<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ohio Primary: Why I&#8217;m Voting for Fred Thompson Tomorrow</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bizzyblog.com/2008/03/03/ohio-primary-why-im-voting-for-fred-thompson-on-tuesday/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bizzyblog.com/2008/03/03/ohio-primary-why-im-voting-for-fred-thompson-on-tuesday/</link>
	<description>The Business End of the Blogosphere</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 08:11:02 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: TBlumer</title>
		<link>http://www.bizzyblog.com/2008/03/03/ohio-primary-why-im-voting-for-fred-thompson-on-tuesday/comment-page-1/#comment-120827</link>
		<dc:creator>TBlumer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 14:15:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bizzyblog.com/2008/03/03/ohio-primary-why-im-voting-for-fred-thompson-on-tuesday/#comment-120827</guid>
		<description>#4, you&#039;re hysterical. The dirty little secret of Iraq is that Clinton would never have even bothered with it if not for the need to distract from Monica/impeachment and look presidential. He said all sorts of aggressive things he would have preferred not to (things like &quot;Iraq has WMDs&quot;), and other things he really didn&#039;t mean but made him look like a leader.

Years later, he got quoted as proof that everyone knew about WMDs all along -- along with various congressmen and senators who came along for the impeachment-defense ride. In 2002, of course the Senate and Congress had to support the war, or they would have had to repudiate their best bud and their own words from only 3-4 years before.

In the real world, the bipartisan support inoculated Bush from criticism that he was launching a GOP war.

Who says that what goes around doesn&#039;t come around? :--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#4, you&#8217;re hysterical. The dirty little secret of Iraq is that Clinton would never have even bothered with it if not for the need to distract from Monica/impeachment and look presidential. He said all sorts of aggressive things he would have preferred not to (things like &#8220;Iraq has WMDs&#8221;), and other things he really didn&#8217;t mean but made him look like a leader.</p>
<p>Years later, he got quoted as proof that everyone knew about WMDs all along &#8212; along with various congressmen and senators who came along for the impeachment-defense ride. In 2002, of course the Senate and Congress had to support the war, or they would have had to repudiate their best bud and their own words from only 3-4 years before.</p>
<p>In the real world, the bipartisan support inoculated Bush from criticism that he was launching a GOP war.</p>
<p>Who says that what goes around doesn&#8217;t come around? :&#8211;></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sayno2clinton</title>
		<link>http://www.bizzyblog.com/2008/03/03/ohio-primary-why-im-voting-for-fred-thompson-on-tuesday/comment-page-1/#comment-120826</link>
		<dc:creator>sayno2clinton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 10:15:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bizzyblog.com/2008/03/03/ohio-primary-why-im-voting-for-fred-thompson-on-tuesday/#comment-120826</guid>
		<description>Team Clinton doesn&#039;t realize we all didnâ€™t fall off turnip trucks out here. They also don&#039;t realize most of the people canâ€™t be fooled most of the time. Yet, Team Clinton, relying on Mark Pennâ€™s Focus-Group polling, decided from the beginning to discover common gullibilities and then exploit them. Itâ€™s proved to be a miserable failure, first because it didnâ€™t work. Second, because it proves how inauthentic Team Clinton is.

Team Clinton woefully underestimated the American skill at detecting snake oil. We may buy it for a while, but donâ€™t keep shoving it down our throats after weâ€™ve seen it for what it is. Mrs. Clinton didnâ€™t get that memo.

There are basically two areas that Team Clinton claims to have experience in - foreign affairs and economics - that seem to be convincing some people of Mrs. Clintonâ€™s superiority. But a brief reading of some historical documents, and many individuals have come to realize just how damaging the Clinton Administration was.

First, Mrs. Clinton has insistently claimed that she didnâ€™t know that W was intent on going to war with Iraq, which is why she voted to give him the power to go to war. This is clearly not true. In 1998 the Project for the New American Century - a Neoconservative think-tank with Rumsfeld and Wolfowitz as members - wrote Bill Clinton a letter, urging him to seek regime change in Iraq. See: http://www.newamericancentury.org/iraqclintonletter.htm .

In Dec., â€˜98, as a result of the Neocon pressure to attack Iraq, Clinton conducted Operation Desert Fox - the bombing campaign against Iraq (see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Desert_Fox ). Then in â€˜00 the same team that had urged Bill to attack Iraq moved into the White House. It was only a matter of time before W was going to attack Iraq and both Clintons knew it. By â€˜02 Mrs. Clinton had no doubt whatsoever that W and his Neocon Administration were inevitably going to attack Iraq.

There may be an argument for attacking Iraq, but thereâ€™s no defense for Team Clintonâ€™s deceit regarding the issue. Also, what her flipflopping has done, which she never seems to realize, is that, like the previous Democratic loser, she was for the war before she was against it. How will that fare against McCain if she were to win?

Team Clinton also exhibits a disturbing pattern of deception relating to Billâ€™s Administration and Mrs. Clintonâ€™s original support for NAFTA. First, the econmy wasnâ€™t doing well mostly because of Bill, but because of the prevailing circumstances in the country. They included, oil that was $10 a barrel, a computer and digital revolution, low interest rates, low inflation, early golbalization, inflation of housing prices that bolstered home ownersâ€™ portfolios, as well the deregulation of financial institutions. That deregulation, in part, set the stage for the current subprime meltdown. 

See:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gramm-leach-bliley . This bill enabled banks and lending institutions to restructure and focus on credit and debt. It repealed Glass-Steagall, which had been constructed specifically so the country could avoid another Great Depression. It all changed, however, because of Billâ€™s allegiance to Big Business and to the Third Way (see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third_Way_%28centrism%29 ) - a capitulation to right wing economics. 

If youâ€™re happy with the Neocon foreign policy of the past 8 years, if youâ€™re content with the loss of American manufacturing, static and lower wages, trade that disproportionately favors Big Business, cheap labor, illegal immigration, and weakened unions, then, by all means, vote for Clinton. If youâ€™re unhappy with those conditions, then thereâ€™s only one choice - vote Obama.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Team Clinton doesn&#8217;t realize we all didnâ€™t fall off turnip trucks out here. They also don&#8217;t realize most of the people canâ€™t be fooled most of the time. Yet, Team Clinton, relying on Mark Pennâ€™s Focus-Group polling, decided from the beginning to discover common gullibilities and then exploit them. Itâ€™s proved to be a miserable failure, first because it didnâ€™t work. Second, because it proves how inauthentic Team Clinton is.</p>
<p>Team Clinton woefully underestimated the American skill at detecting snake oil. We may buy it for a while, but donâ€™t keep shoving it down our throats after weâ€™ve seen it for what it is. Mrs. Clinton didnâ€™t get that memo.</p>
<p>There are basically two areas that Team Clinton claims to have experience in &#8211; foreign affairs and economics &#8211; that seem to be convincing some people of Mrs. Clintonâ€™s superiority. But a brief reading of some historical documents, and many individuals have come to realize just how damaging the Clinton Administration was.</p>
<p>First, Mrs. Clinton has insistently claimed that she didnâ€™t know that W was intent on going to war with Iraq, which is why she voted to give him the power to go to war. This is clearly not true. In 1998 the Project for the New American Century &#8211; a Neoconservative think-tank with Rumsfeld and Wolfowitz as members &#8211; wrote Bill Clinton a letter, urging him to seek regime change in Iraq. See: <a href="http://www.newamericancentury.org/iraqclintonletter.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.newamericancentury.org/iraqclintonletter.htm</a> .</p>
<p>In Dec., â€˜98, as a result of the Neocon pressure to attack Iraq, Clinton conducted Operation Desert Fox &#8211; the bombing campaign against Iraq (see: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Desert_Fox" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Desert_Fox</a> ). Then in â€˜00 the same team that had urged Bill to attack Iraq moved into the White House. It was only a matter of time before W was going to attack Iraq and both Clintons knew it. By â€˜02 Mrs. Clinton had no doubt whatsoever that W and his Neocon Administration were inevitably going to attack Iraq.</p>
<p>There may be an argument for attacking Iraq, but thereâ€™s no defense for Team Clintonâ€™s deceit regarding the issue. Also, what her flipflopping has done, which she never seems to realize, is that, like the previous Democratic loser, she was for the war before she was against it. How will that fare against McCain if she were to win?</p>
<p>Team Clinton also exhibits a disturbing pattern of deception relating to Billâ€™s Administration and Mrs. Clintonâ€™s original support for NAFTA. First, the econmy wasnâ€™t doing well mostly because of Bill, but because of the prevailing circumstances in the country. They included, oil that was $10 a barrel, a computer and digital revolution, low interest rates, low inflation, early golbalization, inflation of housing prices that bolstered home ownersâ€™ portfolios, as well the deregulation of financial institutions. That deregulation, in part, set the stage for the current subprime meltdown. </p>
<p>See:<br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gramm-leach-bliley" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gramm-leach-bliley</a> . This bill enabled banks and lending institutions to restructure and focus on credit and debt. It repealed Glass-Steagall, which had been constructed specifically so the country could avoid another Great Depression. It all changed, however, because of Billâ€™s allegiance to Big Business and to the Third Way (see: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third_Way_%28centrism%29" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third_Way_%28centrism%29</a> ) &#8211; a capitulation to right wing economics. </p>
<p>If youâ€™re happy with the Neocon foreign policy of the past 8 years, if youâ€™re content with the loss of American manufacturing, static and lower wages, trade that disproportionately favors Big Business, cheap labor, illegal immigration, and weakened unions, then, by all means, vote for Clinton. If youâ€™re unhappy with those conditions, then thereâ€™s only one choice &#8211; vote Obama.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Plunderbund - &#187; Evidence that smears against Obama work</title>
		<link>http://www.bizzyblog.com/2008/03/03/ohio-primary-why-im-voting-for-fred-thompson-on-tuesday/comment-page-1/#comment-120812</link>
		<dc:creator>Plunderbund - &#187; Evidence that smears against Obama work</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 17:42:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bizzyblog.com/2008/03/03/ohio-primary-why-im-voting-for-fred-thompson-on-tuesday/#comment-120812</guid>
		<description>[...] the false &#8220;Muslim&#8221; smear) than in the truth. Many of them are upset at McCain for condemning these kinds of smears. (I don&#8217;t use my middle name colloquially, so if someone else was, I&#8217;d think they had [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the false &#8220;Muslim&#8221; smear) than in the truth. Many of them are upset at McCain for condemning these kinds of smears. (I don&#8217;t use my middle name colloquially, so if someone else was, I&#8217;d think they had [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TBlumer</title>
		<link>http://www.bizzyblog.com/2008/03/03/ohio-primary-why-im-voting-for-fred-thompson-on-tuesday/comment-page-1/#comment-120808</link>
		<dc:creator>TBlumer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 16:03:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bizzyblog.com/2008/03/03/ohio-primary-why-im-voting-for-fred-thompson-on-tuesday/#comment-120808</guid>
		<description>#1, you&#039;ll note that I did not make an affirmative statement to that effect -- only that McC and Huck are still active. :--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#1, you&#8217;ll note that I did not make an affirmative statement to that effect &#8212; only that McC and Huck are still active. :&#8211;></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.bizzyblog.com/2008/03/03/ohio-primary-why-im-voting-for-fred-thompson-on-tuesday/comment-page-1/#comment-120807</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 15:10:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bizzyblog.com/2008/03/03/ohio-primary-why-im-voting-for-fred-thompson-on-tuesday/#comment-120807</guid>
		<description>Does Fred Thompson ever qualify as being an active candidate?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does Fred Thompson ever qualify as being an active candidate?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
