Couldn’t Help But Notice (072007)
Congrats to Justin at Right on the Right on Two Full Years of Blogging.
_______________________________________
iPod, therefore iMac? — “Apple didn’t make the top five in worldwide PC shipments, but in its home turf in the United States, the company boosted Mac sales year over year by 26.2% to 960,000 units, IDC estimates. Apple’s share of the U.S. market rose to 5.6% from 4.8%, or 760,000 units, a year ago.”
3-1/2 years ago (Q4 2003), Apple’s US market share was barely over 2%.
Context, though, requires noting that HP and Dell are the big cahunas: “Worldwide PC shipments increased 12.5% in the second quarter year over year to 58.8 million units, according to IDC. Hewlett-Packard(HP) continued to lead, increasing shipments by 35.5% to take a 19.3% share of the market. Dell remained firmly in second place with a 16.1% share, but shipped 4.9% fewer units.”
________________________________________
In an administration that is supposedly a group of sellouts to the business class, the Bush Justice Department has a strange way of demonstrating its affection:
Quick: How Many CFOs Have Been Convicted?
While Enron, WorldCom, and Tyco offer the marquee examples of CFOs brought down in the past five years of legal action against accounting abuses, a report issued by the President’s Corporate Fraud Task Force calculates that at least 53 finance chiefs have been convicted since 2002.
In what is becoming a great year for fifth anniversaries of corporate enforcement activity, the tally of convicted CFOs appeared in the task force’s review of its own first five years in business. It said that there have been 1,236 convictions in all in such corporate cases, including 214 chief executives, 23 corporate counsels or attorneys, and 128 vice presidents. The task force gave itself significant credit, noting that it “has compiled a strong record of combating corporate fraud and punishing those who violate the trust of employees and investors.”
In addition to the convictions, the task force noted, more than $1 billion dollars in fraud-related forfeitures has been distributed to victims of corporate fraud over that span.
Quick: During which administration did the crimes of many, if not most, of these execs take place — espcially the big ones?
_______________________________________
This report from Dayton TV station WHIO alleges confusion about the credit monitoring process put into place by the State of Ohio as a result of the mid-June data theft (HT to an e-mailer):
The letters are from the Ohio Department of Administrative Services and not the tax department or from Ohio Gov. Ted Strickland.
People like Bill Burnett, of Miamisburg, are upset that the data was compromised in the first place. He is even more upset that the letter asked him to send his personal information to a company in Texas for identity theft protection.
State authorities said they are getting calls from taxpayers, too, asking if the letter is for real or if it is a scam.
State officials said if the letter comes from the Department of Administrative Services, it real, and yes, they are advising people to send in an application for identity theft protection.
The company that the state is buying the service from is in Texas.
Though the state is obviously in an awkward situation no matter what it does, it seems to me that the letter should have come from the governor himself, with news reports announcing a guv-signed letter. Of course, some people would be skeptical of a letter like that, but I believe that their number would be lower, and that the rate of people signing up for the needed protection would be higher, because of the authority behind such a letter.
As to Debix, the company in Texas the state has chosen for the year of free credit monitoring — I think the state should have insisted that the sign-up portal for those affected have a lot less (or no) promotion of Debix’s paid protection products. How convenient it is for Debix that it gets to aggressively push its products to a captive audience of hundreds of thousands.










I was one of the masses whose identifying information was lost and received a letter from the Department of Taxation vis a vis the Debix offer. That was a few weeks back. Just this week, however, I was informed our LLC’s info was also lost, and this time we received the letter from DAS, but there was no offer for Debix, simply some websites with suggestions on how to protect your identity. I wonder if those sites have any suggestions about not leaving the vital stats of all your clients in an intern’s car….
Comment by Andy Vance — July 20, 2007 @ 8:53 am
WMD staffers have acquired a copy of the letter being sent out by Hugh Quill on the DataGate identity protection issue. I’m hoping that we will be able to print the parts of the letter that doesn’t reveal the source’s identity some time this weekend…
Comment by Matt Hurley — July 20, 2007 @ 9:22 am
#1, that is really weak. Why would LLCs not be able to get some form of protection?
#2, must be nice to have a staff. :–> Look forward to seeing the letter.
Comment by TBlumer — July 20, 2007 @ 9:48 am
[…] As BizzyBlog said, the letter should have come from Gov. Strickland, instead of a letter, ful of advertising, from a TEXAS company. […]
Pingback by Confusion about Crediting Monitoring Services Being Provided to Those Who May Have their ID Stolen, Thanks to Gov. Strickland « Right Angle Blog — July 20, 2007 @ 10:35 am