<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SCHIP Income Eligibility: $100K, $120K &#8230;.. Hey, It Looks Like the Sky&#8217;s the Limit!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bizzyblog.com/2007/10/10/schip-income-bidding-raised-100k-120k-hey-looks-like-the-skys-the-limit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bizzyblog.com/2007/10/10/schip-income-bidding-raised-100k-120k-hey-looks-like-the-skys-the-limit/</link>
	<description>The Business End of the Blogosphere</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 03:20:55 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: TBlumer</title>
		<link>http://www.bizzyblog.com/2007/10/10/schip-income-bidding-raised-100k-120k-hey-looks-like-the-skys-the-limit/#comment-117267</link>
		<dc:creator>TBlumer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 11:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bizzyblog.com/2007/10/10/schip-income-bidding-raised-100k-120k-hey-looks-like-the-skys-the-limit/#comment-117267</guid>
		<description>#3, I like that ParisCare idea. Would hope it catches on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#3, I like that ParisCare idea. Would hope it catches on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Porkopolis</title>
		<link>http://www.bizzyblog.com/2007/10/10/schip-income-bidding-raised-100k-120k-hey-looks-like-the-skys-the-limit/#comment-117265</link>
		<dc:creator>Porkopolis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 02:37:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bizzyblog.com/2007/10/10/schip-income-bidding-raised-100k-120k-hey-looks-like-the-skys-the-limit/#comment-117265</guid>
		<description>Another BizzBlog classic!

Along the same line, &lt;a href="http://porkopolis.blogspot.com/2007/03/state-childrens-health-insurance.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;a while back I posted&lt;/a&gt; on the proposed expansion of SCHIP by one advocate in Denver and noted:

...Ms. Susan Molina of Denver (the single-mother, activist and subject of the Ms. Rovner's NPR report) has testified before Congress and supports benefits for families up to 300% of the federal poverty guidelines (see Table: 2006 HHS POVERTY GUIDELINES) of $16,600 for a family of 3. With that policy, a family like Ms. Molina's (1 parent, 2 children) would be eligible for assistance while still having an income up to $49,800 (300% of $16,600).

$49,800 is more than the $47,250 the Economic Policy Institute found (see figure B and Table 1) would be needed for the basic budget of a family of 4 (2 parents, 2 children) in Denver, Colorado which includes health care!...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another BizzBlog classic!</p>
<p>Along the same line, <a href="http://porkopolis.blogspot.com/2007/03/state-childrens-health-insurance.html" rel="nofollow">a while back I posted</a> on the proposed expansion of SCHIP by one advocate in Denver and noted:</p>
<p>&#8230;Ms. Susan Molina of Denver (the single-mother, activist and subject of the Ms. Rovner&#8217;s NPR report) has testified before Congress and supports benefits for families up to 300% of the federal poverty guidelines (see Table: 2006 HHS POVERTY GUIDELINES) of $16,600 for a family of 3. With that policy, a family like Ms. Molina&#8217;s (1 parent, 2 children) would be eligible for assistance while still having an income up to $49,800 (300% of $16,600).</p>
<p>$49,800 is more than the $47,250 the Economic Policy Institute found (see figure B and Table 1) would be needed for the basic budget of a family of 4 (2 parents, 2 children) in Denver, Colorado which includes health care!&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.bizzyblog.com/2007/10/10/schip-income-bidding-raised-100k-120k-hey-looks-like-the-skys-the-limit/#comment-117262</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 22:50:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bizzyblog.com/2007/10/10/schip-income-bidding-raised-100k-120k-hey-looks-like-the-skys-the-limit/#comment-117262</guid>
		<description>I'm going to suggest that conservatives take your cue and start referring to the SCHIP expansion as "ParisCare."  It's catchy.  I like it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m going to suggest that conservatives take your cue and start referring to the SCHIP expansion as &#8220;ParisCare.&#8221;  It&#8217;s catchy.  I like it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CHILDREN AS HUMAN SHIELDS &#171; Texas Hold &#8216;Em Blogger</title>
		<link>http://www.bizzyblog.com/2007/10/10/schip-income-bidding-raised-100k-120k-hey-looks-like-the-skys-the-limit/#comment-117256</link>
		<dc:creator>CHILDREN AS HUMAN SHIELDS &#171; Texas Hold &#8216;Em Blogger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 15:32:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bizzyblog.com/2007/10/10/schip-income-bidding-raised-100k-120k-hey-looks-like-the-skys-the-limit/#comment-117256</guid>
		<description>[...] By the way, in Mexifornia, the sky&#8217;s the limit to qualify for BullSCHIP. Tom Blumer at BizzyBlog points out that families with income in excess of $100,000 or more can qualify for BullSCHIP. In California, then, it appears (based on Democracy Projectâ€™s inquiry) that thereâ€™s nothing stopping a trust fund baby, if their ONLY income comes from investment returns (i.e., itâ€™s â€œunearnedâ€), from qualifying for SCHIP! Paris Hilton and Nicole Ritchie could sit at home and stop boring us with their TV show, appearances, and commercials, have babies by any number of entourage members, and join in the SCHIP party. Is this a great country or what? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] By the way, in Mexifornia, the sky&#8217;s the limit to qualify for BullSCHIP. Tom Blumer at BizzyBlog points out that families with income in excess of $100,000 or more can qualify for BullSCHIP. In California, then, it appears (based on Democracy Projectâ€™s inquiry) that thereâ€™s nothing stopping a trust fund baby, if their ONLY income comes from investment returns (i.e., itâ€™s â€œunearnedâ€), from qualifying for SCHIP! Paris Hilton and Nicole Ritchie could sit at home and stop boring us with their TV show, appearances, and commercials, have babies by any number of entourage members, and join in the SCHIP party. Is this a great country or what? [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Malkin &#187; My reply to Respectable Liberal Blogger Ezra Klein and his fellow travelers</title>
		<link>http://www.bizzyblog.com/2007/10/10/schip-income-bidding-raised-100k-120k-hey-looks-like-the-skys-the-limit/#comment-117252</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Malkin &#187; My reply to Respectable Liberal Blogger Ezra Klein and his fellow travelers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 04:09:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bizzyblog.com/2007/10/10/schip-income-bidding-raised-100k-120k-hey-looks-like-the-skys-the-limit/#comment-117252</guid>
		<description>[...] Large numbers of these adults, also growing in number, are by no sane definition &#8220;working poor.&#8221; As Tom Blumer at BizzyBlog points out: In California&#8230;it appears that thereâ€™s nothing stopping a trust fund baby, if their ONLY income comes from investment returns (i.e., itâ€™s â€œunearnedâ€), from qualifying for SCHIP! Paris Hilton and Nicole Ritchie could sit at home and stop boring us with their TV show, appearances, and commercials, have babies by any number of entourage members, and join in the SCHIP party. Is this a great country or what? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Large numbers of these adults, also growing in number, are by no sane definition &#8220;working poor.&#8221; As Tom Blumer at BizzyBlog points out: In California&#8230;it appears that thereâ€™s nothing stopping a trust fund baby, if their ONLY income comes from investment returns (i.e., itâ€™s â€œunearnedâ€), from qualifying for SCHIP! Paris Hilton and Nicole Ritchie could sit at home and stop boring us with their TV show, appearances, and commercials, have babies by any number of entourage members, and join in the SCHIP party. Is this a great country or what? [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
