One wonders where the Buchanan brigade is on what Hunter brought up.

Mitt’s reputation on building American jobs and business may be another bogus statement by Mitt. Mitt’s vow to keep American jobs, may need to be another statement where Mitts wording needs to be closely examined.

I mean … like the same close examination of Mitt’s wording which needed to be done when Mitt attempted to deceive South Carolina voters that he was a Washington outsider not owing any lobbyist, by stating that he did “not” lobbyist “running” his campaign, to which a shocked journalist questioned Mitt about the “lobbyist’ who had been with Mitt on his many campaign stops, whom the traveling journalist assigned to the Mitter, had been viewing day in and day out with Romney. Mitt in all his ‘holier than thou’ response said listen to my words, I said no lobbyist was ‘running’ my campaign’– oops however there are lobbyist ‘tied’ to Mitts campaign — o.k. America, Mitt likes word games— lobbyist are traveling with him, sitting next to him, chatting with him, but not ‘running’ his campaign.

Mitt told Michigan voters he would fight for Michigan jobs—every ‘one’ of them…. Guess that means if ‘one’ job is left in Michigan; Mitt would have kept his promise to the Michigan voters!

Mitt made what has been termed as ‘jaw dropping’ profits on company buy outs in American, which were leveraged. Mitt made what are described as ‘huge fees’ before companies were bankrupt, Mitt, through his company Bain Capital, also closed American factories which resulted in the lost of American jobs, and the Mitter made huge amounts of money on debt hedge funds.

Not to mention, complex web of hidden accounts in off shore tax havens which are beginning to come to light, some leading to only a P.O. Box in tax haven islands.
Mitts China investments had Duncan Hunter concerned over Mitt Romney, as well as other political figures. Yes, all are fine examples of Romney’s dedication to buying a stronger America.

I’ll also respond that a lot of what Romney did to compromise conservative principles consisted of totally unforced errors, and went way beyond MA Dems’ wildest dreams. He has told certain groups before he was elected that as a Republican governor he could do things and get away with them that a Dem never could.

I enjoyed the post. The scary thing for Ohio is that while Romney did the above under a socialistic state, Taft did it with a Republican controlled General Assembly.

Good comparison.

11:45 p.m. BIZZYBLOG NOTE: Sorry, no free pub for Objectively Unfit candidates. He’s welcome to buy, and can afford to buy, a banner ad. :–>