July 3, 2007

While Old Media Obsesses over Haditha, Al Qaeda Massacre in Iraq Gets the Silent Treatment

(WARNING: Link contains graphic and unsettling pictures) Michael Yon reported a massacre committed by Al Qaeda that wiped out a village on the outskirts of Baqubah, Iraq just after midnight on July 1.

Matt Hurley at Weapons of Mass Discussion had this to say yesterday in reaction:

If American media fails to cover this with the same amount of gusto that they have pursued Haditha and Abu Ghraib, they will be demonstrating their preference for whom they wish to win this conflict. The press has to tell the story that evil really does exist in this world. Imagine if the story of the Holocaust was never told because the media was only interested in reporting Allied atrocities. Yes, by failing to treat this war objectively, the media does indeed enable massacres such as this one and history will judge the coverage of this war very harshly.

Robin Boyd noticed the lack of Old Media interest in a NewsBusters post yesterday. Almost 18 hours later, the fact is that Old Media is still ignoring Yon’s dispatch:

GoogNewsYonBaqubah0707

The three items of the 10 listed not included in the above picutre also do not relate to the Al Qaeda-committed massacre.

That is indeed quite a contrast to Old Media’s treatment of the Haditha situation:

GoogNewsHaditha0707

I’d say 81 stories represents a bit of the “gusto” Hurley was referring to.

Can anyone come up with a reason why I should believe that Matt Hurley is wrong about whose side Old Media is on?

Cross-posted at NewsBusters.org.

__________________________________

UPDATE: This NewsBusters comment ties Old Media conduct into Old Media decline:

Every time the MSM ignores an important item like this another tenth of a percent of their circulation goes away.

And they wonder why they are slowly dying on the vine.

The Libby Clemency

Filed under: Taxes & Government — TBlumer @ 6:50 am

THIS is NOT a pardon:

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States of America, pursuant to my powers under Article II, Section 2, of the Constitution, do hereby commute the prison terms imposed by the sentence upon the said Lewis Libby to expire immediately, leaving intact and in effect the two-year term of supervised release, with all its conditions, and all other components of the sentence.

THESE are pardons. A major HT goes to Drudge for linking to the infamous list; historical context is very useful.

That historical context makes the reactions of most of the whiners snortworthy, with the grandest of prizes for chutzpah going to Hillary Clinton:

“This commutation sends the clear signal that in this administration, cronyism and ideology trump competence and justice.”

Pardonize and cronyize this, and especially this, Hillary:

President Clinton’s pardons have been a political issue for Hillary Clinton because of her ties to a number of the cases. In addition to the people who paid her brothers, those receiving pardons included commodities trader Marc Rich, a fugitive who was prosecuted for tax evasion by then-US Attorney Rudolph Giuliani and fled to Switzerland. Rich was pardoned after his former wife, Denise Rich, contributed heavily to Hillary Clinton’s Senate campaign.

Controversy over the pardons was reignited last week after Hollywood mogul and former Clinton supporter David Geffen criticized the Clintons for the Rich pardon.

Anyone who thinks that the Libby commutation is going to have a long-term political effect on anything or turn into a campaign issue is smoking what someone says he never inhaled (scroll to bottom at link). If someone tries to make it so, guess who it will hurt?

______________________________________

UPDATE: I agree with the contention that Bush should have gone with a real pardon — except See Update 2. If the appeals continue and the conviction is overturned, it will be a double victory for sanity.

UPDATE 2: The Cliff’s notes version of why Libby really deserved a pardon was laid out by Christopher Hitchens a couple of weeks ago. It’s Tim Russert’s word against Libby’s over a noncriminal matter. The whole thing is worth a read to get a full flavor for the extraoradinary hostility of the prosecutor and judge in this case. I’m assuming that the appeal of the conviction itself will continue, and believe it pretty likely that it will be thrown out on appeal.

Couldn’t Help But Notice (070307)

Filed under: Economy, Environment, Taxes & Government — TBlumer @ 6:07 am

An Inconvenient Invention (HT NewsBusters, noting lack of Old Media interest)?

A US company is taking plastics recycling to another level – turning them back into the oil they were made from, and gas.

All that is needed, claims Global Resource Corporation (GRC), is a finely tuned microwave and – hey presto! – a mix of materials that were made from oil can be reduced back to oil and combustible gas (and a few leftovers).

That “we’re running out of oil” argument, already woefully weak, gets ever weaker.

_________________________________________

A subscription-only Wall Street Journal editorial notes a Florida tax revolt, the consequences of out-of-control property taxes tied to home values, and a tax-relief measure that will be voted on statewide:

….. Governor Charlie Crist recently signed a $32 billion property tax relief plan — the biggest tax cut in Florida history, and reminiscent of California’s famous Proposition 13 tax cut initiative 29 years ago.

Florida family incomes have risen by a healthy 37% since 2001, but average property tax bills have climbed by 83%. In some communities, such as Boynton Beach, average property tax bills have tripled in seven years. Politicians tell of town hall meetings where angry constituents announce they are literally being taxed out of their homes. United Van Lines reports that, for the first time in many years, more American homeowners packed up and left Florida than arrived in 2006.

….. The catch is that this must be approved by 60% of the voters in a January 2008 ballot referendum. And already the liberal interests that feast on local spending — government employee unions, contractors and local politicians — are predicting Armageddon for schools and city services if the tax cuts are enacted. House Speaker Marco Rubio, who has led the charge for property tax relief, says local governments have already spent $24 million of taxpayer money to lobby against the initiative.

With many municipal budgets having doubled in size over the past eight years, many Floridians are unimpressed with these sudden exclamations of empty city wallets. Taxpayer groups point to numerous examples of flush spending by cities and counties in recent years, including $32 million for a new municipal golf course in Palm Beach — a county that already has 160 courses.

Far from being over, the property tax fight in Florida is just heating up. That’s also true in at least a dozen other states …..

Local pols throughout the country, when presented with tax windfalls, will continue to do what they’ve almost invariably done. They’ll spend the money, unless taxpayers rein them in.

_________________________________________

A different Wall Street Journal op-ed from last week by executives of The Yankee Institute notes that Connecticut is also in on the tax action, in this case beating back misguided increases proposed by Governor Jodi Rell (blogged on here back in February). Given the political makeup of the state and its legislature, it looked like there would be no stopping the increases. Surprise — It didn’t happen, and perhaps has larger implications:

(The governor) proposed hiking the state’s income tax by 10% (to 5.5% from 5%) to raise money for Hartford and other city school districts. And one idea kicking around the legislature was to create a new, higher tax bracket for “the wealthy.” In this case, a 6.95% income tax on top income earners (something those commuters to New York City would probably love). The government’s apparently limitless appetite for higher taxes comes at a time when the rainy day fund is topped out and the state is enjoying a $900 million surplus.

….. By the end of May, two months into our (anti-tax) campaign, Ms. Rell backed away from her own tax hike. In early June, the legislative session ended without an agreement on the state’s budget. A special negotiating session between Gov. Rell and legislators has just ended, and it contains no increase in the state’s income tax — something thought impossible just months ago.

Our experience challenges a widely held belief that it is difficult to have a political impact by taking a serious, complex argument to the general public. By combining the old sound-bite media of billboards and posters with a sophisticated Web site, the Yankee Institute did precisely that — and for a fraction of what it would cost to buy broadcast time.

The most interesting assumption we tested with our campaign, however, is the notion that the Northeast is hopelessly and (with the exception of New Hampshire) solidly liberal. What we’re finding is that even rank-and-file Democrats aren’t happy to pay more to get less in government services. Given a choice between dumping more money into a failing public school system or enacting cost-effective reforms like charter schools and merit pay for teachers, voters aren’t likely to throw good money after bad.

This article chronicling what happened notes that Governor Rell totally reversed field on income-tax increases, and even vetoed a budget in early June that contained them.

_________________________________________

A horrid example of voting-rights abuse – in black-ON-white. John Fund also notes how surveyed Americans feel about voter-ID laws:

Despite abundant evidence that protective measures such as photo ID and tighter controls on absentee ballots aren’t designed to suppress voter turnout, the civil rights establishment continues to resist against any effort to improve ballot integrity. Yet as former Atlanta mayor Andrew Young has noted, showing ID is a daily fact of life in America now, and getting such IDs in the hands of poor people would help them enter the mainstream of American life. A poll by the Wall Street Journal and NBC News last year found Americans backing a photo ID law by 80% to 7%, with two-thirds support among both blacks and Hispanics.

Positivity: Woman Saved Twice by Rochester Police

Filed under: Positivity — TBlumer @ 5:57 am

From Rochester, PA:

06/29/2007

A Rochester woman who was revived from cardiac arrest decades ago by Rochester police was saved a second time recently - again by Rochester police - when she went into cardiac arrest at her home.

On Sunday, Shirley Eady, 70, of 456 Harmony Ave. had just come back from the grocery store with her son’s girlfriend and settled at the kitchen table when she suddenly collapsed.

Her son Scott Eady said he had gone upstairs and heard his girlfriend calling him. Seeing his mother lying on the kitchen floor, Eady quickly began CPR, doing his best to bring her back.

“It wasn’t working so well,” Eady said.

His girlfriend, in the meantime, had called 911. It was 12:43 p.m. when Rochester police veteran Johnny Farmer got the call. Farmer was the first official to arrive and had with him one of the department’s two automated external defibrillator packs.

Sudden cardiac arrest occurs when the heart develops an arrhythmia, or abnormal heart rhythm, causing it to stop beating. Eady said his mother showed no vital signs - no heartbeat, no pulse, no breathing.

Farmer gave Shirley Eady a jolt to the chest. Two ambulance crews and other emergency officials began to arrive, including East Rochester Constable Tom Setzer, who was off-duty. They continued the advanced lifesaving measures, and it took three shocks before her body responded. Shirley Eady was transported to The Medical Center, Beaver.

It happened before in 1983. Shirley Eady suddenly collapsed on Brighton Avenue and was revived by then patrolman Les Fraser, who later became Rochester’s police chief …..

Go here for the rest of the story.