<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: US Old Media Virtually Silent As UK Severely Restricts Use of Alzheimer&#8217;s Drug</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bizzyblog.com/2007/08/20/us-old-media-virtually-silent-as-uk-severely-restricts-use-of-alzheimers-drug/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bizzyblog.com/2007/08/20/us-old-media-virtually-silent-as-uk-severely-restricts-use-of-alzheimers-drug/</link>
	<description>The Business End of the Blogosphere</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 00:33:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.bizzyblog.com/2007/08/20/us-old-media-virtually-silent-as-uk-severely-restricts-use-of-alzheimers-drug/#comment-116415</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 16:22:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bizzyblog.com/2007/08/20/us-old-media-virtually-silent-as-uk-severely-restricts-use-of-alzheimers-drug/#comment-116415</guid>
		<description>To add to point #5, look at the whole industry of cosmetic surgery. Prices have come down and the specialization of the procedures have improved, all without government interference. Sure there are some problems one would see on 20/20, but overall the industry has fewer problems than the main stream medical community. 

As for point #2, I'll refrain from commenting only not to detract from the central thread. But I disagree and can explain at another time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To add to point #5, look at the whole industry of cosmetic surgery. Prices have come down and the specialization of the procedures have improved, all without government interference. Sure there are some problems one would see on 20/20, but overall the industry has fewer problems than the main stream medical community. </p>
<p>As for point #2, I&#8217;ll refrain from commenting only not to detract from the central thread. But I disagree and can explain at another time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: High CSQ &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Another example to show government furnished health care may not be the best idea</title>
		<link>http://www.bizzyblog.com/2007/08/20/us-old-media-virtually-silent-as-uk-severely-restricts-use-of-alzheimers-drug/#comment-116396</link>
		<dc:creator>High CSQ &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Another example to show government furnished health care may not be the best idea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 06:54:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bizzyblog.com/2007/08/20/us-old-media-virtually-silent-as-uk-severely-restricts-use-of-alzheimers-drug/#comment-116396</guid>
		<description>[...] From Bizzy Blog: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] From Bizzy Blog: [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TBlumer</title>
		<link>http://www.bizzyblog.com/2007/08/20/us-old-media-virtually-silent-as-uk-severely-restricts-use-of-alzheimers-drug/#comment-116392</link>
		<dc:creator>TBlumer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 18:53:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bizzyblog.com/2007/08/20/us-old-media-virtually-silent-as-uk-severely-restricts-use-of-alzheimers-drug/#comment-116392</guid>
		<description>#3 &#038; #4, I saw Luskin's entry during the past 30 days or so as I absorbed the reality of Coingate.

I did a post on Lasik a while ago that you motivated me to find and add as an update.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#3 &#038; #4, I saw Luskin&#8217;s entry during the past 30 days or so as I absorbed the reality of Coingate.</p>
<p>I did a post on Lasik a while ago that you motivated me to find and add as an update.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe C.</title>
		<link>http://www.bizzyblog.com/2007/08/20/us-old-media-virtually-silent-as-uk-severely-restricts-use-of-alzheimers-drug/#comment-116391</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 18:44:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bizzyblog.com/2007/08/20/us-old-media-virtually-silent-as-uk-severely-restricts-use-of-alzheimers-drug/#comment-116391</guid>
		<description>Imagine the whole health care system working like the market for Lasik surgery - 30% drop in price, &#62;90% consumer satisfaction - all because of minimal third-party and government intervention (http://www.nationalcenter.org/Z022107=Health_Care_Blog_Markets.html).  
Believe me, as the rest of the world has seen, the more government is involved in health care, the cost, quality, and satisfaction all go down together.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Imagine the whole health care system working like the market for Lasik surgery - 30% drop in price, &gt;90% consumer satisfaction - all because of minimal third-party and government intervention (http://www.nationalcenter.org/Z022107=Health_Care_Blog_Markets.html).<br />
Believe me, as the rest of the world has seen, the more government is involved in health care, the cost, quality, and satisfaction all go down together.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe C.</title>
		<link>http://www.bizzyblog.com/2007/08/20/us-old-media-virtually-silent-as-uk-severely-restricts-use-of-alzheimers-drug/#comment-116390</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 18:31:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bizzyblog.com/2007/08/20/us-old-media-virtually-silent-as-uk-severely-restricts-use-of-alzheimers-drug/#comment-116390</guid>
		<description>The whole BWC mess was mostly a Democrat operation, except for Noe (whose investments made money) http://www.nationalreview.com/nrof_luskin/luskin200506211013.asp . This fact was completely whitewashed by the legacy media during the campaigns.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The whole BWC mess was mostly a Democrat operation, except for Noe (whose investments made money) <a href="http://www.nationalreview.com/nrof_luskin/luskin200506211013.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.nationalreview.com/nrof_luskin/luskin200506211013.asp</a> . This fact was completely whitewashed by the legacy media during the campaigns.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TBlumer</title>
		<link>http://www.bizzyblog.com/2007/08/20/us-old-media-virtually-silent-as-uk-severely-restricts-use-of-alzheimers-drug/#comment-116389</link>
		<dc:creator>TBlumer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 17:45:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bizzyblog.com/2007/08/20/us-old-media-virtually-silent-as-uk-severely-restricts-use-of-alzheimers-drug/#comment-116389</guid>
		<description>Brian, I think Fred will be against nationalized health care.

I think Ron Paul had a lot of potential until he played the â€œlet\'s understand themâ€ game with terrorism. I do not think that is spinnable. And anyone looks good on security compared to Hillary and Obama.

I also do not think that winning the WOT and making the medical system more free-market, not less, are incompatible objectives. The threat of nationalized health care is a serious one, though, that has potential to, among many other bad things, turn euthanasia-lite into national policy virtually undetected.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian, I think Fred will be against nationalized health care.</p>
<p>I think Ron Paul had a lot of potential until he played the â€œlet\&#8217;s understand themâ€ game with terrorism. I do not think that is spinnable. And anyone looks good on security compared to Hillary and Obama.</p>
<p>I also do not think that winning the WOT and making the medical system more free-market, not less, are incompatible objectives. The threat of nationalized health care is a serious one, though, that has potential to, among many other bad things, turn euthanasia-lite into national policy virtually undetected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.bizzyblog.com/2007/08/20/us-old-media-virtually-silent-as-uk-severely-restricts-use-of-alzheimers-drug/#comment-116388</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 17:04:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bizzyblog.com/2007/08/20/us-old-media-virtually-silent-as-uk-severely-restricts-use-of-alzheimers-drug/#comment-116388</guid>
		<description>Tom;

I would throw in the belief that the majority of Republican candidates would go along with some form of national health care also. Besides Romney, one can conclude based upon their track records that Rudy and McCain would. I also think that Huckebee would too. I could be wrong though.

So with out coming across as a Ron Paul commercial, who does that leave; Hunter, Tancredo and Paul? I would think that this group would not endorse national health care. 

In the end when we consider the disastrous effects of a national health care system, we are not served very well by the GOP or our republican politicians because they are be led down the road to serfdom by the MSM. What bothers me most of all when I read fellow SOB weblogs is that this group is willing to look the other way all for some nebulas belief that somehow they will be â€œmore secureâ€ with Rudy, McCain, or Romney. But how secure are you going to be as a national health care gets implemented along the same model as the post office or AMTRAC?

What should we be afraid of 50 al-Qaeda Islamist or the enlargement of government as it takes over the full means of health care?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom;</p>
<p>I would throw in the belief that the majority of Republican candidates would go along with some form of national health care also. Besides Romney, one can conclude based upon their track records that Rudy and McCain would. I also think that Huckebee would too. I could be wrong though.</p>
<p>So with out coming across as a Ron Paul commercial, who does that leave; Hunter, Tancredo and Paul? I would think that this group would not endorse national health care. </p>
<p>In the end when we consider the disastrous effects of a national health care system, we are not served very well by the GOP or our republican politicians because they are be led down the road to serfdom by the MSM. What bothers me most of all when I read fellow SOB weblogs is that this group is willing to look the other way all for some nebulas belief that somehow they will be â€œmore secureâ€ with Rudy, McCain, or Romney. But how secure are you going to be as a national health care gets implemented along the same model as the post office or AMTRAC?</p>
<p>What should we be afraid of 50 al-Qaeda Islamist or the enlargement of government as it takes over the full means of health care?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
