November 12, 2007

Couldn’t Help But Notice (111207)

Filed under: Economy, Education, Environment, MSM Biz/Other Bias, Taxes & Government — TBlumer @ 8:38 am

I’d love to see the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT) repealed, but unconditionally and without offsets involving new taxes. If the “paygo” crowd wants offsets, they should reduce spending. That is why the AMT repeal passed last week is totally unacceptable. I believe that AMT repeal would mostly pay for itself (unlike the cap gains and dividends tax cuts, which have totally paid for themselves) in additional tax revenues from increased economic activity.

__________________________________________

Michael Medved continues the stunning roll that he is on:

….. one of the most common (and ignorant) indictments of the Iraq War ….. (has) ….. angry critics of Bush policy emphatically insisting: “This is the first time in history we ever attacked any country that hadn’t attacked us first.” In fact, virtually all our major wars began without some clear-cut attack by the enemy on American soil: the French-and-Indian War, the Revolutionary War, the War of 1812, the Mexican War, the Spanish American War, World War I, Korea, Vietnam and the First Gulf War claimed a total of tens of thousands of American lives based on incidents or interests, but without any undeniable mass assault. In 230 years of history only the Civil War (where Lincoln cleverly lured Southern forces into the initial bombardment of federal property at Fort Sumter) and World War II (where Japan struck at precisely one of those outposts of empire in distant Hawaii that anti-imperialists often decry) commenced in response to enemy strikes.

Read the whole thing.

_____________________________________________

It looks like we’ll still have Antioch College to kick around. Run some of the numbers at the article, though, and you’ll see that the school, whose enrollment is now smaller than my high school senior class, will probably need eeeeevil capitalistic help to survive.

_____________________________________________

This type of campus-victim hoax is all too frequent (HT Taranto at Best of the Web, who notes big differences between the campus newspaper story just linked and this WaPo article).

The frequency of these incidents is a red-flag indicator that the punishments are usually too light. Why the students are able to remain at the school after such serious betrayal is hard to fathom.

_____________________________________________

Peak Oilers must deal with more “bad” news (HT American Thinker):

Petroleo Brasileiro SA, Brazil’s state-controlled oil company, said its Tupi field may contain as much as 8 billion barrels of oil and natural gas, an amount that could boost the country’s reserves by 62 percent. The company’s shares rose the most in more than nine years.

In an update at the American Thinker post, Ed Lasky mentions a reader’s clarification that what is recoverable is far less. Fair enough, but if the past is any guide, the estimate of how much oil is there is probably low.

______________________________________________

Somebody ought to figure out the imputed value of this:

The big broadcast networks have treated the Democratic frontrunners like celebrities worthy of intense coverage, while the Republican candidates have received far less TV time. A new Media Research Center study of the ABC, CBS and NBC morning news shows has found that in the first 10 months of 2007, the networks spent more time covering the Democratic race and spent far more time interviewing the Democratic candidates than the Republicans. And those interviews were much friendlier to the Democrats, with the morning show anchors emphasizing a predominantly liberal agenda.

All three networks spent more time covering the Democrats’ nomination race than the contest for the GOP nomination. Overall, 431 out of the total 797 campaign segments (54%) focused on the Democrats, compared to 247 (31%) devoted to the Republicans. The remaining 119 stories (15%) either dealt with both parties about equally, or dealt with a nonpartisan campaign topic, such as the growing use of YouTube by all candidates.

The indefatigable Media Research Center, for whom yours truly is a Contributing Editor at its NewsBusters blog, has extensively chronicled this (”Rise and Shine on Democrats“), with an accompanying Executive Summary.

2 Comments

  1. Peak Oilers must deal with more “bad” news (HT American Thinker):

    Petroleo Brasileiro SA, Brazil’s state-controlled oil company, said its Tupi field may contain as much as 8 billion barrels of oil and natural gas, an amount that could boost the country’s reserves by 62 percent. The company’s shares rose the most in more than nine years.

    In an update at the American Thinker post, Ed Lasky mentions a reader’s clarification that what is recoverable is far less. Fair enough, but if the past is any guide, the estimate of how much oil is there is probably low.

    The US uses 20 million bpd and even if 50% of that oil (4 billion barrels) is recoverable (unlikely since most new discoveries are marginal now that all the easy oil is gone) that would only last the US 6 months. This is one of only two so-called ‘major’ oil finds I have heard about this year, the other was the Gulf of Mexico and both are in deep water where it is costly to extract.

    Sorry Tom, it just does not work to throw around figures without context. Peak oil is here.

    The Tupi field is in a region that lies about 250 kilometers (402 kilometers) off the coast of Rio de Janeiro in water as much as 3 kilometers deep. The oil rests a further 5 to 7 kilometers below the ocean floor.

    So, how much will it cost to extract this oil??? Do you really think that this one paltry find will make any real difference to oil prices? They stood around hemming and hawing before finally grudgingly including this ‘find’ in the category of recoverable reserves.

    Tom, I am sorry, but after reading your blog and sparring with you on WideOpen I have come to the conclusion that you are not in this for the news. Who is paying you to blog?

    Comment by BizzBuzz — November 15, 2007 @ 6:09 am

  2. #1,

    Q. Who is paying you to blog?

    A. Karl Rove (/sarcasm).

    Real A. (moving back to serious) No one pays me to blog at BizzyBlog except advertisers, and that’s a pittance.

    You are acting like a first-class jerk. Seriously, bleep you. Why shouldn’t I ask who is paying you to make tired PITA enviro arguments that can’t stand the light of day?

    Frankly, you owe me an apology, and if I don’t get one, I’m going to have to reevaluate your right to comment at my place. Continuing to attack the blog owner’s independence without basis will be a sure ticket out of here.

    ++++++++++++++++++++++

    We won’t “run out’ anywhere near as quickly as Peak Oilers claim, if we even run out at all. The Brazil find is the latest in a long line of continuing discoveries. Then there’s shale oil, improved technology that squeezes more out of each field, etc., etc. The only way we\’ll “run out” is if enviros prevent us from accessing what’s available and declare victory.

    Comment by TBlumer — November 15, 2007 @ 10:41 am

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.