Romnian Semantics
From Politico, from a press conference today:
“I don’t have lobbyists running my campaign,†(Mitt) Romney said. “I don’t have lobbyists that are tied to my — â€
Glen Johnson, an Associated Press reporter who was sitting on the floor as he typed on his laptop computer, interrupted to point out that Ron Kaufman, one of Romney’s top advisers, is a lobbyist.
“That’s not true, governor!†Johnson interjected, according to CBS News’ Scott Conroy, who was there. “That is not true. Ron Kaufman is a lobbyist.â€
CBS has posted the video.
“Did you hear what I said — did you hear what I said, Glen?†Romney replied. “I said, ‘I don’t have lobbyists running my campaign,’ and he’s not running my campaign. He’s an adviser. And the person who runs my campaign is [campaign manager] Beth Myers, and I have a whole staff of deputy campaign managers.â€
Objectively Unfit Mitt is trying to play the media persecution card on this incident. Give me a break.
Romney specifically said “I don’t have lobbyists that are TIED to my –” before being interrupted. Obviously the missing word is “campaign.”
Romney then admitted that Ron Kaufman is TIED to his campaign by when he acknowledged that Kaufman is an “adviser,” and again later when he agreed that Kaufman has been in debate preparation(s).
But then, Romney tried to pretend he only said “running,” when everyone in the room, and now every video viewer, clearly saw him say “tied to.”
AP reporter Johnson is right. He caught Romney red-handed.
Leave it to Mitt Romney to make an AP reporter actually look good.
And Eric “Don’t Be Argumentative with the Candidate” can take a flying leap.
Objectively Unfit Mitt looks more like the second coming of Bill “Meaning of Is” Clinton with each passing day. In fact, “Romnian” would likely replace “Clintonian” in the lexicon if, heaven forbid, he were elected President.
__________________________________________
UPDATE: Allah at Hot Air gets it right (”Mitt gets testy with AP reporter over lobbyist accusations”) –
The charge is that Romney, the self-styled candidate of vacuous “changeâ€, is letting his campaign be run by a guy who not only served as political director in the George H.W. Bush administration but is known to some as a “mega-lobbyistâ€, whose firm raised more than $21 million in fees in 2006 alone. True? Strictly speaking, no. Ron Kaufman appears to have no formal role with the campaign, although he’s mentioned in this Fox News story as a member of Mitt’s “inner circle†and is frequently described as a “senior advisor†in other news reports.
But of course, Kaufman is TIED to the campaign.
Bryan’s assessment at the same Hot Air post misses the mark. Romney comes off as a near-bully, and Fehrnstrom as a definite bully. That’s would be a net loss for Objectively Unfit Mitt, who turned a molehill into a mountain.









