Your first comment said:
When you state your own logical averments to Romney’s positions I will respond accordingly.

Now that you know where those “logical averments” are, you are free to respond accordingly, though you certainly don’t have to.

The “Objectively Unfit” appellation refers to the points raised at one specific post.

#12, yawn.

Also, “com·pre·hen·sive” (as you used it, as an adjective)
–adjective 1. of large scope; covering or involving all aspects; inclusive: a comprehensive study of world affairs.
2. comprehending mentally; having an complete mental range or grasp.

There is no way, by definition, that you can honestly claim
that your “index” is a “Comprehensive Objectively Unfit Mitt Romney Index.”

You can’t validly criticize an index as “yellow journalism.” It’s an index, for cryin’ out loud. The substance is at the links. Look for the “yellow journalism” there.

“Zheesh” is my own word. I get to invent ‘em occasionally.

Either the one is lazy cut-and-paste, or the other is the most “inaccurate, shoddily fabricated piece of yellow “journalism” in my life.” You can’t have both.

Oh yeah, “obtuse”; have you seen a style guide lately? And “Zseesh”; -5 spelling incorrect, or no such word.

Jeez!

95%+ of what’s in the index refers to posts I myself have done since mid-November, with coherent arguments galore. Read them. Hate not included.

The answer to my question above is “I guess so.” Zheesh.

I call it “search-cut-and-paste” laziness because you have a prejudice PRIOR to any realistic study and thought.

Original research and the corresponding conclusions are the hallmarks of free thought. Instead of listening to the snake, Eve should have thought for herself. You should do the same.

The “occasional Romney visitors” may well answer if you had posited a coherent argument. But then, why should they bother?

Your obvious just hate position does not impress me. Pretty, and cleverly named web sites can be just as good - or bad - as any black and white, plain 8-1/2″ by 11″ flyer.

Substance, TBlumer, not style. Substance.

HERE

So this is your reaction to having read an index?

Perhaps you can answer the substantive arguments presented in the underlying posts. None of the other occasional Romney visitors has come up with anything beyond your “critique,” so you’d be the first.

Just yelling “Witch!” Every time you see a broom gets you nowhere, except with Hillary and the Chicken Little crowd. When you get serious, educated on the issues, and fair . . . then dial us back. Until then, whenever you have a hateful thought, just let it go.

Seriously, where are the really men of GM, or have they all packed up and left.

God Bless Americian, as He created it, as a land of freedom, HE HIMSELF laid down the laws in Scripture, and handed them to MEN.

I nor the over 100 members of my family, yes 100 of us will not by GM at all.

Remember word of mouth is much stronger than a billion dollar commercial. My 100 family members, tell just one person each, that is 200, and that person tells another that is 400 , get the picture.
I was proud to have an American made vehicle, but I will soon sell it for a Europe or China. Sad, because it was once a very proud thing to do, to purchase an American made vehicle. NO MORE!

With draw your support, reinstate pride, and the American way.

Sincerely
Doreen E. Carter