Comments on: Mitt Romney Calls Gregg Jackson ‘Delusional’; What Does That Make Romney?

By: Rose

Rose — Fri, 11 Jan 2008 02:28:33 +0000

None of you can debunk Tom’s facts. So let me get this straight #4, if someone looks/acts like a gentleman, they get a free pass? We’re not to look at the comprehensive review of their “experience?”

Waiter! If Mittwit gets the nomination, I’ll have what #4 is having!

Jeeze, man. The msm will blow this wide open…probably around the last week of October.

I’m surprised “the gentleman” from Massachusetts didn’t learn three very important words @ Harvard: Subject. Matter. Jurisdiction.

The SJC illegally heard the case to begin with b/c the MA state consitution – one of our oldest and perhaps most clear on the separation of powers – states that the the judicial branch has no authority over matters of marriage. Ergo, their “opinion” was just that, and opinion…and you know what they say about opinions…of course you do, you’ve proved it with your comments.

But you know all that and yet this post is scraping “the bottom of the barrel” b/c it points out the truth? Newsflash sparky, the truth will always be revealed, best to deal with it than to deny or try to buy your way out of it w/more fraudulent claims. Disclosure b/f exposure…Marketing 101. Suprised “the gentleman” from Massachusetts didn’t learn that @ Harvard either.

That school must really suck…but I digress.

If Romney were half the man he claims to be, he would have encouraged the impeachment of those judges and said “they’ve given their opinion…now let them enforce it.”

Tom, your work here and in prior posts is simply incredible. I very much appreciate your meticulous attention to detail.

By: TBlumer

TBlumer — Fri, 11 Jan 2008 01:43:57 +0000

#4, I see the substantive comments just keep on comin’.

Added at 9:05 p.m. — Here’s a 2+2=4 exercise:
- Romney calls Jackson “delusional.”
- He later characterizes Jackson’s argument as being one coming from “the folks on the right wing.”
- Romney thus seems to be telling us that “the folks on the right wing” are “delusional.”

What kind of “perfect gentleman” calls “the folks on the right wing,” aka “the philosophical and spiritual base of the Republican party,” delusional?

By: Michael

Michael — Fri, 11 Jan 2008 01:24:31 +0000

Mitt Romney is a gentleman. The people posting this type of nonsense are at the bottom of the barrel of integrity and intelligence, although they probably have a degree from some school.

By: TBlumer

TBlumer — Thu, 10 Jan 2008 21:50:43 +0000

#1, please identify my lies or get off my site. Good luck.

#2. Romney would NOT have been “wrong” to ignore Goodridge. He was duty-bound to ignore Goodridge. I didn’t even mention that the SJC didn’t even have the right to claim jurisdiction in the case under MA’s constitution, so I will now —

The SJC didn’t even have the right to claim jurisdiction in the case under MA’s constitution.

Romney was under the yoke of no order to the executive branch, but he imposed SSM anyway. That is not arguable.

By: Tim

Tim — Thu, 10 Jan 2008 21:45:40 +0000

On this specific point Mitt Romney is correct. Would I have liked to see him ignor the courts decision and continue to refrain from issuing same sex marriage licenses? Well part of me would, but honestly two wrongs don’t make a right. To me the judicial branch of Massachusetts overstepped their Consituitional bounds, however does it really help the situation for the Executive Branch to do the same? No. Mitt Romney obeyed his oath of office to the letter in this.

By: K Price

K Price — Thu, 10 Jan 2008 21:43:10 +0000

Delusional is as delusional does. Reducing Mitt Romney’s answers to clips, stating your evidence of Mitt Romney’s stand as 6 items just off the top of your head. Not only are you delusional you are a flat out liar. Why is it that you find you are not required to be honest, but twist so many others words in an effort to make them sound dishonest. Are you frightened by a man of such success and integrity as Mitt Romney? You certainly come across that way.