<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WSJ: We Should Be Talking About Another Tax Cut</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bizzyblog.com/2007/09/10/wsj-we-should-be-talking-about-another-tax-cut/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bizzyblog.com/2007/09/10/wsj-we-should-be-talking-about-another-tax-cut/</link>
	<description>The Business End of the Blogosphere</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 04:02:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: TBlumer</title>
		<link>http://www.bizzyblog.com/2007/09/10/wsj-we-should-be-talking-about-another-tax-cut/#comment-116761</link>
		<dc:creator>TBlumer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 01:50:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bizzyblog.com/2007/09/10/wsj-we-should-be-talking-about-another-tax-cut/#comment-116761</guid>
		<description>#3 Joe C -- I get the WSJ daily e-mail (received today at 7:25 a.m.), and had read the editorial by the time I saw your comment, which was not until about 9 AM. 

I would have given you credit if I hadn't seen the editorial first myself, and am more than glad to give credit when appropriate.

Thanks for the thoughts. Don't be a stranger.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#3 Joe C &#8212; I get the WSJ daily e-mail (received today at 7:25 a.m.), and had read the editorial by the time I saw your comment, which was not until about 9 AM. </p>
<p>I would have given you credit if I hadn&#8217;t seen the editorial first myself, and am more than glad to give credit when appropriate.</p>
<p>Thanks for the thoughts. Don&#8217;t be a stranger.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe C.</title>
		<link>http://www.bizzyblog.com/2007/09/10/wsj-we-should-be-talking-about-another-tax-cut/#comment-116755</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 21:46:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bizzyblog.com/2007/09/10/wsj-we-should-be-talking-about-another-tax-cut/#comment-116755</guid>
		<description>You're welcome ( http://www.bizzyblog.com/?comments_popup=5772 ).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re welcome ( <a href="http://www.bizzyblog.com/?comments_popup=5772" rel="nofollow">http://www.bizzyblog.com/?comments_popup=5772</a> ).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TBlumer</title>
		<link>http://www.bizzyblog.com/2007/09/10/wsj-we-should-be-talking-about-another-tax-cut/#comment-116752</link>
		<dc:creator>TBlumer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 20:20:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bizzyblog.com/2007/09/10/wsj-we-should-be-talking-about-another-tax-cut/#comment-116752</guid>
		<description>#1, Year to year comparisons are more meaningful, because receipts are so seasonal (2Q has two big collection months for estimated taxes, 1Q has one).

I'll have a post on the situation through 11 months of the current fiscal year on Thursday evening or Friday morning after the Monthly Treasury Statement comes out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#1, Year to year comparisons are more meaningful, because receipts are so seasonal (2Q has two big collection months for estimated taxes, 1Q has one).</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll have a post on the situation through 11 months of the current fiscal year on Thursday evening or Friday morning after the Monthly Treasury Statement comes out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dscott</title>
		<link>http://www.bizzyblog.com/2007/09/10/wsj-we-should-be-talking-about-another-tax-cut/#comment-116751</link>
		<dc:creator>dscott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 18:37:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bizzyblog.com/2007/09/10/wsj-we-should-be-talking-about-another-tax-cut/#comment-116751</guid>
		<description>Tom, On the BEA site did you notice the rapid decline of annual federal debt from the 2007 first to the second quarter? http://www.bea.gov/bea/dn/nipaweb/TableView.asp?SelectedTable=84&#38;FirstYear=2004&#38;LastYear=2006&#38;Freq=Qtr&#38;3Place=Y When compared to the previous year, this looks very interesting. The tax receipts jumped by $77 billion in the 2nd quarter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom, On the BEA site did you notice the rapid decline of annual federal debt from the 2007 first to the second quarter? <a href="http://www.bea.gov/bea/dn/nipaweb/TableView.asp?SelectedTable=84&amp;FirstYear=2004&amp;LastYear=2006&amp;Freq=Qtr&amp;3Place=Y" rel="nofollow">http://www.bea.gov/bea/dn/nipaweb/TableView.asp?SelectedTable=84&amp;FirstYear=2004&amp;LastYear=2006&amp;Freq=Qtr&amp;3Place=Y</a> When compared to the previous year, this looks very interesting. The tax receipts jumped by $77 billion in the 2nd quarter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
