<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What the ???? (Ohio Data Theft Update; Time for an Independent Investigation)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bizzyblog.com/2007/06/20/what-the-ohio-data-theft-update/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bizzyblog.com/2007/06/20/what-the-ohio-data-theft-update/</link>
	<description>The Business End of the Blogosphere</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 09:46:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Columbuser.com / Strickland dribbling out stolen data details</title>
		<link>http://www.bizzyblog.com/2007/06/20/what-the-ohio-data-theft-update/#comment-115543</link>
		<dc:creator>Columbuser.com / Strickland dribbling out stolen data details</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 16:44:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bizzyblog.com/2007/06/20/what-the-ohio-data-theft-update/#comment-115543</guid>
		<description>[...] Here&#8217;s BizzyBlog: But in my opinion, the need for an independent investigation is there because we donâ€™t know who and what are causing the situation to continually mushroom. Itâ€™s making the governor (unfairly, in this case) look like a buffoon. To be finding out 10 days later that what was thought to be encrypted isnâ€™t, what was thought to be locked wasnâ€™t, and that the scope of what was stolen is still growing, is ridiculous. If the game-playing goes high enough (like to the governorâ€™s cabinet? or a handler?), any attempted internal investigation might be compromised. Itâ€™s better to have an independent investigation now and clean house than to either never get a handle on what happened or to have the truly guilty parties engineer some kind of fall-guy/gal result. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Here&#8217;s BizzyBlog: But in my opinion, the need for an independent investigation is there because we donâ€™t know who and what are causing the situation to continually mushroom. Itâ€™s making the governor (unfairly, in this case) look like a buffoon. To be finding out 10 days later that what was thought to be encrypted isnâ€™t, what was thought to be locked wasnâ€™t, and that the scope of what was stolen is still growing, is ridiculous. If the game-playing goes high enough (like to the governorâ€™s cabinet? or a handler?), any attempted internal investigation might be compromised. Itâ€™s better to have an independent investigation now and clean house than to either never get a handle on what happened or to have the truly guilty parties engineer some kind of fall-guy/gal result. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
