<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AP Writer Miscasts Housing Measurements to Portray Home-Value &#8216;Crisis&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bizzyblog.com/2008/03/03/ap-writer-miscasts-housing-measurements-to-portray-home-value-crisis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bizzyblog.com/2008/03/03/ap-writer-miscasts-housing-measurements-to-portray-home-value-crisis/</link>
	<description>The Business End of the Blogosphere</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 15:08:48 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: TBlumer</title>
		<link>http://www.bizzyblog.com/2008/03/03/ap-writer-miscasts-housing-measurements-to-portray-home-value-crisis/comment-page-1/#comment-120813</link>
		<dc:creator>TBlumer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 17:46:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bizzyblog.com/2008/03/03/ap-writer-miscasts-housing-measurements-to-portray-home-value-crisis/#comment-120813</guid>
		<description>Aw, this is ridiculous.

Fox&#039;s headline is misleading as h*ll, but they seem to be alone in using it. AP&#039;s raw headline, at least at the moment, is &quot;Construction Spending Dives in January.&quot;

What you got to is seasonally adjusted. What AP is reporting as &quot;slashes&quot; is a normal not-seasonally-adjusted slowdown due to winter weather, which of course happens every year. In fact, since the winter is in some areas of the US the worst in 40 years, you&#039;d expect the slowdown to be greater. Zheesh.

I have to save this for tonight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aw, this is ridiculous.</p>
<p>Fox&#8217;s headline is misleading as h*ll, but they seem to be alone in using it. AP&#8217;s raw headline, at least at the moment, is &#8220;Construction Spending Dives in January.&#8221;</p>
<p>What you got to is seasonally adjusted. What AP is reporting as &#8220;slashes&#8221; is a normal not-seasonally-adjusted slowdown due to winter weather, which of course happens every year. In fact, since the winter is in some areas of the US the worst in 40 years, you&#8217;d expect the slowdown to be greater. Zheesh.</p>
<p>I have to save this for tonight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dscott</title>
		<link>http://www.bizzyblog.com/2008/03/03/ap-writer-miscasts-housing-measurements-to-portray-home-value-crisis/comment-page-1/#comment-120811</link>
		<dc:creator>dscott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 17:04:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bizzyblog.com/2008/03/03/ap-writer-miscasts-housing-measurements-to-portray-home-value-crisis/#comment-120811</guid>
		<description>Yes, it is interesting that the MSM continues with meme when in fact we have conflicting data: http://www.census.gov/const/C30/totsa.pdf Look at the differences between page 1 and 2.  Here is the Jan. 2008 construction spending page: http://www.census.gov/const/www/c30index.html 

In fact, drill down and look at the residential construction: http://www.census.gov/const/C30/residentialsa.pdf I notice that we are back to 2003 levels of construction.  Yet what are the headlines stating? http://www.foxbusiness.com/markets/economy/article/construction-spending-nosedives-14year-low_502141_3.html 
versus:
http://www.census.gov/const/C30/release.pdf</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, it is interesting that the MSM continues with meme when in fact we have conflicting data: <a href="http://www.census.gov/const/C30/totsa.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.census.gov/const/C30/totsa.pdf</a> Look at the differences between page 1 and 2.  Here is the Jan. 2008 construction spending page: <a href="http://www.census.gov/const/www/c30index.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.census.gov/const/www/c30index.html</a> </p>
<p>In fact, drill down and look at the residential construction: <a href="http://www.census.gov/const/C30/residentialsa.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.census.gov/const/C30/residentialsa.pdf</a> I notice that we are back to 2003 levels of construction.  Yet what are the headlines stating? <a href="http://www.foxbusiness.com/markets/economy/article/construction-spending-nosedives-14year-low_502141_3.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.foxbusiness.com/markets/economy/article/construction-spending-nosedives-14year-low_502141_3.html</a><br />
versus:<br />
<a href="http://www.census.gov/const/C30/release.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.census.gov/const/C30/release.pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
