Excerpt of the Day: On Newspaper Devolution
Can’t help but think of the Cincinnati Enquirer as I read this three year-old piece from Dan Froomkin (HT Jill at Writes Like She Talks via e-mail):
I have a theory about why newspaper circulation is down. It’s not so much the Internet or demographics — at least not in and of themselves.
I think it’s at least in part because newspapers have failed to give readers evidence that reporters really know the community, least of all care about it. That used to be a given, decades ago.
Similarly, newspapers have failed to showcase how deeply knowledgeable and caring their reporters are about the issues they cover.
And in the absence of evidence of that sort of connection, readers feel free to drift away, either to ignorance or to commoditized news on the likes of Yahoo.
Many would decry this as the result of industry consolidation. But just because the businesses consolidated, it shouldn’t necessarily have followed that the local papers lost touch with their communities. But lost it they mostly have.
____________________________________________
UPDATE: In fact, many “reporters” seem to pride themselves on how detached they are, to the point of considering it an integral element of what they misguidedly see as their “integrity.” Geez, was Ernie Pyle less of a “reporter” in World War II because he clearly hoped that our side would win?
UPDATE 2, Sept. 3: Ed Driscoll points to “cosmopolitanism” and refers to a great related 2003 piece from Jonah Goldberg.










