The September Employment Numbers (100507)
Run-up
Earlier reports on the economy from the Institute for Supply Management show that there was continued expansion during September in manufacturing (52.0) and non-manufacturing (54.8). Both readings were down about a point from August’s 52.9 and 55.8, respectively.
Last month’s report of a reduction of 4,000 jobs, plus downward revisions to the two previous months, has the markets, or at least market commentators, obsessing over today’s jobs number.
In the runup, ADP’s Employment Report released on Wednesday reported a pickup of 58,000 nonfarm jobs.
I don’t have a link, but radio reports I heard yesterday indicated that analysts think that the Bureau of Labor Statistics will report 95,000 net new jobs. Haven’t heard much about the unemployment rate, so I suspect the consensus is that it will remain at 4.6%.
Also don’t have a link for this, but new jobless claims dipped below 300,000 last week, which if I recall correctly was the lowest number in about a year.
The Report (BLS release is here):
- Unemployment — 4.7%, up 0.1% from August
- New Establishment Survey Jobs — +110,000
- Revisions to previous months — July, + 25,000 (from 68,000 to 93,000); August, +93,000 (from -4,000 to +89,000).
- Net change in new jobs, including revisions to prior months — +228,000 (110 + 25 + 93)
- Change in number of people working per the Household Survey — plus 463,000.
Quick Thoughts:
Wow — That three-month change is a lot of new jobs. The revisions to the previous months were especially nice to see. Last-month’s prior-month revisions went the other way, and I had feared it would be the beginning of a trend. The July and August revisions above are so big that Old Media reporters will be negligent if they don’t prominently note them. Pundits looking for clouds will probably point to the decrease in construction and manufacturing jobs, or to the slight uptick in the overall unemployment rate.
The changes to August make you wonder, first, what the hyperventilating was all about over August, and second, why people focus in so much on the current month without paying that much attention to changes made to the previous two.
Oh, and “the streak,” thought to be broken last month, is back — Net jobs have now increased for 48 straight months, the longest streak in at least the past 10 years.
______________________________________
UPDATE: Also, in light of the change to August from -4,000 to +89,000, I await retractions of the following statements made in response to last month’s employment report –
Democratic candidates used the first monthly decline in employment in four years to attack Mr. Bush. Senator Barack Obama of Illinois said Mr. Bush’s economic policies demonstrated his “failure to lead.”
Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton of New York said the jobs data proved the administration’s strategy was “not working for working Americans.”
With the reported change, I would hope, but don’t expect, that Obama (known as BOOHOO around here) will praise the president’s leadership, and that Mrs. Clinton will now inform us that the administration’s strategy IS working. Perhaps New York Times reporter Edmund Andrews, whose piece the excerpted quotes come from, will ask the two candidates for clarifications. (/sarc)
Related posts are at NewsBusters.org and the Cleveland Plain Dealer’s Wide Open blog.









