Romney in Iowa: Rattle rattle thunder clatter boom boom, ka-boom?
Monday Morning Clacker (aka Chris Stewart), who blogs from New Hampshire at greenmountainpolitics1, covers something that will require some time to absorb:
We don’t like polls.
Especially Iowa Caucus polls with margin of error of 7 points.
But this new Iowa poll is worth pointing out.
Is it ever (bold is mine):
Former Arkansas governor has vaulted over his major challengers to take a commanding lead in the race to win the caucuses …..
The most dramatic result to come out of the poll, which is based on telephone interviews with 1,408 registered Iowa voters on Dec. 5 and 6, is Huckabee’s emergence from the shadows of the GOP race into the front runner’s spot in just two months. The ordained Southern Baptist minister now leads Romney by a two-to-one margin, 39 percent to 17 percent, among likely GOP caucus-goers. In the last NEWSWEEK survey, conducted Sept. 26-27, Huckabee polled a mere 6 percent to Romney’s 25 percent, which then led the field.
That’s a 41-point swing. Just nine days earlier (Nov. 26-27), in a Rasmussen poll, Huckabee led Romney by only three points (28-25).
Note that at least some poll respondents must have stated their preferences after hearing “The Speech” on the morning of December 6.
So much for “Romney’s –Objectively– Great, Great Day.” Heh.
The disintegration just described is a better explanation for the timing of “The Speech” than anything else, doncha think? A serious crumble was speculated on a few days ago by yours truly:
As to Romney, it seems to me that he probably had “such a speech” planned for the GOP convention upon accepting the nomination, or perhaps shortly thereafter. But I suspect that, like a heavily-favored football team caught looking ahead to next week’s game against a hated rival, but down in the fourth quarter to Podunk U, he’s having to pull the speech — his “big play” — out from under the wraps much earlier than he anticipated. It may be that the campaign’s internal polling shows the SS Romney taking on water much more quickly and forcefully than in the info we get to see.
As speculations go, I’d say that was a pretty good one.
Back to the Clack (bold again mine):
Team Romney has to be in a full blown panic.
Full. Blown. Panic.
….. The very talented and smart Marc Ambinder asks if this Newsweek poll is really a gift for Mitt Romney because “it’s always easier to beat expectations when you’re expected to lose”.
Marc raises a fair point.
If Mitt Romney hadn’t already outspent Mike Huckabee 2,431,674,273,193,124,686 to 1 in Iowa.
And if Mitt’s path to the nomination wasn’t built around coming in 1st in the Iowa Caucus.
If Mitt loses Iowa to Huckabee it will be an unmitigated disaster for Team Romney.
I don’t think it’s out of order to ask if all of this, along with similar and frankly stronger contributions from others over a period of several years, is finally making a difference.
__________________________________________
UPDATE: One of the difference-makers, Gregg Jackson of Pundit Review, weighs in on “The Speech” post and the cause of the disintegrating poll numbers –
Apparently, the voters are not as ignorant as the conservative elites think they are.
He specifically calls out the elites, as he should.
UPDATE 2: A Mason-Dixon poll noted at RealClearPolitics has it 32-20-11-5-7 for Huck-Romney-Fred-Rudy-McCain.









