent investigation can get to the bottom of the backup policy problem.  Let's hope!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m just happy we can now get the inept Republican backup policy from 2002 fixed.  We should all be glad in that.  You might have just missed that part.  I know you try to do a thorough job in your blogging.  No worries.  Maybe your independent investigation can get to the bottom of the backup policy problem.  Let&#8217;s hope!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
